Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release

2005-09-14 Thread Ilia Chipitsine 

Ilia Chipitsine wrote:


When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?


The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues
with this module.

http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227


in the end of that discussion there's rewritten rlm_python.c

if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?



--
Nicolas Baradakis

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release

2005-09-14 Thread Alan DeKok 
Ilia Chipitsine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?

  Because the primary FreeRADIUS developers don't use python.

  Please use the updated module yourself, and if it works for you,
email the list and say so.

  If no one says that the new module is better, it won't go in.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: status of rlm_python in 1.1.0 release

2005-09-11 Thread Nicolas Baradakis 
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:

 When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
 for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?

The module rlm_python is still experimental. There are known issues
with this module.

http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html