Re: 2.0.3 - sites-enabled/inner-tunnel and sites-available/inner-tunnel

2008-03-18 Thread Alan DeKok 
David Wood wrote:
 In 2.0.3, raddb/Makefile now creates a for sites-enabled/inner-tunnel.
 However, sites-available/inner-tunnel, the destination of that link,
 isn't installed because it has been omitted from the definition of FILES
 in raddb/Makefile. Is this a mistake?

  Yes.

 If there's a problem here, I'll patch it in the FreeBSD port in
 anticipation of a FreeRADIUS fix in 2.0.4.

  I've committed a fix to raddb/Makefile.

  Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

2.0.3 - sites-enabled/inner-tunnel and sites-available/inner-tunnel

2008-03-17 Thread David Wood 

Hi there,

I'm working on updating the FreeBSD net/freeradius2 port to 2.0.3. As 
always, this makes me scrutinise the changes between versions.



In 2.0.3, raddb/Makefile now creates a for sites-enabled/inner-tunnel. 
However, sites-available/inner-tunnel, the destination of that link, 
isn't installed because it has been omitted from the definition of FILES 
in raddb/Makefile. Is this a mistake?


If sites-available/inner-tunnel has been mistakenly omitted from FILES 
in raddb/Makefile, what about sites-available/copy-acct-to-home-server, 
sites-available/proxy-inner-tunnel, sites-available/buffered-sql and 
sites-available/vmps? Should they all be in FILES as well?



If there's a problem here, I'll patch it in the FreeBSD port in 
anticipation of a FreeRADIUS fix in 2.0.4.



Best wishes,




David
--
David Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html