Re: [Freesurfer] problem with surface area regression

2013-06-25 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Wen,

Brain volume has a good relationship with the overall surface area measured
in native space (so, irrespective to any kind of interpolation). We found
an R^2 of 0.856, which is higher even than the correlation of brain volume
with gray matter volume as measured via VBM-like methods.

However, even if the relationship between these measurements were poor,
include brain volume as a covariate hardly hurts the model, unless you have
only few degrees of freedom (say, a tiny number of subjects).

Another thing, and perhaps better, is to consider using global surface area
instead of brain volume as a covariate for a study of surface area, to
remove global and focus only on local effects.

All the best,

Anderson



2013/6/24 wen.zhang55 

> Dear Freesurfer,
>
> I have checked the mail list, none could answer my problem.
> I added up the value of all vertxes in the .area or .area.pial files, find
> that brain size did not contribute much to that vertex-sum. However, some
> experiment used total brain volume as a regreesion coefficient to remove
> brain size effect. In these case, with the comparison of surface area in
> vertex-to-vertex, is it proper to use the above vertex-sum as the
> regression coefficient to remove different brain size?
> Thank you very much!
>
> Cowen
>
> 2013-06-24
>
>
>
> wen.zhang55
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] problem with surface area regression

2013-06-24 Thread wen.zhang55
Dear Freesurfer,   
   
I have checked the mail list, none could answer my problem.   
I added up the value of all vertxes in the .area or .area.pial files, find that 
brain size did not contribute much to that vertex-sum. However, some experiment 
used total brain volume as a regreesion coefficient to remove brain size 
effect. In these case, with the comparison of surface area in vertex-to-vertex, 
is it proper to use the above vertex-sum as the regression coefficient to 
remove different brain size?
Thank you very much!   
   
Cowen   
   
2013-06-24   
   
   
   
wen.zhang55   

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.