Re: [Freesurfer] wm parcellation freesurfer

2015-08-06 Thread Owais Syed
That was it! (and yes, we were trying to have freesurfer do an
autoparcellation for higher resolution MRI, but the full reconstruction
unfortunately keeps failing on processes like skull strip). But for now, we
will use the 1 mm reconstruction. Thank you for the help!

Owais

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Bruce Fischl 
wrote:

> Hi Owais
>
> are your voxels really .36mm isotropic? That is extremely high resolution
> and very very rare (and hard!) if you are getting whole-brain coverage. You
> can use -cm in recon-all (conform to min) to keep the resolution, but
> everything will take way longer and use way more memory. I would check to
> see what the true resolution of your data is first though.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Owais Syed wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply, I think I misspoke though. My original T1 MRI has a
>> voxel size of <0.36, 0.36, 0.36>. But when I am looking through the files
>> created via recon -all (specifically wmparc.mgz, although present in other
>> files as well), I noticed that the voxel size is a bit larger (about <1,
>> 1,
>> 1>).
>> Is there a way to edit the voxel size to match the MRI during recon -all?
>>
>> Also how would I do that specifically for just creating wmparc.mgz from
>> the
>> original T1 MRI? If it is possible to do so that would be nice, otherwise
>> I
>> will probably try to run the entire recon -all with the new voxel size.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Owais
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Fischl <
>> fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> wrote:
>>   Hi Owais
>>
>>   do you mean the wmparc.mgz or the aparc+aseg.mgz? You can use
>>   mris_divide_parcellation or mris_make_face_parcellation to
>>   subdivide or
>>   make an isotropic finer scale one if you want. I believe that
>>   you can then
>>   create a new aparc+aseg from one of those and then the wmparc
>>   from that to
>>   get a finer one
>>   cheers
>>   Bruce
>>
>>
>>   On Tue, 28 Jul 2015,
>>   Owais Syed wrote:
>>
>>   > Hi,
>>   > Is it possible to increase the number of parcellations when
>>   making the aparc+aseg
>>   > file? I have a high resolution MRI, and one parcellation will
>>   match every three
>>   > slides, but I want a better match overall.
>>   >
>>   > Thanks,
>>   >
>>   > Owais
>>   >
>>   >
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>> it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
>> and properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Owais Syed
>> Chemistry, Psychology
>> Rice University Class of 2016
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>


-- 
Owais Syed
Chemistry, Psychology
Rice University Class of 2016
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] wm parcellation freesurfer

2015-08-03 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Owais

are your voxels really .36mm isotropic? That is extremely high resolution 
and very very rare (and hard!) if you are getting whole-brain coverage. You 
can use -cm in recon-all (conform to min) to keep the resolution, but 
everything will take way longer and use way more memory. I would check to 
see what the true resolution of your data is first though.


cheers
Bruce


On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Owais Syed 
wrote:



Thanks for the reply, I think I misspoke though. My original T1 MRI has a
voxel size of <0.36, 0.36, 0.36>. But when I am looking through the files
created via recon -all (specifically wmparc.mgz, although present in other
files as well), I noticed that the voxel size is a bit larger (about <1, 1,
1>). 
Is there a way to edit the voxel size to match the MRI during recon -all? 

Also how would I do that specifically for just creating wmparc.mgz from the
original T1 MRI? If it is possible to do so that would be nice, otherwise I
will probably try to run the entire recon -all with the new voxel size.

Thanks,
Owais  

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Fischl 
wrote:
  Hi Owais

  do you mean the wmparc.mgz or the aparc+aseg.mgz? You can use
  mris_divide_parcellation or mris_make_face_parcellation to
  subdivide or
  make an isotropic finer scale one if you want. I believe that
  you can then
  create a new aparc+aseg from one of those and then the wmparc
  from that to
  get a finer one
  cheers
  Bruce


  On Tue, 28 Jul 2015,
  Owais Syed wrote:

  > Hi,
  > Is it possible to increase the number of parcellations when
  making the aparc+aseg
  > file? I have a high resolution MRI, and one parcellation will
  match every three
  > slides, but I want a better match overall.
  >
  > Thanks,
  >
  > Owais
  >
  >
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Owais Syed
Chemistry, Psychology
Rice University Class of 2016

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] wm parcellation freesurfer

2015-08-03 Thread Owais Syed
Thanks for the reply, I think I misspoke though. My original T1 MRI has a
voxel size of <0.36, 0.36, 0.36>. But when I am looking through the files
created via recon -all (specifically wmparc.mgz, although present in other
files as well), I noticed that the voxel size is a bit larger (about <1, 1,
1>).

Is there a way to edit the voxel size to match the MRI during recon -all?

Also how would I do that specifically for just creating wmparc.mgz from the
original T1 MRI? If it is possible to do so that would be nice, otherwise I
will probably try to run the entire recon -all with the new voxel size.

Thanks,
Owais

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Fischl 
wrote:

> Hi Owais
>
> do you mean the wmparc.mgz or the aparc+aseg.mgz? You can use
> mris_divide_parcellation or mris_make_face_parcellation to subdivide or
> make an isotropic finer scale one if you want. I believe that you can then
> create a new aparc+aseg from one of those and then the wmparc from that to
> get a finer one
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2015,
> Owais Syed wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Is it possible to increase the number of parcellations when making the
> aparc+aseg
> > file? I have a high resolution MRI, and one parcellation will match
> every three
> > slides, but I want a better match overall.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Owais
> >
> >
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>


-- 
Owais Syed
Chemistry, Psychology
Rice University Class of 2016
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] wm parcellation freesurfer

2015-07-29 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Owais

do you mean the wmparc.mgz or the aparc+aseg.mgz? You can use 
mris_divide_parcellation or mris_make_face_parcellation to subdivide or 
make an isotropic finer scale one if you want. I believe that you can then 
create a new aparc+aseg from one of those and then the wmparc from that to 
get a finer one
cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, 
Owais Syed wrote:

> Hi,
> Is it possible to increase the number of parcellations when making the 
> aparc+aseg
> file? I have a high resolution MRI, and one parcellation will match every 
> three
> slides, but I want a better match overall.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Owais
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] wm parcellation freesurfer

2015-07-28 Thread Owais Syed
Hi,

Is it possible to increase the number of parcellations when making the
aparc+aseg file? I have a high resolution MRI, and one parcellation will
match every three slides, but I want a better match overall.

Thanks,

Owais
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.