Re: [Freesurfer] aparc+aseg.mgz and aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz

2011-03-06 Thread Nick Schmansky
Hi,

1) what means are you using to find the values?  when i use:

mri_binarize --i aparc+aseg.mgz  --min 14176 --o aparc+aseg+14176.mgz

it doesnt find any voxels above 14176 in either file.

2) the FreeSurferColorLUT.txt contains labels for many different
labeling projects done at the center, so only a subset of these make it
into the default vols created by recon-all.

n.



On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:53 -0300, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira
Junior wrote:
> I was checking the values at both aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz and aparc
> +aseg.mgz and comparing it with the labels in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
> 
> 
> I have noticed some problems:
> 1) There are values out of the range specified
> in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt (in bert dataset there are 353528 voxels
> with values above 14999)
> 2) There are many areas in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt that don't appear
> neither in aparc+aseg nor in aparc.a2009s+aseg 
> 
> 
> My main concern is with the out of range values, which structure they
> map to?
> 
> 
> thanks
> -
> Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
> Diretor de Operações
> Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
> -- www.netfilter.com.br
> -- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] aparc+aseg.mgz and aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz

2011-03-06 Thread Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
I was checking the values at both aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz and aparc+aseg.mgz
and comparing it with the labels in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt

I have noticed some problems:
1) There are values out of the range specified in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt (in
bert dataset there are 353528 voxels with values above 14999)
2) There are many areas in FreeSurferColorLUT.txt that don't appear neither
in aparc+aseg nor in aparc.a2009s+aseg

My main concern is with the out of range values, which structure they map
to?

thanks
-
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
Diretor de Operações
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
-- www.netfilter.com.br
-- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.