Re: [Freesurfer] tracking edits

2015-05-12 Thread Deirdre O Shea
Thanks alot!
Deirdre

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Nick Schmansky, MGH 
ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Deirdre,

 the -show-edits flag in recon-all will print edits.

 N.

 On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 12:29 -0400, Deirdre O Shea wrote:
  Dear Freesurfer experts,
 
 
  I wondered how I might be able to track all the edits I make on each
  subject e.g., how many control points etc. But most specifically if
  there was a way to see how much ,numerically, the image has changed
  with manual correction following the initial FreeSurfer run.
 
 
  Thanks in advance,
 
  Deirdre
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Interaction contrast setup

2015-05-12 Thread Sarah Banducci
I'm trying to see if two behavioral variables interact (they are factors 1
and 2) while controlling for the demographics also included in the fsgd
file. I would also like to run an interaction with age and factor1.

Here are the first few lines of my fsgd file.
Thanks

GroupDescriptorFile 1
Title STX
Class Male
Class Female
Variables Age_demeaned Edu_demeaned Factor1 Factor2
Input F01_1 Female -5.0889 1.8556 0.9 0.93
Input F02_1 Male 1.9111 -0.1444 0.85 0.85

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:

 what are you trying to test an interaction between? Can you send the
 first lines of your fsgd file?

 On 05/07/2015 10:41 AM, Sarah Banducci wrote:
  Hi all-
  I have been trying to determine the most appropriate way to set up an
  interaction contrast for glmfit. For my purposes I'm interested in
  looking at the interaction two performance variables while covarying
  demographics. I have 2 classes set to male and female and the first
  columns in my fsgd file are demeaned age and education.
 
  I have found 3 ways people suggest setting up an interaction contrast:
  1- Putting the contrast in one row:
  0 0 0 0 -.5 -.5 .5 .5
 
  2- Using two rows for the contrast:
  0 0 0 0 .5 .5 0 0
  0 0 0 0 0 0 .5 .5
 
  3- Creating an actual interaction term where the values are multiplied
  together in a new column of the fsgd file
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .5 .5
 
  I would be grateful to know how people set up this contrast. Also I
  would like to know how you run it (positive or negative) and
  subsequently how you interpret the results.
 
 
  Thanks,
  Sarah Banducci
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Taking a measure of cluster width and length on flat surface

2015-05-12 Thread Sarah Finnegan
Hi Bruce

Thanks for the information on the flat patch, thats great that the 
relationships are preserved!

With that in mind do you know if freesurfer has any inbuilt functions to take 
the kind of measurements that I was describing? Or will my MATLAB based 
proposal be the best option do you think?

Thanks again!
Sarah

From: Sarah Finnegan
Sent: 11 May 2015 17:13
To: Freesurfer support list ‎[freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]‎
Subject: Taking a measure of cluster width and length on flat surface

Dear all,

I am looking to take two measures within the visual cortex.
1) A measure of width and length for each activation cluster overlaid onto the 
flattened cortical surface.
2) A measure of spacing between each cluster

I can find how to take measures of area but I specifically want to know the 
width and length separately to correlate this to potential stripe systems.
My plan was to fit an oval to each of these clusters and measure length through 
the cardinal axis and width through the minor, spacing would be calculated from 
a line fit to the minor axis of each cluster. Unfortunately I think the 
unfolding process will have changed the spacing relationships between clusters 
to make this inappropriate.

I wonder if there is a command or established pipeline to take such measures?

Thanks for your help!
Sarah
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie,

mri_surf2surf is complaining that it cannot write out the annotation.

Just to clarify, is your subject called test_run_allindex? In other
words, is the variable s equal to test_run_allindex?

Does the directory /home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/ exist? If
not, then you first need to create the directory first, and then
mri_surf2surf can write the resulting annotation file into the
directory.

Cheers,
Thomas

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:46 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Professor Yeo :

We tried the code
 mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject $s --hemi lh
 --sval-annot

 $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/fsaverage/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 --tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/$s/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 However there came an error of could not write annot file
 /home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 No such file or directory
 And we checked our individual subject's label there isn't
 lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 Should we generate/import the lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot into our
 subjects/label first?
 What can we do ?
 Thank you very much!

 Best wishes,
 Annie


 2015-05-05 8:36 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo ytho...@csail.mit.edu:

 Hi Annie,

 Please cc the freesurfer list when you reply because there might be
 other people more qualified to answer your question.

 Based on what you are saying, I think you can first use mri_surf2surf
 (with the sval-annot flag) to transform the 2011 functional networks
 .annot file from fsaverage space to the subject's native surface
 space. Type mri_surf2surf --help to see examples.

 You can then use mris_anatomical_stats to compute thickness statistics.

 Cheers,
 Thomas

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:21 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
  Dear Pro. Yeo:
 
   Very appreciate for your reply !
 
  We are trying to use your definition of the functional network regions
  to
  re-parcellate our images
  and get the regions of volume or cortical thickness for our study
  interest
  of structural network.
  However, we did not want to re-run the first recon-all again due to it's
  spending to much time.
  And we are still can't find the way to solve this problem.
  Thank you very much for helping us!
 
  Best wishes,
  Annie Chen
 
  2015-05-02 8:25 GMT+08:00 Thomas Yeo ytho...@csail.mit.edu:
 
  Hi Yu-Chieh,
 
  I am cc-ing the freesurfer list who may help you with your issues.
 
  Can you explain what exactly you are trying do? The parcellation is
  released in different resolutions including fsaverage5. Why can't you
  just use the fsaverage5 parcellation?
 
  Cheers,
  Thomas
 
  On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:14 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
   Dear professor Yeo :
  
  My name is Yu-chieh Chen , I am a graduated student from National
   Taiwan
   University of medical school, and my supervisor is professor Susan
   Shur-Fen
   Gau from department of psychiatry, National Taiwan University
   Hospital 
   College of Medicine. We are very interesting about your paper
   published
   in
   2011 which using resting MRI to separate brain regions to functional
   networks. We'd like to use your percellation to re-separate the brain
   regions based on your released data in Freesurfer(
   http://ftp.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011).
   And
   use
   these volume of brain regions for our study, however, there comes the
   problem that we assumed that we can change the fsaverage into
   fsaverage5,
   thus we may get the new volume of the parcellation_Yeo. But it is not
   work.
   So I send this email for help. Last , I am very appreciate your
   kindness
   and
   very sorry for my inappropriate and rough.
   Thank you very much for read this email and sorry for occupied your
   time.
  
   Best wishes,
   Yu-chieh Chen
  
 
 



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Tracula reinit

2015-05-12 Thread Lars M. Rimol
Hi,

The various tracts have different default numbers of control points, with a
higher number for more curved paths. In a previous mail Dr. Yendiki
recommended changing the number of control points if several attempts
rerunning reinit don't produce a satisfactory result. Is it always better
to have a larger number of control points, except for the increase (I
assume) in processing time? Or will a larger number produce a worse result
for less curved tracts?





yours,

Lars M. Rimol, PhD
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Trondheim,
Norway
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Taking a measure of cluster width and length on flat surface

2015-05-12 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Sarah

I don't think we have anything for ellipsoid fitting, although Oliver 
Hinds did some in his paper on V1. Should be straightforward enough in 
matlab. The data are in 2D mm coords


cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 12 May 2015, Sarah Finnegan wrote:


Hi Bruce 
Thanks for the information on the flat patch, thats great that the
relationships are preserved! 

With that in mind do you know if freesurfer has any inbuilt functions to
take the kind of measurements that I was describing? Or will my MATLAB based
proposal be the best option do you think?

Thanks again!
Sarah 


From: Sarah Finnegan
Sent: 11 May 2015 17:13
To: Freesurfer support list ‎[freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]‎
Subject: Taking a measure of cluster width and length on flat surface

Dear all,
I am looking to take two measures within the visual cortex.
1) A measure of width and length for each activation cluster overlaid onto
the flattened cortical surface.
2) A measure of spacing between each cluster 

I can find how to take measures of area but I specifically want to know the
width and length separately to correlate this to potential stripe systems. 
My plan was to fit an oval to each of these clusters and measure length
through the cardinal axis and width through the minor, spacing would be
calculated from a line fit to the minor axis of each cluster. Unfortunately
I think the unfolding process will have changed the spacing relationships
between clusters to make this inappropriate. 

I wonder if there is a command or established pipeline to take such
measures?  

Thanks for your help!
Sarah 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie,

I assume this means 5202 is your subject ID? Maybe you should check if
/home/annie/test_run_allindex/5202/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
exist?

If so, you can run mris_anatomical_stats to generate statistics for
the parcellation.

Cheers,
Thomas

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:29 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Professor Yeo :
 After I rechecked the directory and run again mri_surf2surf
 I got the result:
 Saving target data
 Converting to target annot
 Saving to target annot
 /home/annie/test_run_allindex/5202/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 The file of 5202/label didn't come out with lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
 But it seems succeed, right?
 How can I get the stat of this parcellation ?

 Thank you very much!

 Best wishes,
 Annie

 2015-05-12 6:06 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo ytho...@csail.mit.edu:

 Hi Annie,

 mri_surf2surf is complaining that it cannot write out the annotation.

 Just to clarify, is your subject called test_run_allindex? In other
 words, is the variable s equal to test_run_allindex?

 Does the directory /home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/ exist? If
 not, then you first need to create the directory first, and then
 mri_surf2surf can write the resulting annotation file into the
 directory.

 Cheers,
 Thomas

 On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:46 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Professor Yeo :
 
 We tried the code
  mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject $s --hemi lh
  --sval-annot
 
 
  $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/fsaverage/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
  --tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/$s/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
  However there came an error of could not write annot file
  /home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
  No such file or directory
  And we checked our individual subject's label there isn't
  lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
  Should we generate/import the lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot into our
  subjects/label first?
  What can we do ?
  Thank you very much!
 
  Best wishes,
  Annie
 
 
  2015-05-05 8:36 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo ytho...@csail.mit.edu:
 
  Hi Annie,
 
  Please cc the freesurfer list when you reply because there might be
  other people more qualified to answer your question.
 
  Based on what you are saying, I think you can first use mri_surf2surf
  (with the sval-annot flag) to transform the 2011 functional networks
  .annot file from fsaverage space to the subject's native surface
  space. Type mri_surf2surf --help to see examples.
 
  You can then use mris_anatomical_stats to compute thickness statistics.
 
  Cheers,
  Thomas
 
  On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:21 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
   Dear Pro. Yeo:
  
Very appreciate for your reply !
  
   We are trying to use your definition of the functional network
   regions
   to
   re-parcellate our images
   and get the regions of volume or cortical thickness for our study
   interest
   of structural network.
   However, we did not want to re-run the first recon-all again due to
   it's
   spending to much time.
   And we are still can't find the way to solve this problem.
   Thank you very much for helping us!
  
   Best wishes,
   Annie Chen
  
   2015-05-02 8:25 GMT+08:00 Thomas Yeo ytho...@csail.mit.edu:
  
   Hi Yu-Chieh,
  
   I am cc-ing the freesurfer list who may help you with your issues.
  
   Can you explain what exactly you are trying do? The parcellation is
   released in different resolutions including fsaverage5. Why can't
   you
   just use the fsaverage5 parcellation?
  
   Cheers,
   Thomas
  
   On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:14 PM, 陳昱潔 poohann1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear professor Yeo :
   
   My name is Yu-chieh Chen , I am a graduated student from
National
Taiwan
University of medical school, and my supervisor is professor Susan
Shur-Fen
Gau from department of psychiatry, National Taiwan University
Hospital 
College of Medicine. We are very interesting about your paper
published
in
2011 which using resting MRI to separate brain regions to
functional
networks. We'd like to use your percellation to re-separate the
brain
regions based on your released data in Freesurfer(
   
http://ftp.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011).
And
use
these volume of brain regions for our study, however, there comes
the
problem that we assumed that we can change the fsaverage into
fsaverage5,
thus we may get the new volume of the parcellation_Yeo. But it is
not
work.
So I send this email for help. Last , I am very appreciate your
kindness
and
very sorry for my inappropriate and rough.
Thank you very much for read this email and sorry for occupied
your
time.
   
Best wishes,
Yu-chieh Chen
   
  
  
 
 



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



[Freesurfer] Whitening in FSFAST

2015-05-12 Thread Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
Hi Doug,
I wanted to ask what kind of noise model FSFAST employs for whitening.
Is it the one described in Worsley, neuroimage 2002?

Is there a place on the wiki or elsewhere where I could find a description?
Thanks,
Caspar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Freeview

2015-05-12 Thread Z K
Can you please provide me with the contents of your 
$FREESURFER_HOME/build-stamp.txt file?

-Zeke


On 05/11/2015 07:33 PM, Isabelle Deschamps wrote:
 Dear Freesurfer Users,

 I am trying to update the freeview file. However, I cannot find the
 folder $FREESURFER_HOME/Freeview.app/Contents/MacOS/Freeview

 When I go into my Freesurfer folder, I cannot find Freeview.app.

 Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 Thanks,

 Isabelle
 *
 Isabelle Deschamps,
 Chercheure postdoctorale,
 Faculté de Médecine
 Département de réadaptation
 Université Laval Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry
 1050 avenue de la Médecine Québec (Québec)
 G1V 0A6

 Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale
 de Québec (CRIUMSQ)
   2601, chemin de la Canardière, bureau F-2424A
 Québec (Québec) G1J 2G3
 Téléphone : 418 663-5000 poste 6857



 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation of hippocampal subfields / version 6.0 release date

2015-05-12 Thread Eugenio Iglesias
Hi Josh,
the module is already in the development version of FS, and will be released 
along with FS6 hopefully very soon.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Postdoctoral researcher BCBL
www.jeiglesias.com
www.bcbl.eu

Legal disclaimer/Aviso legal/Lege-oharra: www.bcbl.eu/legal-disclaimer


- Original Message -
From: Josh Gray jgray7...@gmail.com
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 1:33:32 PM
Subject: [Freesurfer] Segmentation of hippocampal subfields / version 6.0   
release date



Hello, 


I wanted to inquire about when you think that this new package for freesurfer 
6.0 will be complete? I am interested in pursuing hippocampal segmentation, but 
it seems that I should not use the segmentation from your older program and I 
should wait, would you agree? 


Thank you, 


Josh 

-- 

Josh Gray 
Graduate Student 
Psychology Dept. - Clinical Program 
Experimental  Clinical Psychopharmacology Laboratory 
University of Georgia 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation of hippocampal subfields / version 6.0 release date

2015-05-12 Thread Nick Schmansky, MGH
Josh,

You can get an FS version that is close to v6 here:

ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/dev

Any testing on top of the hippocampal fields functionality would be greatly 
appreciated!

Nick

 On May 12, 2015, at 5:42 AM, Eugenio Iglesias e.igles...@bcbl.eu wrote:
 
 Hi Josh,
 the module is already in the development version of FS, and will be released 
 along with FS6 hopefully very soon.
 Cheers,
 /Eugenio
 
 Juan Eugenio Iglesias
 Postdoctoral researcher BCBL
 www.jeiglesias.com
 www.bcbl.eu
 
 Legal disclaimer/Aviso legal/Lege-oharra: www.bcbl.eu/legal-disclaimer
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Gray jgray7...@gmail.com
 To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 1:33:32 PM
 Subject: [Freesurfer] Segmentation of hippocampal subfields / version 6.0 
 release date
 
 
 
 Hello, 
 
 
 I wanted to inquire about when you think that this new package for freesurfer 
 6.0 will be complete? I am interested in pursuing hippocampal segmentation, 
 but it seems that I should not use the segmentation from your older program 
 and I should wait, would you agree? 
 
 
 Thank you, 
 
 
 Josh 
 
 -- 
 
 Josh Gray 
 Graduate Student 
 Psychology Dept. - Clinical Program 
 Experimental  Clinical Psychopharmacology Laboratory 
 University of Georgia 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
 at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer