Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-11-19 Thread Pradeep
Thank you for the response Doug!

The PET images I have are static images.  Six * 5 min frames which I have
summed together after realigning.

mri_gtmpvc --i summed.nii --psf 4 --auto-mask PSF+2 0.01 --seg gtmseg.mgz
--reg output.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx 0.01 --o gtmpvc.output

This command has worked and I just wanted to conform if it the correct way
to use it.

-Pradeep

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> wrote:

> For single frame, you can just run
> mri_convert input.nii output.nii --frame F
> where F is the 0-based frame number, then run mri_gtmpvc on output.nii
>
> The PVC "image" is a bit tricky. You can get a muller-gartner image
> (--mgx) or region-based voxel-wise (RBV) image with --rbv.
>
>
>
> On 11/18/2015 12:36 PM, Pradeep wrote:
> > Hello Doug,
> >
> > I am in the process of testing the FS PVC procedure and I was
> > wondering if there is a way to do this procedure with single frame PET
> > data and get the partial volume corrected SUVR image. I know that this
> > is still new and not all the processes is documented yet, but any
> > inputs on this would be appreciated. I have successfully ran steps 1
> > and 2 from the process you have outlines above.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pradeep
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jonathan DuBois
> > <jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I uploaded the files you requested. I'm not sure if it matters,
> > but one thing I forgot to mention was that in order to get the pet
> > file in the right format and orientation, I ended up using
> > (ecattominc pet.v pet.mnc) and (itk_convert --inv-y --inv-x
> > pet.mnc pet.nii). I couldn't find a good tool to convert directly
> > form ECAT to NIFTI, but perhaps this conversion process interferes
> > with the pet processing?
> >
> > Best,
> >     Jonathan
> >
> >     Message: 7
> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:07:18 -0400
> > From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Message-ID:
> > <5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> >
> > Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?
> > https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
> >
> >
> >
> > On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > > Hi Doug,
> > >
> > > I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this
> message.
> > > Thanks for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I
> > > ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected both and
> they
> > > look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at
> the
> > > auto mask step.
> > >
> > > I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it
> could be a
> > > memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac
> with
> > > 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got
> the same
> > > error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm.
> For the
> > > auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2.
> Is this
> > > correct?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
> --reg
> > > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> > > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > > Loading input pet.nii.gz
> > >   done loading input 26 frames
> > >
> > > $Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
> > > setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
> > > cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
> > > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-11-19 Thread Douglas Greve

yes, that is correct.

On 11/19/15 11:07 AM, Pradeep wrote:

Thank you for the response Doug!

The PET images I have are static images.  Six * 5 min frames which I 
have summed together after realigning.


mri_gtmpvc --i summed.nii --psf 4 --auto-mask PSF+2 0.01 --seg 
gtmseg.mgz --reg output.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx 0.01 --o 
gtmpvc.output


This command has worked and I just wanted to conform if it the correct 
way to use it.


-Pradeep

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Douglas N Greve 
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:


For single frame, you can just run
mri_convert input.nii output.nii --frame F
where F is the 0-based frame number, then run mri_gtmpvc on output.nii

The PVC "image" is a bit tricky. You can get a muller-gartner image
(--mgx) or region-based voxel-wise (RBV) image with --rbv.



On 11/18/2015 12:36 PM, Pradeep wrote:
> Hello Doug,
>
> I am in the process of testing the FS PVC procedure and I was
> wondering if there is a way to do this procedure with single
frame PET
> data and get the partial volume corrected SUVR image. I know
that this
> is still new and not all the processes is documented yet, but any
> inputs on this would be appreciated. I have successfully ran steps 1
> and 2 from the process you have outlines above.
>
> Thanks,
> Pradeep
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jonathan DuBois
> <jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com
<mailto:jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> I uploaded the files you requested. I'm not sure if it matters,
> but one thing I forgot to mention was that in order to get
the pet
> file in the right format and orientation, I ended up using
> (ecattominc pet.v pet.mnc) and (itk_convert --inv-y --inv-x
> pet.mnc pet.nii). I couldn't find a good tool to convert
directly
> form ECAT to NIFTI, but perhaps this conversion process
interferes
> with the pet processing?
>
> Best,
> Jonathan
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:07:18 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
    > <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>Message-ID:
> <5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> <mailto:5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252;
format=flowed
>
> Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?
> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>
>
>
> On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting
this message.
> > Thanks for sending me the information on the PET
scripts. I
> > ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected
both and they
> > look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with
mri_gtmpvc at the
> > auto mask step.
> >
> > I copied the command and the error below. I thought
that it could be a
> > memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it
on a mac with
> > 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce
and got the same
> > error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF
of 4mm. For the
> > auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions
were PSF+2. Is this
> > correct?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jonathan
> >
> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> >
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o
gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > Loading input pet.nii.gz
> >   done loading input 26 fra

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-11-18 Thread Pradeep
Hello Doug,

I am in the process of testing the FS PVC procedure and I was wondering if
there is a way to do this procedure with single frame PET data and get the
partial volume corrected SUVR image. I know that this is still new and not
all the processes is documented yet, but any inputs on this would be
appreciated. I have successfully ran steps 1 and 2 from the process you
have outlines above.

Thanks,
Pradeep

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jonathan DuBois <
jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Doug,
>
> I uploaded the files you requested. I'm not sure if it matters, but one
> thing I forgot to mention was that in order to get the pet file in the
> right format and orientation, I ended up using (ecattominc pet.v pet.mnc)
> and (itk_convert --inv-y --inv-x pet.mnc pet.nii). I couldn't find a good
> tool to convert directly form ECAT to NIFTI, but perhaps this conversion
> process interferes with the pet processing?
>
> Best,
> Jonathan
>
>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:07:18 -0400
>> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Message-ID: <5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?
>> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
>> > Hi Doug,
>> >
>> > I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this message.
>> > Thanks for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I
>> > ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected both and they
>> > look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the
>> > auto mask step.
>> >
>> > I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a
>> > memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with
>> > 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same
>> > error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the
>> > auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this
>> > correct?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Jonathan
>> >
>> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
>> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
>> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
>> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
>> > Loading input pet.nii.gz
>> >   done loading input 26 frames
>> >
>> > $Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
>> > setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
>> > cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
>> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
>> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
>> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
>> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
>> > sysname  Darwin
>> > hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
>> > machine  x86_64
>> > user jonathandubois
>> > vgthresh   0.001000
>> > nReplace   18
>> > 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
>> > 4 avail.processors, using 1
>> > Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
>> > Loading seg for gtm
>> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
>> > Loading seg ctab
>> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
>> > Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
>> > Replacing 18
>> > Pruning ctab
>> > done with seg vol
>> > maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
>> > Computing auto mask
>> > Segmentation fault: 11
>> >
>> >
>> > Message: 13
>> > Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
>> > From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> > <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
>> > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> > <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Message-ID:
>> > <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> > <mailto:55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>> > Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-11-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
For single frame, you can just run
mri_convert input.nii output.nii --frame F
where F is the 0-based frame number, then run mri_gtmpvc on output.nii

The PVC "image" is a bit tricky. You can get a muller-gartner image 
(--mgx) or region-based voxel-wise (RBV) image with --rbv.



On 11/18/2015 12:36 PM, Pradeep wrote:
> Hello Doug,
>
> I am in the process of testing the FS PVC procedure and I was 
> wondering if there is a way to do this procedure with single frame PET 
> data and get the partial volume corrected SUVR image. I know that this 
> is still new and not all the processes is documented yet, but any 
> inputs on this would be appreciated. I have successfully ran steps 1 
> and 2 from the process you have outlines above.
>
> Thanks,
> Pradeep
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jonathan DuBois 
> <jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com <mailto:jonathan.m.dub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> I uploaded the files you requested. I'm not sure if it matters,
> but one thing I forgot to mention was that in order to get the pet
> file in the right format and orientation, I ended up using
> (ecattominc pet.v pet.mnc) and (itk_convert --inv-y --inv-x
> pet.mnc pet.nii). I couldn't find a good tool to convert directly
> form ECAT to NIFTI, but perhaps this conversion process interferes
> with the pet processing?
>
> Best,
> Jonathan
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:07:18 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Message-ID:
> <5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?
> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>
>
>
> On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this message.
> > Thanks for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I
> > ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected both and they
> > look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the
> > auto mask step.
> >
> > I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could 
> be a
> > memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with
> > 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the 
> same
> > error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For 
> the
> > auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is 
> this
> > correct?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jonathan
> >
> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > Loading input pet.nii.gz
> >   done loading input 26 frames
> >
> > $Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
> > setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
> > cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > sysnameDarwin
> > hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
> > machinex86_64
> > user jonathandubois
> > vgthresh 0.001000
> > nReplace 18
> > 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
> > 4 avail.processors, using 1
> > Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
> > Loading seg for gtm
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
> > Loading seg ctab
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
> > Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
> > Replacing 18
> > Pruning ctab

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-28 Thread Jonathan DuBois
Hi Doug,

I uploaded the files you requested. I'm not sure if it matters, but one
thing I forgot to mention was that in order to get the pet file in the
right format and orientation, I ended up using (ecattominc pet.v pet.mnc)
and (itk_convert --inv-y --inv-x pet.mnc pet.nii). I couldn't find a good
tool to convert directly form ECAT to NIFTI, but perhaps this conversion
process interferes with the pet processing?

Best,
Jonathan


> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:07:18 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <5609ba16.2090...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?
> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>
>
>
> On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this message.
> > Thanks for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I
> > ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected both and they
> > look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the
> > auto mask step.
> >
> > I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a
> > memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with
> > 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same
> > error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the
> > auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this
> > correct?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jonathan
> >
> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > Loading input pet.nii.gz
> >   done loading input 26 frames
> >
> > $Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
> > setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
> > cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
> > mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
> > pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > sysname  Darwin
> > hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
> > machine  x86_64
> > user jonathandubois
> > vgthresh   0.001000
> > nReplace   18
> > 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
> > 4 avail.processors, using 1
> > Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
> > Loading seg for gtm
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
> > Loading seg ctab
> > /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
> > Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
> > Replacing 18
> > Pruning ctab
> > done with seg vol
> > maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
> > Computing auto mask
> > Segmentation fault: 11
> >
> >
> > Message: 13
> > Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
> > From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Message-ID:
> > <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> > Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They
> > are not
> > well documented yet.
> > 1. To start, run
> > gtmseg --s subject
> > This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed
> > for GTM
> > PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).
> > 2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister
> (with
> > --t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta). I
> > usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in parallel
> > with #1.
> > 3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like
> > mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg
> > gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o
> > gtmpvc.output
> > --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> > PSF is t

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-28 Thread Jonathan DuBois
Hi Doug,

I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this message. Thanks
for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I ran gtmseg, and
bbregister successfully (I inspected both and they look accurate), but I am
getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the auto mask step.

I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a
memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with 8gb) but
I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same error. The
data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the auto-mask input
I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this correct?

Thanks
Jonathan

mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
Loading input pet.nii.gz
  done loading input 26 frames

$Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
sysname  Darwin
hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
machine  x86_64
user jonathandubois
vgthresh   0.001000
nReplace   18
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 avail.processors, using 1
Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
Loading seg for gtm
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
Loading seg ctab /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
Replacing 18
Pruning ctab
done with seg vol
maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
Computing auto mask
Segmentation fault: 11


Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They are not
> well documented yet.
> 1. To start, run
> gtmseg --s subject
> This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed for GTM
> PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).
> 2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister (with
> --t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta). I
> usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in parallel with #1.
> 3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like
> mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg
> gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> PSF is the point-spread FWHM of the scanner; reg.lta is the registration
> from #2.  --km-hb specifies the highbinding region for MRTM2. --km-ref
> specifies the reference region.  --mgx specifies to output a
> muller-gartner map (not necessary for GTM ROI analysis).
> 4. For the GTM (ROI) MRTM1 KM analysis, you would then run
>   mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> where time.dat is a text file withe acquisition time of each time point
> in the tac.
> 5. For the MRTM2 analysis
> set k2p = `cat mrtm1/k2prime.dat`
> mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm2 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat $k2p --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> If you want to run a voxel-wise analysis, then you can use the mgx
> volume as input (--y). Probably you'll want to sample this to the
> surface using mri_vol2surf and the registration file aux/anat2pet.lta,
> then smooth on the surface.
>
>
> doug
>
>
>
> On 09/08/2015 02:11 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi FS experts,
> >
> > In FS development package I see that there have been tools added for
> > partial volume correction of PET data, but I was wondering if there
> > were also kinetic modeling tools similar to those described in Doug's
> > 2014 paper? If you could let me know what PET processing tools have
> > been included in the dev package, I would be interested to test and
> > compare them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/li

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-28 Thread Douglas N Greve
Can you upload the FS subject, pet data, and .lta?

https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2




On 09/28/2015 12:08 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I was told you were away last week so I'm reposting this message. 
> Thanks for sending me the information on the PET scripts. I 
> ran gtmseg, and bbregister successfully (I inspected both and they 
> look accurate), but I am getting a segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the 
> auto mask step.
>
> I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a 
> memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with 
> 8gb) but I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same 
> error. The data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the 
> auto-mask input I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this 
> correct?
>
> Thanks
> Jonathan
>
> mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg 
> /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg 
> pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output 
> --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> Loading input pet.nii.gz
>   done loading input 26 frames
>
> $Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
> cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
> mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg 
> /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg 
> pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output 
> --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> sysname  Darwin
> hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
> machine  x86_64
> user jonathandubois
> vgthresh   0.001000
> nReplace   18
> 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
> 4 avail.processors, using 1
> Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
> Loading seg for gtm 
> /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
> Loading seg ctab 
> /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
> Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
> Replacing 18
> Pruning ctab
> done with seg vol
> maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
> Computing auto mask
> Segmentation fault: 11
>
>
> Message: 13
>     Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
>     From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Message-ID:
> <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They
> are not
> well documented yet.
> 1. To start, run
> gtmseg --s subject
> This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed
> for GTM
> PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).
> 2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister (with
> --t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta). I
> usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in parallel
> with #1.
> 3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like
> mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg
> gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o
> gtmpvc.output
> --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> PSF is the point-spread FWHM of the scanner; reg.lta is the
> registration
> from #2.  --km-hb specifies the highbinding region for MRTM2. --km-ref
> specifies the reference region.  --mgx specifies to output a
> muller-gartner map (not necessary for GTM ROI analysis).
> 4. For the GTM (ROI) MRTM1 KM analysis, you would then run
>   mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> where time.dat is a text file withe acquisition time of each time
> point
> in the tac.
> 5. For the MRTM2 analysis
> set k2p = `cat mrtm1/k2prime.dat`
> mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm2 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat
> $k2p --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> If you want to run a voxel-wise analysis, then you can use the mgx
> volume as input (--y). Probably you'll want to sample this to the
> surface using mri_vol2surf and the registration file aux/anat2pet.lta,
> then smooth on the surface.
>
>
> doug
>
>
>
> On 09/08/2015 02:11 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi FS experts,
> >
> &

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-23 Thread Jonathan DuBois
Hi Doug,

Thanks for sending me this information. I ran gtmseg, and bbregister
successfully (I inspected both and they look accurate), but I am getting a s
egfault with mri_gtmpvc at the auto mask step.

I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a
memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with 8gb) but
I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same error. The
data is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the auto-mask input
I used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this correct?

Thanks
Jonathan

mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
Loading input pet.nii.gz
  done loading input 26 frames

$Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
sysname  Darwin
hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
machine  x86_64
user jonathandubois
vgthresh   0.001000
nReplace   18
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
4 avail.processors, using 1
Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
Loading seg for gtm
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
Loading seg ctab /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
Replacing 18
Pruning ctab
done with seg vol
maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
Computing auto mask
Segmentation fault: 11


Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They are not
> well documented yet.
> 1. To start, run
> gtmseg --s subject
> This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed for GTM
> PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).
> 2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister (with
> --t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta). I
> usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in parallel with #1.
> 3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like
> mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg
> gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output
> --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
> PSF is the point-spread FWHM of the scanner; reg.lta is the registration
> from #2.  --km-hb specifies the highbinding region for MRTM2. --km-ref
> specifies the reference region.  --mgx specifies to output a
> muller-gartner map (not necessary for GTM ROI analysis).
> 4. For the GTM (ROI) MRTM1 KM analysis, you would then run
>   mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> where time.dat is a text file withe acquisition time of each time point
> in the tac.
> 5. For the MRTM2 analysis
> set k2p = `cat mrtm1/k2prime.dat`
> mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm2 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat $k2p --o
> mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
> If you want to run a voxel-wise analysis, then you can use the mgx
> volume as input (--y). Probably you'll want to sample this to the
> surface using mri_vol2surf and the registration file aux/anat2pet.lta,
> then smooth on the surface.
>
>
> doug
>
>
>
> On 09/08/2015 02:11 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> > Hi FS experts,
> >
> > In FS development package I see that there have been tools added for
> > partial volume correction of PET data, but I was wondering if there
> > were also kinetic modeling tools similar to those described in Doug's
> > 2014 paper? If you could let me know what PET processing tools have
> > been included in the dev package, I would be interested to test and
> > compare them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: https://

Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-23 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Jonathan

just a warning that Doug is likely to be out of contact for a few days so 
please repost this type of question sometime next week.


cheers
Bruce

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Jonathan DuBois wrote:


Hi Doug, 

Thanks for sending me this information. I ran gtmseg, and bbregister
successfully (I inspected both and they look accurate), but I am getting a
segfault with mri_gtmpvc at the auto mask step. 

I copied the command and the error below. I thought that it could be a
memory issue due to the size of the matrix (I ran it on a mac with 8gb) but
I also tried to run it with the --tt-reduce and got the same error. The data
is from an HRRT PET scanner with a PSF of 4mm. For the auto-mask input I
used 6 .01, as your instructions were PSF+2. Is this correct? 

Thanks 
Jonathan

mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
Loading input pet.nii.gz
  done loading input 26 frames

$Id: mri_gtmpvc.c,v 1.57 2015/05/29 19:51:24 greve Exp $
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub
cd /Volumes/my_passport/external/Documents/fssub2/test
mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --psf 4 --auto-mask 6 .01 --seg
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz --reg
pet_avt_reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output --km-hb 11
12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale 
sysname  Darwin
hostname Jons-MacBook-Air.local
machine  x86_64
user     jonathandubois
vgthresh   0.001000
nReplace   18
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 
4 avail.processors, using 1
Creating output directory gtmpvc.output
Loading seg for gtm
/Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.mgz
Loading seg ctab /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.ctab
Reading /Users/jonathandubois/data/fssub/epc_02/mri/gtmseg.lta
Replacing 18
Pruning ctab
done with seg vol
maxFWHM = 3.28205 (voxels), PadThresh=0.0001, nPad=10
Computing auto mask 
Segmentation fault: 11


  Message: 13
  Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:34:11 -0400
  From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
  Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0
  To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Message-ID: <55ef2a23.3070...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
  Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They
  are not
  well documented yet.
  1. To start, run
  gtmseg --s subject
  This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed
  for GTM
  PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).
  2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister
  (with
  --t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta).
  I
  usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in
  parallel with #1.
  3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like
  mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg
  gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o
  gtmpvc.output
  --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale
  PSF is the point-spread FWHM of the scanner; reg.lta is the
  registration
  from #2.  --km-hb specifies the highbinding region for MRTM2.
  --km-ref
  specifies the reference region.  --mgx specifies to output a
  muller-gartner map (not necessary for GTM ROI analysis).
  4. For the GTM (ROI) MRTM1 KM analysis, you would then run
    mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 km.ref.tac.dat
  time.dat --o
  mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
  where time.dat is a text file withe acquisition time of each
  time point
  in the tac.
  5. For the MRTM2 analysis
  set k2p = `cat mrtm1/k2prime.dat`
  mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm2 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat
  $k2p --o
  mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz
  If you want to run a voxel-wise analysis, then you can use the
  mgx
  volume as input (--y). Probably you'll want to sample this to
  the
  surface using mri_vol2surf and the registration file
  aux/anat2pet.lta,
  then smooth on the surface.


  doug



  On 09/08/2015 02:11 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
  > Hi FS experts,
  >
  > In FS development package I see that there have been tools
  added for
  > partial volume correction of PET data, but I was wondering if
  there
  > were also kinetic modeling tools similar to those described in
  Doug's
  > 2014 paper? If you could let me know what PET processing tools
  have
  > been included in the dev package, I would be interested to
  test and
  > compare them.
  >
  > Thanks,
  > Jonathan
  >
  >
  > 

[Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-08 Thread Jonathan DuBois
Hi FS experts,

In FS development package I see that there have been tools added for
partial volume correction of PET data, but I was wondering if there were
also kinetic modeling tools similar to those described in Doug's 2014
paper? If you could let me know what PET processing tools have been
included in the dev package, I would be interested to test and compare
them.

Thanks,
Jonathan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] PET tools in FS dev v6.0

2015-09-08 Thread Douglas N Greve
Yes there are both. For KM we have MRTM1 and MRTM2 so far. They are not 
well documented yet.

1. To start, run

gtmseg --s subject

This will take a couple of hours and produces some files needed for GTM 
PVC (which is used for GTM, MG, RBV).

2. You'd then register the PET to the anatomical with bbregister (with 
--t2 weighting). Make sure to save the output as an LTA (--lta). I 
usually use the mean TAC as the input. You can do this in parallel with #1.

3. You'd then run mri_gtmpvc, something like

mri_gtmpvc --i tac.nii.gz --psf PSF  --auto-mask PSF+2 .01 --seg 
gtmseg.mgz --reg reg.lta --default-seg-merge --mgx .01 --o gtmpvc.output 
--km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --km-ref 8 47 --no-rescale

PSF is the point-spread FWHM of the scanner; reg.lta is the registration 
from #2.  --km-hb specifies the highbinding region for MRTM2. --km-ref 
specifies the reference region.  --mgx specifies to output a 
muller-gartner map (not necessary for GTM ROI analysis).

4. For the GTM (ROI) MRTM1 KM analysis, you would then run

  mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm1 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat --o 
mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz

where time.dat is a text file withe acquisition time of each time point 
in the tac.

5. For the MRTM2 analysis

set k2p = `cat mrtm1/k2prime.dat`
mri_glmfit --y km.hb.tac.nii.gz --mrtm2 km.ref.tac.dat time.dat $k2p --o 
mrtm1 --no-est-fwhm --nii.gz

If you want to run a voxel-wise analysis, then you can use the mgx 
volume as input (--y). Probably you'll want to sample this to the 
surface using mri_vol2surf and the registration file aux/anat2pet.lta, 
then smooth on the surface.



doug




On 09/08/2015 02:11 PM, Jonathan DuBois wrote:
> Hi FS experts,
>
> In FS development package I see that there have been tools added for 
> partial volume correction of PET data, but I was wondering if there 
> were also kinetic modeling tools similar to those described in Doug's 
> 2014 paper? If you could let me know what PET processing tools have 
> been included in the dev package, I would be interested to test and 
> compare them.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.