Re: [Freesurfer] Editing pial surface

2005-09-12 Thread Brian T. Quinn

hi Lars-

perhaps you need to delete more voxels. make sure you're editting the 
brain volume, and you can just run make_final_surfaces if you only 
want to regenerate a new pial surface (takes [a lot] less time).


thanks,
brian

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Lars Tjelta Westlye wrote:


Dear all,

I am trying to edit the pial surface by editing/deleting voxels in the
brain volume within the pial surface ('labeled' as a part of cortex), but
clearly are parts of dura when manually inspected. When I rerun the last
automatic procedures (fix, make_final, morph), and check the pial surface,
nothing has appeared to have changed. The voxels I deleted are gone,
though the pial surface still looks the same.

How can I fix this without having to regenerate/reconstruct all my
subjects? (I have approx. 100). Any tip?

I am by the way using the Freesurfer version from june (?) 2005, and due
to time restrictions I am not considering changing to the latest version
for this project.

Thanks a lot!


Best wishes,

Lars Tjelta Westlye
University of Oslo

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer





--
brian t. quinn

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Editing pial surface

2005-09-12 Thread Doug Greve


better to do it from inside recon-all so as to get it's bookkeeping. Run 
with -finalsurfs


doug



Brian T. Quinn wrote:


hi Lars-

perhaps you need to delete more voxels. make sure you're editting the 
brain volume, and you can just run make_final_surfaces if you only 
want to regenerate a new pial surface (takes [a lot] less time).


thanks,
brian

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Lars Tjelta Westlye wrote:


Dear all,

I am trying to edit the pial surface by editing/deleting voxels in the
brain volume within the pial surface ('labeled' as a part of cortex), 
but

clearly are parts of dura when manually inspected. When I rerun the last
automatic procedures (fix, make_final, morph), and check the pial 
surface,

nothing has appeared to have changed. The voxels I deleted are gone,
though the pial surface still looks the same.

How can I fix this without having to regenerate/reconstruct all my
subjects? (I have approx. 100). Any tip?

I am by the way using the Freesurfer version from june (?) 2005, and due
to time restrictions I am not considering changing to the latest version
for this project.

Thanks a lot!


Best wishes,

Lars Tjelta Westlye
University of Oslo

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer








--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 
Fax: 617-726-7422


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


[Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation

2005-09-12 Thread Bosky Ravindranath
To Bruce Fischl and List,
I just wanted to know if the subcortical segmentation featurehas been released.
Thanks,
Bosky
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

RE: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation

2005-09-12 Thread Fornito, Alexander
I thought the recent version, eg., 
freesurfer-Linux-rh7.3-dev20050912-full.tar.gz  did the subcortical 
segmentation. I've run it on a couplde of brains so far and it seems to be ok. 
Are there still some bugs with it?
 

-Original Message- 
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tue 9/13/2005 5:45 AM 
To: Bosky Ravindranath 
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation



not quite, sorry. We *really* don't want to release a version with major
problems, so we've been going through everything repeatedly trying to 
catch
everything. We're getting there.

Bruce


On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bosky Ravindranath wrote:

 To Bruce Fischl and List,
 I just wanted to know if the subcortical segmentation feature has been
 released.
 Thanks,
 Bosky

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


RE: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation

2005-09-12 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Alex,

that was a prerelease version. The subcortical stuff seems fine, but we 
have fixed a couple of small bugs in other things, so we are going to 
recommend that people rerun things with the new official release that we 
are hoping to be done with soon (note that rerunning won't involve any 
manual interactions).


Bruce

 On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:


I thought the recent version, eg., 
freesurfer-Linux-rh7.3-dev20050912-full.tar.gz  did the subcortical 
segmentation. I've run it on a couplde of brains so far and it seems to be ok. 
Are there still some bugs with it?


-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 9/13/2005 5:45 AM
To: Bosky Ravindranath
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation



not quite, sorry. We *really* don't want to release a version with major
problems, so we've been going through everything repeatedly trying to 
catch
everything. We're getting there.

Bruce


On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bosky Ravindranath wrote:

 To Bruce Fischl and List,
 I just wanted to know if the subcortical segmentation feature has been
 released.
 Thanks,
 Bosky

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


RE: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation

2005-09-12 Thread Bruce Fischl

yes, but they will be kept when you rerun.

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Fornito, 
Alexander wrote:



Fair enough. If recon-all is run without the subcortical segmentation, do 
manual edits to the wm volumes (eg., filling in ventricles, basal ganglia, etc) 
need to be performed?


-Original Message-
From:   Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Tue 9/13/2005 6:59 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: Bosky Ravindranath; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject:RE: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation
Hi Alex,

that was a prerelease version. The subcortical stuff seems fine, but we
have fixed a couple of small bugs in other things, so we are going to
recommend that people rerun things with the new official release that we
are hoping to be done with soon (note that rerunning won't involve any
manual interactions).

Bruce

 On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:


I thought the recent version, eg., 
freesurfer-Linux-rh7.3-dev20050912-full.tar.gz  did the subcortical 
segmentation. I've run it on a couplde of brains so far and it seems to be ok. 
Are there still some bugs with it?


-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 9/13/2005 5:45 AM
To: Bosky Ravindranath
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] subcortical segmentation



not quite, sorry. We *really* don't want to release a version with major
problems, so we've been going through everything repeatedly trying to 
catch
everything. We're getting there.

Bruce


On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bosky Ravindranath wrote:

 To Bruce Fischl and List,
 I just wanted to know if the subcortical segmentation feature has been
 released.
 Thanks,
 Bosky

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer













___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


[Freesurfer] large radius

2005-09-12 Thread Fornito, Alexander
HI,
I've got some 3T SPGR data (512 x 512 x 104, vox dim. 0.488 x 0.488 x 2). I 
seem to be able to convert them to .mgz ok, but when I run mri_watershed I get  
an error saying main radius too high (output below). Any ideas as to what's 
happening?
Thanks,
Alex


 mri_watershed 1001670.mgz 1001670_brain.mgz



The input file is 1001670.mgz
The output file is 1001670_brain.mgz
If this is incorrect, please exit quickly the program (Ctl-C)


*WATERSHED**
preflooding height equal to 25 percent
Sorting...
  first estimation of the COG coord: x=253 y=50 z=235 r=135
  first estimation of the main basin volume: 10415397 voxels
Error 
 main radius too high

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer