Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
SubCortGrayVol on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the same patient.Does the processing time have something to with the results,it varies a lot. On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Chikku, Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly. Nick On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
oh, that's way too big a difference. Something is wrong On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote: SubCortGrayVol on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the same patient.Does the processing time have something to with the results,it varies a lot. On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Chikku, Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly. Nick On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 bit. cheers Bruce On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All,I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
Hi Chikku note that because you have a 64 bit mac doesn't mean you are running 64 bit software. Until pretty recently we didn't have a 64 bit mac version, so unless you downloaded a beta in the last month or so, you are likely running a 32 bit version cheers Bruce On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote: Thanks Bruce,Its 64 bit. On 29 January 2013 15:12, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 bit. cheers Bruce On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All,I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
Chikku, Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly. Nick On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Delay
Thanks Nick, Please find the attached. On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Chikku, Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly. Nick On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. recon-all-status.log Description: Binary data ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
