Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Ken Roser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have to write messages such as this? My experience has been that unless I ask for specific information about a problem, then that information is rarely posted to the list. This means that someone has run into a problem, they've said publicly that there's a problem, but they're not interested in getting it fixed, or in helping other people fix it. That's incredibly annoying, as I hope you'll understand. I fail to understand why you said that a problem existed, but you didn't show interest in getting it fixed. And I also fail to understand why you got upset when I pointed out that discrepancy. All I did was ask if something was fixed and I volunteered to do any work necessary to resolve it. It this had been declared fixed and I still had a problem I sure would have posted errors. I don't appreciate this type of reaction from you. shrug I'm sorry if I offended you. The EAP related SEGV on Solaris has been fixed, and has been reported to the list as fixed. Your other comment about the CVS build wouldn't even compile is what prompted my response. If it won't compile, DESCRIBE why it won't compile, otherwise it won't be fixed! Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Ken Roser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has this segmentation fault on Solaris 8 been fixed yet? I tried to build last night's CVS build but it wouldn't even compile. I'm still using version .5 as a result. Errors are... ?? No one can do anything to help you if you say stuff went wrong, and give no useful information. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
I used today's (04/04/2002) snapshot and everything is working great as far as EAP/MD5 is concerned. In order to get it to build though, I had to rename the modules/rlm_ippool directory to something that didn't start with rlm_ in order to get the build to skip building this module which would fail to build otherwise. Raghu wrote: Ken Roser wrote: Has this segmentation fault on Solaris 8 been fixed yet? I tried to build last night's CVS build but it wouldn't even compile. I'm still using version .5 as a result. If it hasn't been fixed, let me know what needs to be done and I'll be glad to assist in the debugging. Seg fault is already fixed. Try to compile and run the freeradius from the latest CVS snapshots and post your feedback. -- (( )) | |.| HereUAre !! |_| (( Raghu )) - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Alan, Why do you have to write messages such as this? All I did was ask if something was fixed and I volunteered to do any work necessary to resolve it. It this had been declared fixed and I still had a problem I sure would have posted errors. I don't appreciate this type of reaction from you. Alan DeKok wrote: Ken Roser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has this segmentation fault on Solaris 8 been fixed yet? I tried to build last night's CVS build but it wouldn't even compile. I'm still using version .5 as a result. Errors are... ?? No one can do anything to help you if you say stuff went wrong, and give no useful information. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Has this segmentation fault on Solaris 8 been fixed yet? I tried to build last night's CVS build but it wouldn't even compile. I'm still using version .5 as a result. If it hasn't been fixed, let me know what needs to be done and I'll be glad to assist in the debugging. Alan DeKok wrote: Siddharth Jeevan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I try to run freeradius with EAP-MD5 as the auth-type, I get a segmentation fault. I applied the changes Raghu had suggested in the eap_wireformat method in the file.c on 03/21/2002, but that would not help me. Try grabbing the CVS snapshot from tonight. I've committed those changes to the head, along with a few others that I think Radhu didn't post. If that still core dumps, then a stack backtrace would help. See 'doc/bugs' Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Siddharth Jeevan wrote: (a) Can we not use Windows 2000 RRAS as NAS - if this is true? What Radius Server is independent of NAS. will I have to do? Build another version of eap.c? My scenario I donot think so. I think there is a bug in rlm_eap that needs to be fixed. requires me to send Auth request over PPP not 802.1x PPP or 802.1x doesnot matter. It should work on both. (b) Does it appear to be another problem with the code in EAP module? Yes. It appears to me that my patch didnot fix the problem completely. If you are interested in identifying the problem, Place more debugging statements in eap_compose() and send the output. -Raghu - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: EAP-MD5 seg fault on Solaris 8
Siddharth Jeevan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I try to run freeradius with EAP-MD5 as the auth-type, I get a segmentation fault. I applied the changes Raghu had suggested in the eap_wireformat method in the file.c on 03/21/2002, but that would not help me. Try grabbing the CVS snapshot from tonight. I've committed those changes to the head, along with a few others that I think Radhu didn't post. If that still core dumps, then a stack backtrace would help. See 'doc/bugs' Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
