Re: stripping the prefixes for accounting

2001-10-23 Thread aland 

Bobi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is there simple way to use Stripped-User-Name for accounting.

  Yes... if it exists, it will go into the detail record.

 I'm trying to do something like:
 
 DEFAULT Prefix == pref
 User-Name := %{Stripped-User-Name}
 
 in acct_users file

  Uh, why?
 
 If acct_users works only with existing attributes

  Yes.  It only uses attributes which already exist in the request.

 there should be other way to strip prefixes for accounting ?

  Why do you want to strip the prefixes only for accounting?

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: stripping the prefixes for accounting

2001-10-23 Thread Bobi 

Hi Alan,
I'm migrating from heavy patched by me Livingston radius.
Freeradius is most configurable one I managed to find and it was really
easy (with 2-3 slight patches like %{raw:Attr-Name} in xlat anyway :) to
switch it for all my needs.

One of the very few things i still need to do is sql accounting for one
type of prefix to be done
with stripped User-Name. It will be nice sql accounting to be
configurable as easy as sql authentication. Possibility for calling
different sql accounting sub functions just like calling different sql
authentication subfunctions will be very handy.

One more thing I think isn't configurable enough in rlm_sql:
Only plain text and unix style encrypted passwords can be checked. Maybe
it's good idea to add external password checking. Someone may be using
sql password() or (like me) it's own password encrypting function.

Regards,
B.

[cut]
 If acct_users works only with existing attributes

  Yes.  It only uses attributes which already exist in the request.

 there should be other way to strip prefixes for accounting ?

  Why do you want to strip the prefixes only for accounting?

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html