Re: [Freesurfer] qdec error message

2011-05-25 Thread Olivier Piguet
Hi Nick
I run Qdec 1.2 and all cases have been processed with 
freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.2.0
Olivier
On 25/05/2011, at 21:18, Nick Schmansky wrote:

> what version of freesurfer does this happen with?
> 
> n.
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 14:17 +1000, Olivier Piguet wrote:
>> Good afternoon, 
>> 
>> When running qdec, I receive the following error message:
>> 
>> Writing to 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/qdec/Untitled/contrasts.sig.mgh
>> reading group avg surface area 822 cm^2 from file
>> ERROR: could not find volume 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it 
>> exist?
>> Reading in average area 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.white.avg.area.mgh
>> reading group avg surface area 1041 cm^2 from file
>> ERROR: could not find volume 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it 
>> exist?
>> Reading in average area 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.pial.avg.area.mgh
>> reading group avg surface area 822 cm^2 from file
>> ERROR: could not find volume 
>> /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it 
>> exist?
>> 
>> I have run all subjects with qcache and I am using fsaverage. I have checked 
>> the files in the fsaverage folder. Although the file orig. does not exist, 
>> there is a file called orig.mgz in the mri folder. I have tried to rename 
>> this file (i.e., removing the 'mgz' part) but this did not remove the error. 
>> 
>> Any suggestion would be appreciated. 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Olivier Piguet
>> Neuroscience Research Australia
>> Sydney NSW, Australia
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


[Freesurfer] qdec error message

2011-05-24 Thread Olivier Piguet
Good afternoon, 

When running qdec, I receive the following error message:

Writing to /Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/qdec/Untitled/contrasts.sig.mgh
reading group avg surface area 822 cm^2 from file
ERROR: could not find volume 
/Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it exist?
Reading in average area 
/Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.white.avg.area.mgh
reading group avg surface area 1041 cm^2 from file
ERROR: could not find volume 
/Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it exist?
Reading in average area 
/Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.pial.avg.area.mgh
reading group avg surface area 822 cm^2 from file
ERROR: could not find volume 
/Volumes/workingdata/FTD/T1/subjects/fsaverage/surf/../mri/orig.  Does it exist?

I have run all subjects with qcache and I am using fsaverage. I have checked 
the files in the fsaverage folder. Although the file orig. does not exist, 
there is a file called orig.mgz in the mri folder. I have tried to rename this 
file (i.e., removing the 'mgz' part) but this did not remove the error. 

Any suggestion would be appreciated. 

Thanks

Olivier Piguet
Neuroscience Research Australia
Sydney NSW, Australia







___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] pial edit on atrophied temporal pole

2009-05-15 Thread Olivier Piguet
Thanks for the info. In severe cases of semantic dementia, you will  
see overall atrophy where the anterior temporal pole becomes almost  
non existent (combination of neuronal loss and white matter loss),  
probably also contributing to reduced white/grey differentiation.


Is there a way to manually trace the pial surface on these slices or  
not? Because I have a large group of patients with semantic dementia  
that I would like to process, I am likely to encounter this problem  
again in the future.


Thanks again for any suggestions and comments
Olivier

On 16/05/2009, at 0:20, Bruce Fischl wrote:

thanks Mike. Was it the same situation, where there is no nearby  
white matter? I guess I don't really understand the anatomy. Is  
there really a place where you have 10mm of gray matter with no  
underlying white matter? Or is it unmeylinated white matter that we  
just can't see?


On Fri, 15 May 2009, Michael Harms wrote:



As an aside, in a Alzheimer/ elderly cohort of ~250, we had 12  
subjects
that we had to exclude for what sounds like a very similar reason  
-- we

just couldn't get the pial surface in the anterior temporal lobe to
properly encapsulate the gray matter.

-Mike H.

On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 12:24 +1000, Olivier Piguet wrote:
That is correct. This is case of semantic dementia where left  
anterior

temporal region is markedly atrophic.
Olivier

On 15/05/2009, at 9:15, Bruce Fischl wrote:

so there's 10mm or so of gray matter with no underlying wm? I  
didn't

think that was ever the case. What pathology is this in? And you're
sure it's cortex, not amygdala? Jean: any thoughts?

On Fri, 15 May 2009, Olivier Piguet wrote:


Hi Bruce,
In the coronal plane, slice 152 is the last slice where white
matter is clearly visible. Then, slices 153-158, only grey matter
is recognised but not all of it,  and slices 159-164, grey matter
is not recognised at all.
I added control points  on slice 151-153 in the hope that it would
help but no luck.
Olivier

On 15/05/2009, at 8:39, Bruce Fischl wrote:


Hi Oliver,
how far away is the nearest white matter?
Bruce
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Olivier Piguet wrote:

Hi there,
I haven't received a reply to my question below.
Just to clarify, I ran autorecon1 and autorecon2 on this  
subject.
When examining the surfaces in tkmedit, the left temporal pole  
is

not included in the pial surface. Is there a way to force
freesurfer to recognise this as valid brain tissue, bearing in
mind that there is no visible white matter underneath (and
therefore the option of adding control points is not possible).
Thanks for any suggestion to resolve this problem.
Olivier
On 13/05/2009, at 12:57, Olivier Piguet wrote:

Hi there,
I've run autorecon2 on a subject who has significant unilateral
atrophy in the anterior temporal region. In the last few slices
anteriorly, the pial surface does not include what is clearly
atrophied cortical tissue without underlying white matter. What
is the method to correct for this? Looking at previous queries,
all of them refer to spots where one can manipulate the
segmentation by adding control points in the neighbouring white
matter, which is not present in this instance.
Any suggestion appreciated.
Olivier
~
Olivier Piguet Ph.D.
NHMRC Fellow (Clinical Career Development Award)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer UNSW
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia
Voice: +61 2 9399 1113
Fax: +61 2 9399 1047
E-mail: o.pig...@powmri.edu.au

http://www.ftdrg.org/
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] pial edit on atrophied temporal pole

2009-05-14 Thread Olivier Piguet
That is correct. This is case of semantic dementia where left anterior  
temporal region is markedly atrophic.

Olivier

On 15/05/2009, at 9:15, Bruce Fischl wrote:

so there's 10mm or so of gray matter with no underlying wm? I didn't  
think that was ever the case. What pathology is this in? And you're  
sure it's cortex, not amygdala? Jean: any thoughts?


On Fri, 15 May 2009, Olivier Piguet wrote:


Hi Bruce,
In the coronal plane, slice 152 is the last slice where white  
matter is clearly visible. Then, slices 153-158, only grey matter  
is recognised but not all of it,  and slices 159-164, grey matter  
is not recognised at all.
I added control points  on slice 151-153 in the hope that it would  
help but no luck.

Olivier

On 15/05/2009, at 8:39, Bruce Fischl wrote:


Hi Oliver,
how far away is the nearest white matter?
Bruce
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Olivier Piguet wrote:

Hi there,
I haven't received a reply to my question below.
Just to clarify, I ran autorecon1 and autorecon2 on this subject.  
When examining the surfaces in tkmedit, the left temporal pole is  
not included in the pial surface. Is there a way to force  
freesurfer to recognise this as valid brain tissue, bearing in  
mind that there is no visible white matter underneath (and  
therefore the option of adding control points is not possible).

Thanks for any suggestion to resolve this problem.
Olivier
On 13/05/2009, at 12:57, Olivier Piguet wrote:

Hi there,
I've run autorecon2 on a subject who has significant unilateral  
atrophy in the anterior temporal region. In the last few slices  
anteriorly, the pial surface does not include what is clearly  
atrophied cortical tissue without underlying white matter. What  
is the method to correct for this? Looking at previous queries,  
all of them refer to spots where one can manipulate the  
segmentation by adding control points in the neighbouring white  
matter, which is not present in this instance.

Any suggestion appreciated.
Olivier
~~~~~
Olivier Piguet Ph.D.
NHMRC Fellow (Clinical Career Development Award)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer UNSW
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia
Voice: +61 2 9399 1113
Fax: +61 2 9399 1047
E-mail: o.pig...@powmri.edu.au

http://www.ftdrg.org/
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] pial edit on atrophied temporal pole

2009-05-14 Thread Olivier Piguet

Hi Bruce,
In the coronal plane, slice 152 is the last slice where white matter  
is clearly visible. Then, slices 153-158, only grey matter is  
recognised but not all of it,  and slices 159-164, grey matter is not  
recognised at all.
I added control points  on slice 151-153 in the hope that it would  
help but no luck.

Olivier

On 15/05/2009, at 8:39, Bruce Fischl wrote:


Hi Oliver,

how far away is the nearest white matter?

Bruce
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Olivier Piguet wrote:


Hi there,
I haven't received a reply to my question below.

Just to clarify, I ran autorecon1 and autorecon2 on this subject.  
When examining the surfaces in tkmedit, the left temporal pole is  
not included in the pial surface. Is there a way to force  
freesurfer to recognise this as valid brain tissue, bearing in mind  
that there is no visible white matter underneath (and therefore the  
option of adding control points is not possible).


Thanks for any suggestion to resolve this problem.

Olivier
On 13/05/2009, at 12:57, Olivier Piguet wrote:


Hi there,
I've run autorecon2 on a subject who has significant unilateral  
atrophy in the anterior temporal region. In the last few slices  
anteriorly, the pial surface does not include what is clearly  
atrophied cortical tissue without underlying white matter. What is  
the method to correct for this? Looking at previous queries, all  
of them refer to spots where one can manipulate the segmentation  
by adding control points in the neighbouring white matter, which  
is not present in this instance.

Any suggestion appreciated.
Olivier
~~~~~
Olivier Piguet Ph.D.
NHMRC Fellow (Clinical Career Development Award)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer UNSW
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia
Voice: +61 2 9399 1113
Fax: +61 2 9399 1047
E-mail: o.pig...@powmri.edu.au

http://www.ftdrg.org/
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


[Freesurfer] pial edit on atrophied temporal pole

2009-05-14 Thread Olivier Piguet

Hi there,
I haven't received a reply to my question below.

Just to clarify, I ran autorecon1 and autorecon2 on this subject. When  
examining the surfaces in tkmedit, the left temporal pole is not  
included in the pial surface. Is there a way to force freesurfer to  
recognise this as valid brain tissue, bearing in mind that there is no  
visible white matter underneath (and therefore the option of adding  
control points is not possible).


Thanks for any suggestion to resolve this problem.

Olivier
On 13/05/2009, at 12:57, Olivier Piguet wrote:


Hi there,
I've run autorecon2 on a subject who has significant unilateral  
atrophy in the anterior temporal region. In the last few slices  
anteriorly, the pial surface does not include what is clearly  
atrophied cortical tissue without underlying white matter. What is  
the method to correct for this? Looking at previous queries, all of  
them refer to spots where one can manipulate the segmentation by  
adding control points in the neighbouring white matter, which is not  
present in this instance.

Any suggestion appreciated.
Olivier

~~~~~
Olivier Piguet Ph.D.
NHMRC Fellow (Clinical Career Development Award)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer UNSW
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia

Voice: +61 2 9399 1113
Fax: +61 2 9399 1047
E-mail: o.pig...@powmri.edu.au



http://www.ftdrg.org/


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

[Freesurfer] pial edit on atrophied temporal pole

2009-05-12 Thread Olivier Piguet

Hi there,
I've run autorecon2 on a subject who has significant unilateral  
atrophy in the anterior temporal region. In the last few slices  
anteriorly, the pial surface does not include what is clearly  
atrophied cortical tissue without underlying white matter. What is the  
method to correct for this? Looking at previous queries, all of them  
refer to spots where one can manipulate the segmentation by adding  
control points in the neighbouring white matter, which is not present  
in this instance.

Any suggestion appreciated.
Olivier

~
Olivier Piguet Ph.D.
NHMRC Fellow (Clinical Career Development Award)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer UNSW
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia

Voice: +61 2 9399 1113
Fax: +61 2 9399 1047
E-mail: o.pig...@powmri.edu.au



http://www.ftdrg.org/


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

[Freesurfer] unable to run mc-sess with bert dataset

2006-05-25 Thread Olivier Piguet
Title: Olivier Piguet, Ph






Good morning,

I recently installed the new version of FreeSurfer and have been
re-familiarising myself with the steps/procedures. I followed the
FreeSurfer and FsFast tutorial which went fine until I tried the step
described in the FsFastTutorial/700: Motion correct the data. When I
ran the command:

mc-sess -sf sessid -df sesspar

I received the following error message:


Logfile is
/home/olivierp/BERT_TUTORIAL_ANALYSES/log/mc-bert-functional-bold.log
---
/home/olivierp/FreeSurfer_tutorial/bert-functional
RunList: 007 008 009
Targ Stem is 007/f
  --- ** ---
  --- Motion Correcting Run 007 ---
  --- ** ---
sess = bert-functional
Fri May 26 08:27:34 EST 2006
mc-afni -i 007/f -o 007/fmc -t 007/f -toff 0 -ipr
3.1250 -bpr 6. 0007484366104649 -TR 2
ERROR: cannot find AFNI command to3d

Any help/suggestion on how to solve this problem would be greatly
appreciated.

Olivier Piguet


-- 











Olivier
Piguet,
Ph.D.
Prince
of Wales
Medical Research Institute
Barker
St
Randwick
NSW 2031
Australia
 




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] selxavg-sess: error message

2004-07-27 Thread Olivier Piguet
I tried the gammafit option but I am getting the same error message 
whether I specify a time window or not. Is there anything else that I 
should check?

The parafile contains 19 conditions + null. It is based on the 
subjects' responses (6 possible responses for 3 stimulus types = 18 
conditions; 1 missing response condition).

The TR is 2 s. Stimuli are presented every 4 s (2 s for fixation 
points). We have three retrieval runs. Each contains 146 items (37 
stimuli x 3 categories and 35 fixations).

Thanks
Olivier
At 11:28 AM -0400 7/21/04, Doug Greve wrote:
This means that the design matrix is ill-conditioned. This can happen if
your using an FIR model (ie, not using -gammafit) and the stimuli are
presented with some fixed timing with respect to each other with the
elapsed time between them being less than the FIR time window.  For
example, if you presented a stimulus every 16 sec but had a 20 sec time
window. Or if one stimulus is always followed by another with a fixed
delay. I suspect the latter is the case as it's hard to avoid with a
memory task. Unfortunately, you're pretty much forced to assume a shape
to the hemodynamic response (ie, use gammafit).
doug
Olivier Piguet wrote:
 Good morning,
 I am getting the following error message whilst trying to run the
 selxavg-sess command:
 ERROR: paradigm is ill-conditioned (5.37345e+18).
 Check your paradigm file for file for periodicities
 or for some event types that all ways follow other
 event types (or itself).
 >>  >> quiting matlab
 --
 ERROR: fast_selxavg() failed
 ERROR (/autofs/space/engram_010/users/rk_fmri_test/YNS15_060404):
 selxavg failed
 What is the meaning of this message? I have checked the mail archives
 but couldn't find any information.
 I am analysing data for a retrieval memory task and the para file
 (number of conditions and response types) is based on the subject
 responses and therefore some response types may or may not be
 repeating  themselves.
 Thanks
 Olivier
 --
 ---------
 Olivier Piguet, Ph.D.
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
 Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
 NE 20-392
 77 Massachusetts Avenue
 Cambridge MA 02139
 USA
 For overnight or express deliveries, send to:
 3 Cambridge Center
 Suite 392
 Cambridge, MA  02142
 USA
 Voice: (+ 1) 617-253-8976
 Fax: (+ 1) 617-253-1504
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

--
---------
Olivier Piguet, Ph.D.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
NE 20-392
77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge MA 02139
USA
For overnight or express deliveries, send to:
3 Cambridge Center
Suite 392
Cambridge, MA  02142
USA
Voice: (+ 1) 617-253-8976
Fax: (+ 1) 617-253-1504
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


[Freesurfer] selxavg-sess: error message

2004-07-21 Thread Olivier Piguet
Good morning,
I am getting the following error message whilst trying to run the 
selxavg-sess command:

ERROR: paradigm is ill-conditioned (5.37345e+18).
Check your paradigm file for file for periodicities
or for some event types that all ways follow other
event types (or itself).
 >> quiting matlab
--
ERROR: fast_selxavg() failed
ERROR (/autofs/space/engram_010/users/rk_fmri_test/YNS15_060404): 
selxavg failed

What is the meaning of this message? I have checked the mail archives 
but couldn't find any information.

I am analysing data for a retrieval memory task and the para file 
(number of conditions and response types) is based on the subject 
responses and therefore some response types may or may not be 
repeating  themselves.

Thanks
Olivier
--
---------
Olivier Piguet, Ph.D.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
NE 20-392
77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge MA 02139
USA
For overnight or express deliveries, send to:
3 Cambridge Center
Suite 392
Cambridge, MA  02142
USA
Voice: (+ 1) 617-253-8976
Fax: (+ 1) 617-253-1504
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer