They both give the same results for the same analysis. It is harder to
do proper correction for multiple comparisons in QDEC
On 4/20/18 12:50 PM, Arsenije Subotic wrote:
Dear experts,
I'm about to start my cortical thickness analysis for my groups, and I
was just wondering what seems to be the consensus when it comes to
using QDEC as opposed to using the command line stream? I've seen QDEC
used plentifully in the literature, but I am also aware that it has
less glm capability.
Thank you for any input!
Arsenije
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
