Re: Redundant Proxy for Authentication
Thanks Alan. We will rework our use case then :) On 2012-08-22 1:46 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: Francois Gaudreault wrote: On each requests, we want to proxy it to a primary server, if it's succeeding, move on, but if the authentication fails, we need to proxy to a secondary server. It's not fail-over we are looking for. RADIUS doesn't really work that way. The only way to do it is via some severe re-architecting of the server internals. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html -- Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr fgaudrea...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: Redundant Proxy for Authentication
Francois Gaudreault wrote: > On each requests, we want to proxy it to a primary server, if it's > succeeding, move on, but if the authentication fails, we need to proxy > to a secondary server. It's not fail-over we are looking for. RADIUS doesn't really work that way. The only way to do it is via some severe re-architecting of the server internals. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Redundant Proxy for Authentication
Hi, I want to know if it's possible to proxy authentication request in a redundant fashion (just like we can do with ldap or mysql modules in a redundant block). On each requests, we want to proxy it to a primary server, if it's succeeding, move on, but if the authentication fails, we need to proxy to a secondary server. It's not fail-over we are looking for. Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr fgaudrea...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
