Re: SNMP error
Hi Alan, Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ?? Thanks Amr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, just a quick check... the smux.c patches ARE applied to the 2.0.x smux.c (but not part of the last 1.1.7 release). the radius_snmp.c patches - converting an int to a long (handling 64 bit better I'd guess)... havent been incorporated into the 2.0.x tree. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Amr el-Saeed wrote: Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ?? Ask redhat, or whoever is packaging your version of 1.1.7. All new development, including bug fixes, are on the 2.0 release. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi, Can't it be applied to 1.1.7 release, as there are many changes in the conf. files between 1.1.7 and 2.0 ?? it probably could be applied to 1.1.7 source archive if you build it yourself. your distro package maintainer, otherwise, could release a 1.1.7 package with these patches in. It could be applied to the main source - as that would then be a 1.1.8 release - which isnt likely to happen(*) alan (*) from what main developers have hinted: all work/effort is to be done on 2.0.x tree - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi Alan,
I have patches attached from RedHat for freeradius 1.1.3 .
Can we have a patched release from freeradius 1.1.7 ??
Thanks
Amr
Alan DeKok wrote:
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
I am also curious about the answer on this question ! Are there any plans to
implement AgentX protocol into freeradius project?
No plans.
At this point, the only plans for 2.0 are minor feature improvements
and bug fixes. I plan on spending time working on the book, unless
otherwise motivated.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
--- freeradius-1.1.3/src/main/smux.c.1819888 2008-05-15 15:05:49.0 +0100
+++ freeradius-1.1.3/src/main/smux.c 2008-05-15 16:17:30.0 +0100
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
int ret;
u_char buf[BUFSIZ];
u_char *ptr, *h1, *h1e, *h2, *h2e;
- int len, length;
+ size_t len, length;
ptr = buf;
len = BUFSIZ;
@@ -293,8 +293,8 @@
ret = send (rad_snmp.smux_fd, buf, length, 0);
}
-static char *
-smux_var (char *ptr, int len, oid objid[], size_t *objid_len,
+static u_char *
+smux_var (u_char *ptr, size_t len, oid objid[], size_t *objid_len,
size_t *var_val_len,
u_char *var_val_type,
void **var_value)
@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@
}
/* GET message header. */
-static char *
-smux_parse_get_header (char *ptr, size_t *len, long *reqid)
+static u_char *
+smux_parse_get_header (u_char *ptr, size_t *len, long *reqid)
{
u_char type;
long errstat;
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@
}
static void
-smux_parse_set (char *ptr, size_t len, int action)
+smux_parse_set (u_char *ptr, size_t len, int action)
{
long reqid;
oid my_oid[MAX_OID_LEN];
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@
}
static void
-smux_parse_get (char *ptr, size_t len, int exact)
+smux_parse_get (u_char *ptr, size_t len, int exact)
{
long reqid;
oid my_oid[MAX_OID_LEN];
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@
/* Parse SMUX_CLOSE message. */
static void
-smux_parse_close (char *ptr, int len)
+smux_parse_close (u_char *ptr, int len)
{
long reason = 0;
@@ -692,9 +692,9 @@
/* SMUX_RRSP message. */
static void
-smux_parse_rrsp (char *ptr, int len)
+smux_parse_rrsp (u_char *ptr, size_t len)
{
- char val;
+ u_char val;
long errstat;
ptr = asn_parse_int (ptr, len, val, errstat, sizeof (errstat));
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@
/* Parse SMUX message. */
static int
-smux_parse (char *ptr, int len)
+smux_parse (u_char *ptr, size_t len)
{
/* this buffer we'll use for SOUT message. We could allocate it with malloc and
save only static pointer/lenght, but IMHO static buffer is a faster solusion */
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
int
smux_read ()
{
- int len;
+ ssize_t len;
u_char buf[SMUXMAXPKTSIZE];
int ret;
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@
DEBUG2 (SMUX read len: %d, len);
/* Parse the message. */
- ret = smux_parse (buf, len);
+ ret = smux_parse (buf, (size_t) len);
if (ret 0) {
close (rad_snmp.smux_fd);
@@ -854,8 +854,8 @@
{
u_char buf[BUFSIZ];
u_char *ptr;
- int len;
- u_long smux_proto_version;
+ size_t len;
+ long smux_proto_version;
u_char rad_progname[] = radiusd;
smux_oid_dump (SMUX open oid, smux_oid, smux_oid_len);
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@
ptr = asn_build_string (ptr, len,
(u_char)
(ASN_UNIVERSAL | ASN_PRIMITIVE | ASN_OCTET_STR),
- rad_snmp.smux_password, strlen(rad_snmp.smux_password));
+ (u_char *) rad_snmp.smux_password, strlen(rad_snmp.smux_password));
/* Fill in real SMUX header. We exclude ASN header size (2). */
len = BUFSIZ;
@@ -904,7 +904,8 @@
{
u_char buf[BUFSIZ];
u_char *ptr;
- int len, ret;
+ size_t len;
+ ssize_t ret;
long priority;
long operation;
struct subtree *subtree;
@@ -956,7 +957,7 @@
int
smux_connect ()
{
- int ret;
+ ssize_t ret;
rad_snmp.smux_event=SMUX_NONE;
DEBUG2 (SMUX connect try %d, rad_snmp.smux_failures + 1);
--- freeradius-1.1.3/src/main/radius_snmp.c.type_long 2008-05-15 23:52:29.0 +0100
+++ freeradius-1.1.3/src/main/radius_snmp.c 2008-05-15 23:52:37.0 +0100
@@ -296,12 +296,12 @@
case RADIUSACCSERVUPTIME:
rad_snmp.acct.uptime = (time(NULL) - rad_snmp.acct.start_time) * 100;
- *var_len = sizeof(int32_t);
+ *var_len = sizeof(long);
return (unsigned char *) rad_snmp.acct.uptime;
case RADIUSACCSERVRESETTIME:
rad_snmp.acct.reset_time = (time(NULL) - rad_snmp.acct.last_reset_time) * 100;
- *var_len = sizeof(int32_t);
+ *var_len = sizeof(long);
return (unsigned char *) rad_snmp.acct.reset_time;
case RADIUSACCSERVCONFIGRESET:
@@ -310,39 +310,39 @@
return (unsigned char *) result;
case RADIUSACCSERVTOTALREQUESTS:
- *var_len = sizeof(int32_t);
+ *var_len = sizeof(long);
return (unsigned char *) rad_snmp.acct.total_requests;
case RADIUSACCSERVTOTALINVALIDREQUESTS:
- *var_len = sizeof(int32_t);
+ *var_len = sizeof(long);
return (unsigned char *) rad_snmp.acct.total_invalid_requests;
case RADIUSACCSERVTOTALDUPREQUESTS:
- *var_len = sizeof(int32_t);
+ *var_len = sizeof(long);
return (unsigned char *)
Re: SNMP error
hi, just a quick check... the smux.c patches ARE applied to the 2.0.x smux.c (but not part of the last 1.1.7 release). the radius_snmp.c patches - converting an int to a long (handling 64 bit better I'd guess)... havent been incorporated into the 2.0.x tree. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
RE: SNMP error
Hello, I am also curious about the answer on this question ! Are there any plans to implement AgentX protocol into freeradius project? Alan? Kind regards, E:S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] g] On Behalf Of Amr el-Saeed Sent: Dienstag, 05. Februar 2008 09:05 To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: SNMP error Hi, any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit?? Amr el-Saeed wrote: Dear Alan, i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org i suspected the 64-bit i made several trials , and here is the result freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL3 , 32-bit working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 32-bit working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 64-bit NOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 32-bit NOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 64-bit NOT working any comments ?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i have OS RHEL5 it looks like it didnt build with the required debug parts - once again, as you are using the SPEC for your distro they could have other things that mess it up - I can only help if you build from the source and leave package management stuff alone. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi, any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit?? Amr el-Saeed wrote: Dear Alan, i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org i suspected the 64-bit i made several trials , and here is the result freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL3 , 32-bit working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 32-bit working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 64-bit NOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 32-bit NOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 64-bit NOT working any comments ?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i have OS RHEL5 it looks like it didnt build with the required debug parts - once again, as you are using the SPEC for your distro they could have other things that mess it up - I can only help if you build from the source and leave package management stuff alone. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Amr el-Saeed wrote: any suggestions about what to do to make snmp work on 64-bit?? Debug it and submit a patch. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Edvin Seferovic wrote: I am also curious about the answer on this question ! Are there any plans to implement AgentX protocol into freeradius project? No plans. At this point, the only plans for 2.0 are minor feature improvements and bug fixes. I plan on spending time working on the book, unless otherwise motivated. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Dear Alan, i build from the source file that i downloaded from freeradius.org i suspected the 64-bit i made several trials , and here is the result freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL3 , 32-bitworking freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 32-bitworking freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.20 , RHEL5 , 64-bitNOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 32-bitNOT working freeradius-1.1.7 , snmp-5.3.1-19.el5 , RHEL5 , 64-bitNOT working any comments ?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i have OS RHEL5 it looks like it didnt build with the required debug parts - once again, as you are using the SPEC for your distro they could have other things that mess it up - I can only help if you build from the source and leave package management stuff alone. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
i have OS RHEL5 Amr el-Saeed wrote: Hi Alan, yes, i'm sure i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !! and ideas ?? thanks for help (gdb) set logging file gdb-radiusd.log (gdb) set logging on Copying output to gdb-radiusd.log. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/sbin/radiusd (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912546236704 (LWP 5584)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Wed Jan 23 15:46:53 2008 : Info: Starting - reading configuration files ... (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program exited normally. (gdb) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i followed the bugs file. i recompiled the freeradius with --enable-developer actually i made RPM file with ( rpmbuild -ta freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz ) are you SURE That this worked fine - as if you used the standard SPEC then you wouldnt enable the developer stuff. (no debugging symbols found) you also need to ensure your kernel is built with debugging support alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi, i have OS RHEL5 it looks like it didnt build with the required debug parts - once again, as you are using the SPEC for your distro they could have other things that mess it up - I can only help if you build from the source and leave package management stuff alone. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Amr el-Saeed wrote: i have OS RHEL5 yes, i'm sure i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !! made RPM file with ( rpmbuild -ta freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz ) rpmbuild creates a separate package with the debugging information. You need to install the debuginfo rpm which was created in addition to the other rpms it created to get the debugging symbols, etc. I doubt you'll need a kernel with debugging. -- John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi Alan, yes, i'm sure i added the option in the SPEC file and then build the RPM and about the second issue , i didn't have a debugging kernel but i got one and install it and boot with it and got the same output !! and ideas ?? thanks for help (gdb) set logging file gdb-radiusd.log (gdb) set logging on Copying output to gdb-radiusd.log. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/sbin/radiusd (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912546236704 (LWP 5584)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Wed Jan 23 15:46:53 2008 : Info: Starting - reading configuration files ... (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program exited normally. (gdb) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i followed the bugs file. i recompiled the freeradius with --enable-developer actually i made RPM file with ( rpmbuild -ta freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz ) are you SURE That this worked fine - as if you used the standard SPEC then you wouldnt enable the developer stuff. (no debugging symbols found) you also need to ensure your kernel is built with debugging support alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi, i followed the bugs file. i recompiled the freeradius with --enable-developer actually i made RPM file with ( rpmbuild -ta freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz ) are you SURE That this worked fine - as if you used the standard SPEC then you wouldnt enable the developer stuff. (no debugging symbols found) you also need to ensure your kernel is built with debugging support alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
hi alan, i searched the freeradius.org for the debug instructions, but i found nothing. what do you mean exactly by debug instructions i already have this in the radius debug mode SMUX read start SMUX connection closed: 66 SMUX connect try 1 SMUX open oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3317.1.3.1 SMUX open progname: radiusd SMUX open password: yallasnmp SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.1.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.2.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 Waking up in 14 seconds... SMUX read start SMUX read len: 3 SMUX message received type: 0 rest len: 1 Unknown type: 0 Waking up in 14 seconds... SMUX read start SMUX connection closed: 66 SMUX connect try 1 SMUX open oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3317.1.3.1 SMUX open progname: radiusd SMUX open password: yallasnmp SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.1.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.2.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 Waking up in 14 seconds... thanks amr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, known SNMP issues with 64bit and that version of SNMP. you will need to follow the debug instructions to help debug alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
Hi, hi alan, i searched the freeradius.org for the debug instructions, but i found nothing. what do you mean exactly by debug instructions i already have this in the radius debug mode read doc/bugs in the distribution tar file. i can send you a copy if your archive doesnt contain it. beware that you will need an OS kernel that has all the debugging flags enabled (most default distro kernels are compiled in such a way) I have reported this bug to bugs.freeradius.org with the debug output that my system was able to generate alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:41:30 Amr el-Saeed wrote: but every time i wanted to snmpwalk from the radius i got that error RADIUS-AUTH-SERVER-MIB::radiusMIB = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID the command i execute is snmpwalk -v2c -c testsnmp -m /etc/raddb/RADIUS-AUTH-SERVER-MIB.txt localhost radius same command is working fine on the old machine. i searched for that on google but found nothing . any one can help ?? What does debug mode (-X) show? Are there any errors in your snmpd log file? Kevin Bonner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
this is the log [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57180 Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57181 Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:26 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57182 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57183 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57184 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57185 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57186 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: [smux_accept] accepted fd 12 from 127.0.0.1:57187 Jan 10 20:38:27 RADIUS-1-A snmpd[32488]: refused smux peer: oid SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3317.1.3.1, descr radiusd this is the debug mode SMUX read start SMUX connection closed: 66 SMUX connect try 1 SMUX open oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3317.1.3.1 SMUX open progname: radiusd SMUX open password: yallasnmp SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.1.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.2.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 Waking up in 14 seconds... SMUX read start SMUX read len: 3 SMUX message received type: 0 rest len: 1 Unknown type: 0 Waking up in 14 seconds... SMUX read start SMUX connection closed: 66 SMUX connect try 1 SMUX open oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3317.1.3.1 SMUX open progname: radiusd SMUX open password: yallasnmp SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.1.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 SMUX register oid: 1.3.6.1.2.1.67.2.1.1.1 SMUX register priority: -1 SMUX register operation: 1 Waking up in 14 seconds... Kevin Bonner wrote: On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:41:30 Amr el-Saeed wrote: but every time i wanted to snmpwalk from the radius i got that error RADIUS-AUTH-SERVER-MIB::radiusMIB = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID the command i execute is snmpwalk -v2c -c testsnmp -m /etc/raddb/RADIUS-AUTH-SERVER-MIB.txt localhost radius same command is working fine on the old machine. i searched for that on google but found nothing . any one can help ?? What does debug mode (-X) show? Are there any errors in your snmpd log file? Kevin Bonner - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: SNMP error
hi, known SNMP issues with 64bit and that version of SNMP. you will need to follow the debug instructions to help debug alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
