Re: [Freeipa-users] Doc. mixup

2012-05-21 Thread Chris Evich

On 05/21/2012 10:12 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:

Chris Evich wrote:

Are there plans to rebase FreeIPA to 2.2 in Fedora 16?


No. It can be possible to run a 2.2 server on F-16 but there are some
things missing.


If not, then should I open a bug to fix up the Fedora 16 FreeIPA docs to
point at the version which actually ships with it?


That would be great, thanks.

rob



Thanks for the info.  I opened a fedora docs bug here: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823654 w/ keywords 
Documentation & EasyFix.


--
Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS
Quality Assurance Engineer
e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


Re: [Freeipa-users] Doc. mixup

2012-05-21 Thread Rob Crittenden

Chris Evich wrote:

Hi,

Not sure if this is the right place or not, but I noticed that the
freeipa.org documentation link for 2.0 goes to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
which is for version 2.1.3.


Ok, I'll take a look. We should probably change the name of the link, at 
one time it pointed to the 2.0 docs.



Freeipa 2.1.x is also what you get with Fedora 16, however the fedora 16
docs at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
show the version as 2.2 and as I've learned (the hard way) there are new
features not supported in 2.1 :D

Are there plans to rebase FreeIPA to 2.2 in Fedora 16?


No. It can be possible to run a 2.2 server on F-16 but there are some 
things missing.



If not, then should I open a bug to fix up the Fedora 16 FreeIPA docs to
point at the version which actually ships with it?


That would be great, thanks.

rob

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


[Freeipa-users] Doc. mixup

2012-05-21 Thread Chris Evich

Hi,

Not sure if this is the right place or not, but I noticed that the 
freeipa.org documentation link for 2.0 goes to 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html 
which is for version 2.1.3.


Freeipa 2.1.x is also what you get with Fedora 16, however the fedora 16 
docs at 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html 
show the version as 2.2 and as I've learned (the hard way) there are new 
features not supported in 2.1 :D


Are there plans to rebase FreeIPA to 2.2 in Fedora 16?

If not, then should I open a bug to fix up the Fedora 16 FreeIPA docs to 
point at the version which actually ships with it?


Thanks

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


[Freeipa-users] Doc. mixup

2012-05-21 Thread Chris Evich

Hi,

Not sure if this is the right place or not, but I noticed that the 
freeipa.org documentation link for 2.0 goes to 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html 
which is for version 2.1.3.


Freeipa 2.1.x is also what you get with Fedora 16, however the fedora 16 
docs at 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html 
show the version as 2.2 and as I've learned (the hard way) there are new 
features not supported in 2.1 :D


Are there plans to rebase FreeIPA to 2.2 in Fedora 16?

If not, then should I open a bug to fix up the Fedora 16 FreeIPA docs to 
point at the version which actually ships with it?


Thanks

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users