Re: PEAP Support

2003-01-29 Thread Alan DeKok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I`d like to know if there is some development to integrate PEAP support into
 freeradius ?

  Not at this time.  People have been asking that question for over a
year on the list, and no one has volunteered to do the work.

  You can always try paying a programmer to do the work.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



RE: PEAP support

2003-01-10 Thread Lars Viklund

 From: Paul Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: den 20 december 2002 19:48
 To: Freeradius-Users@Lists. Cistron. Nl
 Subject: PEAP support
 
 
 Lars,
 
   I got stuck at part-II. After the server send the first 
 packet (Request for Identity, after confirm with Microsoft it 
 is one byte of value 1) in the TLS channel, there is no 
 response from XP client. Any chance you might look into this 
 in near future such that we might team up together to work 
 this out? or someone else might be interested in tackling 
 this? Thanks.

Hi,

I apologize for not answering earlier. I've been on vacation and busy with other stuff.

We are interested in working with you on this, although we cannot spent a lot of time 
on it. If you send us you code we will take at look at it next week and see if we can 
provide any help.

--
Lars Viklund
Expert Software Engineer
Embedded Platforms
Axis Communications AB

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



RE: PEAP support

2002-12-12 Thread Lars Viklund

 From: Ynjiun P. Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: den 12 december 2002 00:51
 To: Freeradius-Users@Lists. Cistron. Nl
 Subject: PEAP support
 
 
 Lars
 
   I am using the EAP-TLS code base and tweek it to work 
 up to the point of finishing PEAP Part I. Now XP can talk to 
 my prototype up to the Part I. 

Cool!

 Now I am getting into the Part 
 II to send EAP packet under TLS tunnel. Could you suggest 
 where to add the Part II code given the EAP-TLS code base? 
 and how to bootstrap EAP code assuming everything recursively 
 happening again? 

Sorry, I haven't had time to look closely at this. However, obviously you would like 
to hook into the rlm_eap module to be able to reuse the existing EAP machinery. I 
suspect you'll have to modify this module slightly to allow this.

 (PEAP is actually EAP-TLS-EAP, am I right?)

I guess you could say that it is EAP-TLS-EAP-X, where X is any EAP method.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: PEAP support

2002-11-24 Thread Lars Viklund
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 05:24, Artur Hecker wrote:
 i don't know if you are really interested in it, but PEAP [2]
 (protected EAP) is another MS-Cisco invention (built in in Windows XP
 SP1 instead of EAP/MD5 as kind of alternative for EAP/TLS). Nobody seems
 to know so far how it works but 

The basic idea is to run TLS inside EAP and then EAP again within the
TLS session. Thus it is fairly similar to EAP-TTLS and seems to give
about the same advantages (support for legacy authentication methods,
protection of the identity, etc.).

The ID you reference (-05 is the latest version) should be sufficient to
implement it.

 it probably gives mutual out and key
 negotiation

Yes.

 [2]
 http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-josefsson-pppext-eap-tls-eap-02.html



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: PEAP support

2002-11-23 Thread Alan DeKok
Ynjiun P. Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is FreeRadius going to support PEAP soon? Does any PEAP code have
 been written? Thanks.

  PEAP?  What's that?

  If you supply PEAP patches, it'll probably go in.  If you don't
supply paches, then probably not.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: PEAP support

2002-11-23 Thread Artur Hecker
hi Alan


i don't know if you are really interested in it, but PEAP [2]
(protected EAP) is another MS-Cisco invention (built in in Windows XP
SP1 instead of EAP/MD5 as kind of alternative for EAP/TLS). Nobody seems
to know so far how it works but you bet there will be more questions on
it (since it's in win xp[1]). it probably gives mutual out and key
negotiation, i didn't take a deeper look though.


ciao
artur


[1] i wonder if i gonna have more respect if i change my surname to
xp... :-)
[2]
http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-josefsson-pppext-eap-tls-eap-02.html


Alan wrote:
   PEAP?  What's that?
   If you supply PEAP patches, it'll probably go in.  If you don't
 supply paches, then probably not.


-- 
Artur Hecker
artur[at]hecker.info

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html