[Freesurfer] Structural group analysis
Dear FreeSurfer team, I'm doing a structural analysis with around 20 subjects and I'm specifically interested in the areas premotor cortex and primary motor cortex. By matlab analysis I've found a very strong statistical significant difference in the cortical thickness when comparing these two areas with all subjects (data extracted from FreeSurfer recon-all pipeline). I would like to visualize these results on the surface of fsaverage, and I'm familiar with the FreeSurfer group analysis pipeline. So far I've simply made a OSGM group analysis and visualized these results on the fsaverage in a premade label of premotor cortex and primary motor cortex and correlated for multiple comparisons using your precomputed monte carlo simulation - but this doesn't make it. Do you guys have a clever way to visualize these results in FreeSurfer? I have one group and would like to visualize the difference between two areas. I've thought about presenting each subject two times in the FSGD-file (primary motor cortex and premotor cortex), but this isn't possible and seems as a clumsy way to solve this problem. Please let me know if my problem is incomprehensible! Best, Silas ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Structural group analysis
Not sure what you are trying to do. Are you comparing the average thickness in premotor to that in primary motor? What would it mean to visualize that? On 08/22/2016 09:52 AM, Silas wrote: > > Dear FreeSurfer team, > > > I'm doing a structural analysis with around 20 subjects and I'm > specifically interested in the areas premotor cortex and primary motor > cortex. By matlab analysis I've found a very strong statistical > significant difference in the cortical thickness when comparing these > two areas with all subjects (data extracted from FreeSurfer recon-all > pipeline). I would like to visualize these results on the surface of > fsaverage, and I'm familiar with the FreeSurfer group analysis > pipeline. So far I've simply made a OSGM group analysis and visualized > these results on the fsaverage in a premade label of premotor cortex > and primary motor cortex and correlated for multiple comparisons using > your precomputed monte carlo simulation - but this doesn't make it. > > > Do you guys have a clever way to visualize these results in > FreeSurfer? I have one group and would like to visualize the > difference between two areas. I've thought about presenting each > subject two times in the FSGD-file (primary motor cortex and premotor > cortex), but this isn't possible and seems as a clumsy way to solve > this problem. > > > Please let me know if my problem is incomprehensible! > > > Best, Silas > > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] Structural Group Analysis vs. DTI Group Analysis
Dear all, I completed my DTI group analysis at subcortical level on the CVS space and found clusters that survived by multiple comparisons. The results shows that FA is decreasing in patients vs. controls. I used then the same subject to do a structural group analysis to compare the cortical thickness between the two classes. I found some clusters on the fsaverage but this time they different located then the clusters found in my DTI data. Is this right? I suppose it should be since I compare two different data sets for the same subjects: FA clusters on subcortical CVS space vs. structural data on the fsaverage. I still found that my cortical thickness is decreasing in patients vs. controls but is there any relation that I can established between the two studies? Can I merge my structural results with my subcortical results? I was reading about this on your webpage:http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastTutorialV5.1/FsFastGroupLevel but I am not sure if in this case the structural analysis is using the same functional data set while in my case I have same subjects but structural data for the structural group analysis and DTI data for the subcortical analysis. Can you please make this a little clear for me? Thank you very much! Antonella ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] Structural Group Analysis vs. DTI Group Analysis
Dear all, I completed my DTI group analysis at subcortical level on the CVS space and found clusters that survived by multiple comparisons. The results shows that FA is decreasing in patients vs. controls. I used then the same subject to do a structural group analysis to compare the cortical thickness between the two classes. I found some clusters on the fsaverage but this time they different located then the clusters found in my DTI data. Is this right? I suppose it should be since I compare two different data sets for the same subjects: FA clusters on subcortical CVS space vs. structural data on the fsaverage. I still found that my cortical thickness is decreasing in patients vs. controls but is there any relation that I can established between the two studies? Can I merge my structural results with my subcortical results? I was reading about this on your webpage:http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastTutorialV5.1/FsFastGroupLevel but I am not sure if in this case the structural analysis is using the same functional data set while in my case I have same subjects but structural data for the structural group analysis and DTI data for the subcortical analysis. Can you please make this a little clear for me? Thank you very much! Antonella___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
