Re: [Freesurfer] Area measurement question
Hey Bruce, I'll use the average of the two. Thanks. -Morgan Bruce Fischl wrote: hmmm, I wrote something a while ago to generate a middle surface, but I'm not sure I would recommend it. It's kind of strange to be measuring the area of a surface that doesn't exist, isn't it? I would rather use the average of the two Bruce On Thu, 24 May 2007, Morgan Hough wrote: Thanks Bruce, These will give quite different values, right? Any chance of getting at the mid-thickness area? Cheers, -Morgan Bruce Fischl wrote: Hi Morgan, you get to choose. I think the default ?h.area file uses the ?h.white surface, but you can give mris_anatomical_stats whatever surface you want. I think we also by default compute an ?h.pial.area file. Bruce On Thu, 24 May 2007, Morgan Hough wrote: I just wanted to check which surface was used to compute area and which reference would have this information. Thanks in advance. Cheers, -Morgan ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
[Freesurfer] (no subject)
Hi, I have finished 3 demension data management by the Freesurfer software, but I do’t know how to compare the cortical thickness of the occipital lobe between the patient group and the control group. Could you tell me the way to deal with that? Thank you very much! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-5-25 ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
[Freesurfer] Turn Off Verbose Output
Howdy- I didn't see any flags in the help files, but are there some 'hidden' commands I could use to attenuate the verbosity of reg-feat2anat and aseg2feat? Thanks, Jim Porter TRiCAM Lab Coordinator Elliott Hall N437 612.624.3892 www.psych.umn.edu/research/tricam http://www.psych.umn.edu/research/tricam ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
[Freesurfer] White Matter Parcellation
Hello- In September of 2006 there was a post in which you mentioned that white matter parcellations were being fine-tuned but not yet ready. I'm really hoping to take advantage of the 3000 and 4000 level labels shown in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt, but I don't have them in my current parcellations that were created using FreeSurfer v3.0.3. Are there versions of the parcellation schemes available that I can upgrade to in order to obtain these finer white matter parcellations? Thanks, Jim Porter TRiCAM Lab Coordinator Elliott Hall N437 612.624.3892 www.psych.umn.edu/research/tricam ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] White Matter Parcellation
Hi James, we're hoping to release it along with a bunch of other things sometime this summer. cheers, Bruce On Fri, 25 May 2007, James Porter wrote: Hello- In September of 2006 there was a post in which you mentioned that white matter parcellations were being fine-tuned but not yet ready. I'm really hoping to take advantage of the 3000 and 4000 level labels shown in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt, but I don't have them in my current parcellations that were created using FreeSurfer v3.0.3. Are there versions of the parcellation schemes available that I can upgrade to in order to obtain these finer white matter parcellations? Thanks, Jim Porter TRiCAM Lab Coordinator Elliott Hall N437 612.624.3892 www.psych.umn.edu/research/tricam ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
