[Freeipa-devel] Long overdue review of the UI guide
Hi, I finally got some time to review the UI spec. I found some minor and major issues. I do not have latest UI in front of me so please check that nothing is missing or incorrect based on the concerns below. 1) How many results we display in the facet list (like members of a goup)? What if there are many (thousands of group members)? Will we display them all? Or we provide a filter? But I do not see a filter for the facet lists in the spec so either the spec is wrong or we have a problem in UI. 2) Details pages header is the same as any other header not just lis pages. 3) After modal add dialog was used the spec says that the: After the entity is added the modal closes returning to the list page. Does the list get refreshed automatically in this case or not? Is filter preserved or not? 4) Action panel description State 2. See notes section. The first bullet in notes is confusing. The delete button should be grayed when there is no selection while the link should be enabled only if there is a single selection. If there are multiple selections the links should be grayed. 5) Action Panels in state 3. Table includes reference to Kyle by name :-) 6) The UI in multiple places in the example of the action panel says Net Groups but in the text of document it is correct: Netgroups. Please make sure that the correct wording is used in the actual UI, i.e. Netgroups - one word. 7) What is the status of the pages: Hosts I Manage Hosts Managing me Service I Manage? Are they a part of the UI? Do not remember them. Please double check. 8) Do we have the membership in the Netgroups as a facet for users, groups, host groups, hosts and netgroups. Please double check that in all 5 cases we have the correct facet in UI. 9) Do we have a facet Hosts Managing Me for the services? Do not remember them being there. Please double check. 10) Kyle, Ben in the action panel for the cases when we have several sub items as in HBAC for example the the ungrouped facet label (indented) has the same size and style as other (unindented) section labels. This is confusing. I suggest the ungrouped facet label should be of a different style. IMO it is confusing now. 11) I have not seen anything about DNS or automount in the spec. Is it intentional or omission? -- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. --- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Re: [Freeipa-devel] Long overdue review of the UI guide
On 02/21/2011 10:41 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: Hi, I finally got some time to review the UI spec. I found some minor and major issues. I do not have latest UI in front of me so please check that nothing is missing or incorrect based on the concerns below. 1) How many results we display in the facet list (like members of a goup)? What if there are many (thousands of group members)? Will we display them all? Or we provide a filter? But I do not see a filter for the facet lists in the spec so either the spec is wrong or we have a problem in UI. Problem in the UI. Noticed it late last week myself, when I uploaded a really large dataset to the server. For example, since all users go int othe ipausers (unix) group, that facet one will only show the first 100 I entered a ticket for this. Needs to get into the spec, too https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/992 2) Details pages header is the same as any other header not just lis pages. Not sop in the latest UI: You can see it here http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/ipa/ui/ 3) After modal add dialog was used the spec says that the: After the entity is added the modal closes returning to the list page. Does the list get refreshed automatically in this case or not? Is filter preserved or not? Filter is preserved, list gets refreshed. 4) Action panel description State 2. See notes section. The first bullet in notes is confusing. The delete button should be grayed when there is no selection while the link should be enabled only if there is a single selection. If there are multiple selections the links should be grayed. Yeah...haven't figured out a good way grey out the button, as we are currently using the JQuery UI button for that control. The greying out of links was accomplished a while back. 5) Action Panels in state 3. Table includes reference to Kyle by name :-) Kyle Deserves it. Kyle Rocks! 6) The UI in multiple places in the example of the action panel says Net Groups but in the text of document it is correct: Netgroups. Please make sure that the correct wording is used in the actual UI, i.e. Netgroups - one word. We are pretty consistantly using New Groups all over the place. We can make the change. 7) What is the status of the pages: Hosts I Manage Hosts Managing me Service I Manage? Are they a part of the UI? Do not remember them. Please double check. Managed By is there, but I think we lost Hosts Managing Me there have been a lot of problems with the associations, and I would not be surprised if the LDAP relationship underneath it matches something that we deceded elsewhere we don't want to show. Added at ticket https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/993 8) Do we have the membership in the Netgroups as a facet for users, Check groups, Check host groups, CHeck hosts check and netgroups. check Please double check that in all 5 cases we have the correct facet in UI. 9) Do we have a facet Hosts Managing Me for the services? Do not remember them being there. Please double check. Yes. text is Managed By 10) Kyle, Ben in the action panel for the cases when we have several sub items as in HBAC for example the the ungrouped facet label (indented) has the same size and style as other (unindented) section labels. This is confusing. I suggest the ungrouped facet label should be of a different style. IMO it is confusing now. 11) I have not seen anything about DNS or automount in the spec. Is it intentional or omission? Automount should not be there. DNS would have to be reverese engineered. ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Re: [Freeipa-devel] Long overdue review of the UI guide
On 02/21/2011 11:01 AM, Adam Young wrote: 6) The UI in multiple places in the example of the action panel says Net Groups but in the text of document it is correct: Netgroups. Please make sure that the correct wording is used in the actual UI, i.e. Netgroups - one word. We are pretty consistantly using New Groups all over the place. We can make the change. We need to have a ticket for this. Please open. In all other places we use netgroups as one word. -- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. --- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Re: [Freeipa-devel] Long overdue review of the UI guide
On 02/21/2011 12:56 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: In all other places we use netgroups as one word. -- https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/995 ___ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
