Re: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 final (yet)

2014-03-01 Thread Anthony Messina
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 05:42:27 AM Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> an update on the issue of upgrading Fedora 19 to Fedora 20 for FreeIPA
> deployments.
> 
> An updated 389-ds-base package, 1.3.2.9-1.fc20 is in updates-testing
> repository.  Updated slapi-nis package, 0.52-1.fc20, is in updates-testing
> as well.
> 
> I've tested that using fedora-upgrade tool to upgrade from Fedora 19 to
> Fedora 20 does work if you have updates-testing repository enabled and that
> FreeIPA is continuing to work afterwards.
> 
> I've initiated move of 389-ds-base to updates stable repository. Once it
> reach out there,  I'll lift a warning on freeipa.org and publish a final
> update.
> 
> Happy holidays!
> 
> - Original Message -
> 
> > From: "Alexander Bokovoy" 
> > To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:14:34 AM
> > Subject: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments
> > to   Fedora 20 final (yet)>
> > 
> >
> > Greetings!
> >
> > 
> >
> > As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today,
> > Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading
> > your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check
> > Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
> > for the complete list of issues.
> >
> > 
> >
> > FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces
> > new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements,
> > unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in
> > Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain
> > conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations
> > due to these consequences.
> >
> > 
> >
> > As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow
> > developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be
> > some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will  appear in Fedora
> > 20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation.
> >
> > 
> >
> > I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and
> > packages
> > pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository.
> >
> > 
> >
> > --
> > / Alexander Bokovoy

I've been waiting patiently for F20 to "settle" before upgrading my two VM 
installations of FreeIPA:

ipa1 (original master)
ipa2 (clone)

I'm considering doing a "yum upgrade" this weekend and was wondering if any 
users had found any "gotchas"?  One that I can think of is the addition of the 
following in F20's default /etc/krb5.conf:

[libdefaults]
  ...
  default_ccache_name = KEYRING:persistent:%{uid}
  ...

I've seen on some of my freshly installed F20 FreeIPA clients that this option 
is no longer present after ipa-client-install.  On those clients, I've 
manually added it post client install and things seem to work OK with the 
exception of SELinux errors reported here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001703

Should I place this option in /etc/krb5.conf on the masters before/after the 
yum upgrade (or at all)?

Should I run "ipactl stop" prior to running the yum upgrade?

Of note, I'm considering the "yum upgrade" option rather than creating F20 
replicas of F19 masters due to:

https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/816
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47721

Any guidance is appreciated.  Thanks, and have a good weekend.

-A

-- 
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Re: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 final (yet)

2013-12-22 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
Hi,

an update on the issue of upgrading Fedora 19 to Fedora 20 for FreeIPA 
deployments.

An updated 389-ds-base package, 1.3.2.9-1.fc20 is in updates-testing 
repository. 
Updated slapi-nis package, 0.52-1.fc20, is in updates-testing as well.

I've tested that using fedora-upgrade tool to upgrade from Fedora 19 to Fedora 
20 does work
if you have updates-testing repository enabled and that FreeIPA is continuing 
to work afterwards.

I've initiated move of 389-ds-base to updates stable repository. Once it reach 
out there, 
I'll lift a warning on freeipa.org and publish a final update.

Happy holidays!

- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Bokovoy" 
> To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:14:34 AM
> Subject: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to   
> Fedora 20 final (yet)
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today,
> Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading
> your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check
> Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
> for the complete list of issues.
> 
> FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces
> new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements,
> unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in
> Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain
> conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations
> due to these consequences.
> 
> As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow
> developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be
> some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will  appear in Fedora
> 20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation.
> 
> I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and packages
> pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository.
> 
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy
> 
> ___
> Freeipa-users mailing list
> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
> 

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


Re: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 final (yet)

2013-12-17 Thread Alexander Bokovoy

On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, KodaK wrote:

I took a look at the bugs page and I didn't see it mentioned, but I'm
asking anyway:

is anyone aware of any client-side issues on fedora IRT IPA?  We have some
fedora workstations that auth against IPA in RHEL 6.

We are unaware of any problems with Fedora clients versus RHEL 6 IPA
server. Obviously, some IPA CLI commands will not work against the older
server but still will be visible in the CLI help, but the rest should be
working.


--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


Re: [Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 final (yet)

2013-12-17 Thread KodaK
I took a look at the bugs page and I didn't see it mentioned, but I'm
asking anyway:

is anyone aware of any client-side issues on fedora IRT IPA?  We have some
fedora workstations that auth against IPA in RHEL 6.


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:

> Greetings!
>
> As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today,
> Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading
> your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check
> Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
> for the complete list of issues.
>
> FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces
> new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements,
> unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in
> Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain
> conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations
> due to these consequences.
>
> As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow
> developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be
> some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will  appear in Fedora
> 20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation.
>
> I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and packages
> pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository.
>
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy
>
> ___
> Freeipa-users mailing list
> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>



-- 
The government is going to read our mail anyway, might as well make it
tough for them.  GPG Public key ID:  B6A1A7C6
___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

[Freeipa-users] WARNING: Do not upgrade FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 final (yet)

2013-12-17 Thread Alexander Bokovoy

Greetings!

As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today,
Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading
your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check
Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
for the complete list of issues.

FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces
new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements,
unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in
Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain
conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations
due to these consequences.

As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow
developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be
some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will  appear in Fedora
20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation.

I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and packages
pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository.

--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users