Re: CHAP problem
- Original Message - From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 4:13 PM Subject: Re: CHAP problem =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pascal_S=E9guy?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that the proxy doesn't know the attribute CHAP-Challenge, and takes the challenge directly from the vector field, as says the RFC when the CHAP-challenge is not provided by the NAS. The program is broken. It's hjorribly broken, and should be fixed. You mean that the remote radius (proxy) is broken ? some could think FR is broken :) The solution is to copy the CHAP-Challenge in the vector when proxying. Someone think about undesirable side effects with doing this ? It will work for you, but that patch will never go into the server. You find it so ugly ? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: rlm_attr_filter
- Original Message - From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:50 PM Subject: Re: rlm_attr_filter =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pascal_S=E9guy?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am asking myself how rlm_attr_filter can work since it has only an 'authorize' method called before the realm stuff. Why is this module not called in the post-proxy section ? Because no one has supplied a patch to make it do that. ?? this means this nice module can't serve anything as is ? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
static radiusd
Hello, Is there a way to build a static version of freeradius ? (with all rlm linked in radiusd). - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: static radiusd
- Original Message - From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:26 PM Subject: Re: static radiusd =?Windows-1252?Q?Pascal_S=E9guy?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to build a static version of freeradius ? (with all rlm linked in radiusd). Yes, but it requires some editing of the Makefiles. We still haven't finalized all of the magic required to link it statically. I realize now it works! radiusd is still dynamicaly linked, but my rlm is inside. I have understood this when I was not able any more to update my rlm by a make install in modules/my_rlm. I don't really know why I am now in static because it's the result of experiments of last week. maybe: configure --enable-shared=no ? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html