[Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
hi, we are fighting with two flaws in fs and would be happy, if they could be fixed. we are using socket outbound. 1.) hangup a call in ringing state: this worked in one of the last fs versions, but suddenly does not work anymore. let's say, we have an inbound call and do 3 originates to different targets. all 3 targets are in ringing state. the target, which answers first, will be bridged with the inbound call, the other two (still ringing) targets should be hung up. we do not want fs to hang up the other two originates automatically. we want to hang up the other two originates by sending the hangups. we set hangup_after_bridge=false and park_after_bridge=true. we do sendmsg hangup uuid. but the originates are first hung up, when they are answered. when they are in ringing state, the hangup will do nothing (anymore). as i said, it worked before, so i assume, that something has changed in the latest trunks. 2.) sendmsg uuid *whatever* can cause to excute the command on the wrong uuid: let's say, we have an inbound call and an outbound call - at least we thing we have it ;-). now we do for example sendmsg outbound_uuid hangup to hangup the outbound call. but, if the uuid of the outbound call does not exist (because there was a problem or something), the inbound will be hung up instead. the same happens with all sent messages to an uuid, which does not exist. if we want to do a playback for the same outbound, the inbound will hear it, if the outbound_uuid does not exist. perhaps this is a feature, but i think that it would be nicer and more reliable, if the sendmsg is only executed on the given uuid. if the given uuid does not exist, nothing should happen or even nicer, an event with an error should be sent to the socket. thanks dennis ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
hi, we are using socket outbound and found out, that there are two (perhaps) small things, we would like to see in fs. 1.) if we try to playback a soundfile, which does not exist, we do not get an error or something. in the cli of fs we can see the error, but we do not get anything about it over the socket. we get an execute event for the playback and directly after it an execute-complete. wouldn't it be nicer, if one could get a notice about an error, like: execute-complete-error or a variable, which is set with an error, if an error occours? 2.) the session heartbeat event is an absolutely great feature in fs. but sometimes we would like to get the session heartbeat every 5 seconds. at the moment the allowed minimum is every 10 seconds. a smaller setting, like every 5 seconds, will result in a session heartbeat of every 60 seconds. to help us out, we edit the switch_core_session.c at line 899 and change the seconds 10 to seconds 5. because one has to set enable_heartbeat_events=5 manually, i do not think, that there is a risk, that others, who do not want the heartbeat to come that often, will be negatively affected by this change. might it be possible, to do the same changes to the default code? thanks dennis ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Read app ignores custom variable when called via socket interface
OK my bad. The variable is set (I can see it in the Freeswitch console
when I use the info app), but they are only not send to me via the
socket interface. I get the variable_* variables only in the
beginning (after calling connect), but not in the events. How do I
enable this?
Thanks,
Jan
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Anthony Minessale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems unlikely.
You sure about that?
The var param is in the middle of the data which is passed as 1 giant string
to the same exact app execution code.
I don't see how it could differentiate
did you try executing the info app right after to see all the vars.
I'm not saying i don't believe you but it seems fishy.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Jan Kubr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I checked out the current trunk (rev 10641) and found out that the
read app ignores the varname parameter, it always puts the result in
the DTMF-Digit variable. I'm calling it via the socket interface:
sendmsg
call-command: execute
execute-app-name: read
execute-app-arg: 1 1 en/us/callie/conference/8000/conf-pin.wav res 1 #
event-lock:true
In the XML dialplan it works fine:
action application=read data=1 1
sounds/en/us/callie/conference/8000/conf-pin.wav res 1 #/
action application=phrase data=spell,${res}/
I have been using the socket call above successfully in the 1.0.1 release.
Any ideas? Thanks,
Jan Kubr
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] conference configured to call automatically the attended does not work
I have found my mistake. In the dialplan I have written action application=conference_set_auto_outcall data=sofia/internal/.../ instead of action application=conference_set_auto_outcall data=user/.../ Sorry for the post, Carole Carole O. wrote: Hello, I have got some problems for the configuration of a simple conference which should be established by calling an extension and automatically inviting 2 people. Actually, this is based on the default configuration of Freeswitch (extension 0911). I have changed it a little: extension name=conference_test condition field=destination_number expression=^0911$ !-- These parameters effect the outcalls made once you join -- action application=set data=conference_auto_outcall_caller_id_name=telephoneX / action application=set data=conference_auto_outcall_id_number=0911 / action application=set data=conference_auto_outcall_timeout=60 / action application=set data=conference_auto_outcall_flags=none / !-- list of devices called -- action application=conference_set_auto_outcall data=sofia/internal/[EMAIL PROTECTED] / action application=conference_set_auto_outcall data=sofia/internal/[EMAIL PROTECTED] / action application=conference data=[EMAIL PROTECTED] / /condition /extension I have attached a file with the console errors. There are some errors (moh errors) but since these were also present for room conference and it did not prevent it for working, I guess this is not the fundamental reason for the previous problem. I have an additional question. I have installed freeswitch from opensuse.org, there is a simple one-click installation but I am not sure this was a good idea, it seems to be light isn't? Thanks for your help, Carole http://www.nabble.com/file/p20856465/error_console.txt error_console.txt -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/conference-configured-to-call-automatically-the-attended-does-not-work-tp20856465p20895038.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
Can you please file bugs on http://jira.freeswitch.org with full sip trace and FreeSWITCH debug output of these cases. On Dec 8, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Dennis wrote: hi, we are fighting with two flaws in fs and would be happy, if they could be fixed. we are using socket outbound. 1.) hangup a call in ringing state: this worked in one of the last fs versions, but suddenly does not work anymore. let's say, we have an inbound call and do 3 originates to different targets. all 3 targets are in ringing state. the target, which answers first, will be bridged with the inbound call, the other two (still ringing) targets should be hung up. we do not want fs to hang up the other two originates automatically. we want to hang up the other two originates by sending the hangups. we set hangup_after_bridge=false and park_after_bridge=true. we do sendmsg hangup uuid. but the originates are first hung up, when they are answered. when they are in ringing state, the hangup will do nothing (anymore). as i said, it worked before, so i assume, that something has changed in the latest trunks. 2.) sendmsg uuid *whatever* can cause to excute the command on the wrong uuid: let's say, we have an inbound call and an outbound call - at least we thing we have it ;-). now we do for example sendmsg outbound_uuid hangup to hangup the outbound call. but, if the uuid of the outbound call does not exist (because there was a problem or something), the inbound will be hung up instead. the same happens with all sent messages to an uuid, which does not exist. if we want to do a playback for the same outbound, the inbound will hear it, if the outbound_uuid does not exist. perhaps this is a feature, but i think that it would be nicer and more reliable, if the sendmsg is only executed on the given uuid. if the given uuid does not exist, nothing should happen or even nicer, an event with an error should be sent to the socket. thanks dennis ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
On Dec 8, 2008, at 4:47 AM, Dennis wrote: at the moment the allowed minimum is every 10 seconds. a smaller setting, like every 5 seconds, will result in a session heartbeat of every 60 seconds. Huh? ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Proto specific hangup cause issue
sip_hangup_disposition will be set to recv_bye on the side that was hungup. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Any updates about the which side hanged up potential variable? Michael S Collins wrote: Makes sense. I will look into this. -MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sending this second email to request/suggest/enquire about something relevant : Wouldn't it be useful to know which end of a specific call leg send the protocol specific hangup cause? Otherwise it would be difficult to understand what really happened. Michael S Collins wrote: I will do some research on this and let you know what I find out. Question: are these internal calls or pstn or ?? Just curious about your environment. Thanks, MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The proto_specific_hangup_cause is missing on one of the two call legs. When the caller hangs up it is missing from the a-leg CDR. When the callee hangs up it is missing from the b-leg CDR. Is this nornal? And another question : what piece of info could inform me about who hanged up? -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Proto specific hangup cause issue
Any updates about the which side hanged up potential variable? Michael S Collins wrote: Makes sense. I will look into this. -MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sending this second email to request/suggest/enquire about something relevant : Wouldn't it be useful to know which end of a specific call leg send the protocol specific hangup cause? Otherwise it would be difficult to understand what really happened. Michael S Collins wrote: I will do some research on this and let you know what I find out. Question: are these internal calls or pstn or ?? Just curious about your environment. Thanks, MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The proto_specific_hangup_cause is missing on one of the two call legs. When the caller hangs up it is missing from the a-leg CDR. When the callee hangs up it is missing from the b-leg CDR. Is this nornal? And another question : what piece of info could inform me about who hanged up? -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
#2 was because when you sendmsg with no uuid on an outbound socket it defaults to the session who called you. I changed to code to make a distinction between not supplying a uuid and supplying an invalid uuid. #1 seems hard to believe. Please provide a console trace of the channel *ignoring* the hangup command. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, we are fighting with two flaws in fs and would be happy, if they could be fixed. we are using socket outbound. 1.) hangup a call in ringing state: this worked in one of the last fs versions, but suddenly does not work anymore. let's say, we have an inbound call and do 3 originates to different targets. all 3 targets are in ringing state. the target, which answers first, will be bridged with the inbound call, the other two (still ringing) targets should be hung up. we do not want fs to hang up the other two originates automatically. we want to hang up the other two originates by sending the hangups. we set hangup_after_bridge=false and park_after_bridge=true. we do sendmsg hangup uuid. but the originates are first hung up, when they are answered. when they are in ringing state, the hangup will do nothing (anymore). as i said, it worked before, so i assume, that something has changed in the latest trunks. 2.) sendmsg uuid *whatever* can cause to excute the command on the wrong uuid: let's say, we have an inbound call and an outbound call - at least we thing we have it ;-). now we do for example sendmsg outbound_uuid hangup to hangup the outbound call. but, if the uuid of the outbound call does not exist (because there was a problem or something), the inbound will be hung up instead. the same happens with all sent messages to an uuid, which does not exist. if we want to do a playback for the same outbound, the inbound will hear it, if the outbound_uuid does not exist. perhaps this is a feature, but i think that it would be nicer and more reliable, if the sendmsg is only executed on the given uuid. if the given uuid does not exist, nothing should happen or even nicer, an event with an error should be sent to the socket. thanks dennis ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Proto specific hangup cause issue
Not necessarily. For instance I got a send_cancel when the calling party hanged up before the other party could pick up. Also, shouldn't something like that be protocol/technology neutral? Anthony Minessale wrote: sip_hangup_disposition will be set to recv_bye on the side that was hungup. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any updates about the which side hanged up potential variable? Michael S Collins wrote: Makes sense. I will look into this. -MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sending this second email to request/suggest/enquire about something relevant : Wouldn't it be useful to know which end of a specific call leg send the protocol specific hangup cause? Otherwise it would be difficult to understand what really happened. Michael S Collins wrote: I will do some research on this and let you know what I find out. Question: are these internal calls or pstn or ?? Just curious about your environment. Thanks, MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The proto_specific_hangup_cause is missing on one of the two call legs. When the caller hangs up it is missing from the a-leg CDR. When the callee hangs up it is missing from the b-leg CDR. Is this nornal? And another question : what piece of info could inform me about who hanged up? -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net http://irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 http://iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org --
Re: [Freeswitch-users] rootkit?
A few files which you can choose to install to let the Freeswitch developers access your machine remotely if you ask them to look at a problem you're having with Freeswitch. It's not a real rootkit - just the SSH public key for their private key (so they don't need a password) and configuration files for bash + emacs (so they're working in the environment they're used to). It doesn't burrow into your OS, hide itself or any of the other insidious things a real rootkit does, and once you delete the files they can no longer access your machine. It isn't installed unless you choose to do so. -Steve 2008/12/7 Martin Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What is the rootkit item that appears to be added to the SVN of trunk? Thanks, Marty ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
Huh?
src/switch_core_session.c vom line 899 to 901:
if (seconds 10) {
seconds = 60;
}
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
done
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh?
src/switch_core_session.c vom line 899 to 901:
if (seconds 10) {
seconds = 60;
}
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
both done
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Anthony Minessale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
done
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh?
src/switch_core_session.c vom line 899 to 901:
if (seconds 10) {
seconds = 60;
}
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
#2 was because when you sendmsg with no uuid on an outbound socket it defaults to the session who called you. I changed to code to make a distinction between not supplying a uuid and supplying an invalid uuid. anthony, thanks for the quick reaction! we just tested you changes and it works the opposite way it should. this means: when we do not send an uuid, we get an an error (Reply-Text = -ERR invalid session id []). if we send a wrong/not existing uuid, the command will be executed on the inbound uuid. #1 seems hard to believe. Please provide a console trace of the channel *ignoring* the hangup command. i know it is hard to believe, we didn't believe it either ;-) have a look at http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/6367 what we simply do here: the inbound is coming in, then we do an originate and hang up the inbound. then we directly send a hangup for the outbound. the outbound will go on ringing. then, when the ringing outbound is answered, we directly get the hangup. fs gets the hangup and remembers it, but seems to wait till the answer to execute this command. ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Proto specific hangup cause issue
it is protocol neutral, that's why it starts with sip_ the variable can be any of: send_bye recv_bye send_cancel send_refuse using that value you can determine the information you asked. I answered your specific question which was: determining which side hanged up. Maybe you should beat around the bush less with your requirements for your application you are expecting me to support for you. I already added 2 patches for you right. Just be clear about what you want. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Not necessarily. For instance I got a send_cancel when the calling party hanged up before the other party could pick up. Also, shouldn't something like that be protocol/technology neutral? Anthony Minessale wrote: sip_hangup_disposition will be set to recv_bye on the side that was hungup. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Any updates about the which side hanged up potential variable? Michael S Collins wrote: Makes sense. I will look into this. -MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sending this second email to request/suggest/enquire about something relevant : Wouldn't it be useful to know which end of a specific call leg send the protocol specific hangup cause? Otherwise it would be difficult to understand what really happened. Michael S Collins wrote: I will do some research on this and let you know what I find out. Question: are these internal calls or pstn or ?? Just curious about your environment. Thanks, MC On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The proto_specific_hangup_cause is missing on one of the two call legs. When the caller hangs up it is missing from the a-leg CDR. When the callee hangs up it is missing from the b-leg CDR. Is this nornal? And another question : what piece of info could inform me about who hanged up? -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 -- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org -- --- Apostolos Pantsiopoulos Kinetix Tele.com R D email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two nice to have features in fs
great, that works! thanks a lot!
just tested the changes according an error, when a file is missing.
thanks again!
2008/12/8 Anthony Minessale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
done
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh?
src/switch_core_session.c vom line 899 to 901:
if (seconds 10) {
seconds = 60;
}
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
try the sendmsg issue again are you doing the hangup with api uuid_kill uuid On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #2 was because when you sendmsg with no uuid on an outbound socket it defaults to the session who called you. I changed to code to make a distinction between not supplying a uuid and supplying an invalid uuid. anthony, thanks for the quick reaction! we just tested you changes and it works the opposite way it should. this means: when we do not send an uuid, we get an an error (Reply-Text = -ERR invalid session id []). if we send a wrong/not existing uuid, the command will be executed on the inbound uuid. #1 seems hard to believe. Please provide a console trace of the channel *ignoring* the hangup command. i know it is hard to believe, we didn't believe it either ;-) have a look at http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/6367 what we simply do here: the inbound is coming in, then we do an originate and hang up the inbound. then we directly send a hangup for the outbound. the outbound will go on ringing. then, when the ringing outbound is answered, we directly get the hangup. fs gets the hangup and remembers it, but seems to wait till the answer to execute this command. ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
i have to shift places. will be back in a few minutes and test. no, we are using the simple sendmsg uuid hangup. as far as we remember, we do not use api uuid_kill, because we do not get a hangup event with this. 2008/12/8 Anthony Minessale [EMAIL PROTECTED]: try the sendmsg issue again are you doing the hangup with api uuid_kill uuid ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
you would get a hangup event in either case. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have to shift places. will be back in a few minutes and test. no, we are using the simple sendmsg uuid hangup. as far as we remember, we do not use api uuid_kill, because we do not get a hangup event with this. 2008/12/8 Anthony Minessale [EMAIL PROTECTED]: try the sendmsg issue again are you doing the hangup with api uuid_kill uuid ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
you would get a hangup event in either case. yes, you are right. we just tested and saw that. the reason for sendmsg hangup, was the sometimes useful event-lock. it works with api uuid_kill as we wanted. but with sendmsg hangup it still does not work. shouldn't sendmsg hangup work like uuid_kill here? how useful could it be, to let it ring, when the hangup was already sent and is immediately executed when the anser is sent? #2 now works perfectly. thanks for the great support! ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Catching hangups
Hi, I'm writing an IVR in Lua and am having problems dealing with hangups cleanly. Very often session:ready() reports true long after I have hung up and the hangup hook function I have set doesn't get called either. It seems to report that the session is active indefinitely in some cases where a loop keeps trying to get some dtmf key presses. Is there any trick to using session:ready() or the hangup hook that I might have missed? On a slightly related point I can't seem to access the session properties, e.g. session.caller_id_num has a value of nil. Any thoughts here? Thanks in advance, Joe Bain ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
channels in originate were not checking for private events. now they should but if send them commands to do crazy stuff like play a file while they are in the middle of originating there could be ill side effects (e.g. play file before media was established etc which could cause the call to abort) btw you can send call-command: hangup hangup-cause: normal_clearing in place of call-command: execute execute-app-name: hangup execute-app-arg: normal_clearing On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you would get a hangup event in either case. yes, you are right. we just tested and saw that. the reason for sendmsg hangup, was the sometimes useful event-lock. it works with api uuid_kill as we wanted. but with sendmsg hangup it still does not work. shouldn't sendmsg hangup work like uuid_kill here? how useful could it be, to let it ring, when the hangup was already sent and is immediately executed when the anser is sent? #2 now works perfectly. thanks for the great support! ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] pstn:213-799-1400 ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Catching hangups
Joe, A few questions... what svn rev are you running? Which operating system? Finally, is it possible for you to put your dialplan and Lua script up at pastebin.freeswitch.org? Thanks, MC On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Joe Bain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm writing an IVR in Lua and am having problems dealing with hangups cleanly. Very often session:ready() reports true long after I have hung up and the hangup hook function I have set doesn't get called either. It seems to report that the session is active indefinitely in some cases where a loop keeps trying to get some dtmf key presses. Is there any trick to using session:ready() or the hangup hook that I might have missed? On a slightly related point I can't seem to access the session properties, e.g. session.caller_id_num has a value of nil. Any thoughts here? Thanks in advance, Joe Bain ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Read app ignores custom variable when called via socket interface
i added a patch to index the variables on the
SWITCH_EVENT_CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE
if you want to update
otherwise you can use uuid_getvar to retrieve the variable
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jan Kubr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK my bad. The variable is set (I can see it in the Freeswitch console
when I use the info app), but they are only not send to me via the
socket interface. I get the variable_* variables only in the
beginning (after calling connect), but not in the events. How do I
enable this?
Thanks,
Jan
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Anthony Minessale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems unlikely.
You sure about that?
The var param is in the middle of the data which is passed as 1 giant
string
to the same exact app execution code.
I don't see how it could differentiate
did you try executing the info app right after to see all the vars.
I'm not saying i don't believe you but it seems fishy.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Jan Kubr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I checked out the current trunk (rev 10641) and found out that the
read app ignores the varname parameter, it always puts the result in
the DTMF-Digit variable. I'm calling it via the socket interface:
sendmsg
call-command: execute
execute-app-name: read
execute-app-arg: 1 1 en/us/callie/conference/8000/conf-pin.wav res 1
#
event-lock:true
In the XML dialplan it works fine:
action application=read data=1 1
sounds/en/us/callie/conference/8000/conf-pin.wav res 1 #/
action application=phrase data=spell,${res}/
I have been using the socket call above successfully in the 1.0.1
release.
Any ideas? Thanks,
Jan Kubr
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888
googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
pstn:213-799-1400
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] key tone trigger event during call
From my understanding, I didn't think tone_detect detects DTMF since it's dual frequencies, rather tone_detect detects single frequencies like fax tones. I would just run an IVR with a session.read or session.getDigits to collect DTMF. Dan On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Frank @ Impact [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same thing with version 10640 build. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 1:01 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] key tone trigger event during call make current or install current svn on a different box. /b On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Frank @ Impact wrote: Ideas? Am I doing something stupid or is tone_detect not just right here? ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] key tone trigger event during call
Are you really trying to detect a tone, or are you trying to detect dtmf (could be delivered via rfc2833, info, etc) ? Mike On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Dan Le wrote: From my understanding, I didn't think tone_detect detects DTMF since it's dual frequencies, rather tone_detect detects single frequencies like fax tones. I would just run an IVR with a session.read or session.getDigits to collect DTMF. Dan On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Frank @ Impact [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same thing with version 10640 build. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 1:01 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] key tone trigger event during call make current or install current svn on a different box. /b On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Frank @ Impact wrote: Ideas? Am I doing something stupid or is tone_detect not just right here? ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] No audio after transfer
I'm trying to get an attended transfer work with freeSWITCH, but it's not quite working. I have Microsoft Speech Server on one side and Televantage on the other. MSS is originating a call, which freeSWITCH is bridging to Televantage. That calls connects just fine. Then, MSS sends a re-INVITE to Televantage to put the call on hold. This works too. Then, MSS originates another call to freeSWITCH, which is again bridged to Televantage. This works fine too. Then, MSS sends a REFER to freeSWITCH to do the transfer. The transfer should be complete, but there is no audio between the two calls-just silence. I have looked at pcaps and the freeSWITCH logs, but I'm not seeing anything obviously wrong. After the REFER, I can see audio for both calls going between freeSWITCH and Televantage, so it seems that the only thing missing is freeSWITCH routing the audio from one call to the other call and vice-versa. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have a pcap and the freeSWITCH logs, and I can easily reproduce this. Thanks! John ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] No audio after transfer
Are you on SVN trunk? If not what rev? /b On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:36 PM, John Rutherford wrote: Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have a pcap and the freeSWITCH logs, and I can easily reproduce this. Thanks! John ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] No audio after transfer
Sorry. I forgot to mention that. I checked out the trunk last week. I have revision 10597. John From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:48 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] No audio after transfer Are you on SVN trunk? If not what rev? /b On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:36 PM, John Rutherford wrote: Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have a pcap and the freeSWITCH logs, and I can easily reproduce this. Thanks! John ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Jitter + Packet Loss
I'm curious to start a discussion on being able to query a channel and get statistics on the incoming jitter and packet loss (calculated from the RTP, not RTCP). Is this on the roadmap? Is it hard to do? Would be very useful for us indeed! Thanks - JP ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
