If there is no interaction between F/R and Active, then there should not be any 
theoretical difference between the two analyses, except that FR combined will 
be slightly more powerful since it has one more degree of freedom. You should 
first use the uncombined model to look for an interaction, and then proceed 
with the combined if there is no significant interaction.

There are several other things that could also come into play. First, it looks 
like the Rs have a much higher active score than Fs. This will create some 
correlation in the uncombined model and weaken the power. Second, it looks like 
there might be more Sex=1 in the R group; this will also weaken the uncombined 
model.

One more thing: you are not modeling sex properly. You should create four 
Classes (F-Male, F-Female, R-Male, and R-Female)


On 8/19/2019 8:32 AM, tange_neuro wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution
Hi all,
I am deeply confused and terribly needed some help, and I failed to find the 
answer in the Freesurfer website.
I had two patient groups F and R. To analysis the correlation between active 
time and cortical thickness, I tried two different methods A and B (A, treating 
patients in different group F and R as shown in attached figure A; B, treating 
all patients as one group FR as shown in attached figure B), and got distinctly 
different results.
So, my questions:
1、Which one is actually correct for calculating the correlation between active 
time and thickness, and what does the other one mean?
2、Does "--cache 3 abs --cwp 0.999" means that the result is only corrected with 
vertex level P < 0.001, and no cluster level correction is conducted?
I am looking forward to getting your help.
Sincerely yours,
Ge Tan







_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to