Re: [Freeswitch-users] XMPP (mod_dingaling) for Event s/Messaging
I reviewed the code for chat_send. But if I'm reading it right, its designed to send a message to a channel. In reading the wiki page for mod_dingaling, it looks like FS registers a user with a server, then waits for someone to "call" them with an XMPP client. at that point it will create a channel. In my case I want to send/receive a message to/from the user freeswitch registered without a call being placed.Unless, during the registration, FS created a UUID for the open XMPP connection, in which case how would I find that UUID?-pete Original Message Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] XMPP (mod_dingaling) for Events/Messaging From: Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com Date: Fri, September 25, 2009 7:22 pm To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org see chat_send api command and api_hangup_hook. In combination that might work.MikeOn Sep 25, 2009, at 6:07 PM, Pete Mueller wrote:Hello all, I was wondering if anyone has used mod_dingaling for messaging rather than voice/video. Specifically, I would like to have FS send an XMPP message to an ActiveMQ server when it records a voicemail. Additionally I would like like to have CDR entries posted into the ActiveMQ server as calls are completed.It seems all the pieces are there, just not necessarily used for this task. My fall-back would be to use Event Socket to receive events and then forward them on to the MQ server. But if I could directly integrate it, that would be one less system to worry about.Any help would be appreciated.-pete ___FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-usersUNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Freeswitch-dev] Status of ubuntu/debian packages.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Massimo CtRiX Cetra ctrix...@navynet.it wrote: Mathieu Parent ha scritto: Can you also add the tts_commandline module? Patch attached Your patch was incomplete. The fixed one is in 14976. Thanks Mathieu ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia regiter to provider with multiple account
2009/9/26 Brian West br...@freeswitch.org: Why would they require you to have 50 accounts? Doesn't seem sane to me. They provide for pc to phone user and i want to use for my corp. :) /b On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: 2009/9/26 Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com: On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: Dear All, How to config freeswitch for support this case ? 1. FS register to provider about 50 user account. (Each account can't support multiple call in same time) Sofia gateways 2. FS Check account not inuse before call out. mod_limit 3. User account should be round-robin what does this mean? Each user account have own balance (in provider). So i want to use all user ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] missing file default.dic in sample application gino's pizza (mod pocketsphinx)
Hi, I have configured the sample application gino's pizza . If I call FreeSwitch with a softphone, the call is established and a voice tells Welcome to gino's pizza. So far so good, but in the console output I see the error Can't open dictionary c: \freeswitch2\debug\grammar\default.dic. (complete console output see below) Where can I find the default.dic ? It cannot be found on my pc and google didn't find it. What can I do now? Regards scaram freeswi...@nb-msi 2009-09-26 14:44:17.718000 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:613 New Channel sofia/internal/1...@192.168.1.33 [ddf97ba6-b65b-d54a-9a11-ff83a3104 f86] 2009-09-26 14:44:17.734000 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:391 Processing 1002 FreeSwi tch-54321 in context default 2009-09-26 14:44:17.737000 [NOTICE] mod_spidermonkey.c:2059 Channel [sofia/inter nal/1...@192.168.1.33] has been answered 2009-09-26 14:44:19.946000 [ERR] mod_pocketsphinx.c:142 Can't open dictionary c: \freeswitch2\debug\grammar\default.dic. 2009-09-26 14:44:19.946000 [INFO] mod_pocketsphinx.c:227 Port Closed. 2009-09-26 14:44:19.946000 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_async.c:2149 Hangup sofia/interna l/1...@192.168.1.33 [CS_EXECUTE] [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] 2009-09-26 14:44:19.955000 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1087 Session 3 (sofia/ internal/1...@192.168.1.33) Ended 2009-09-26 14:44:19.955000 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1089 Close Channel sof ia/internal/1...@192.168.1.33 [CS_DESTROY] _ http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M0906xFTP_SpringCampaign2 -- Für Fotos hier abdrücken -___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia regiter to provider with multiple account
Why would they require you to have 50 accounts? Doesn't seem sane to me. /b On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: 2009/9/26 Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com: On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: Dear All, How to config freeswitch for support this case ? 1. FS register to provider about 50 user account. (Each account can't support multiple call in same time) Sofia gateways 2. FS Check account not inuse before call out. mod_limit 3. User account should be round-robin what does this mean? Each user account have own balance (in provider). So i want to use all user ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Mod_vmd and Session Locking.
Hello All, I'm trying to do a simple dialer, where I am: 1. Initiating mod_vmd on channel answer. 2. Staying quiet until there is a beep. 3. Leave a message on beep. 4. Hangup. (in my scenario it's guaranteed to hit voicemail.) But the session isn't exiting properly after hangup, with last statement being: switch_core_session.c:1068 Session 1 (sofia/external/1002) Locked, Waiting on external entities. It doesn't go to CS_DONE state. I see [CRIT] level logs when shutting down freeswitch waiting for all these sessions to complete. But all these sessions are getting stuck while attempting to get a write lock on session object. I tried this with both 1.0.3 and 1.0.4 and the behavior is similar. Can someone please help? Or point me toward fixing it? Thanks, Gubbi. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET
Sorry for fading off for a few days. Having too much fun doing stuff! A few responses: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Michael Giagnocavo m...@giagnocavo.netwrote: A few questions I have: Testability – is this even remotely practical? I've seen three areas of testability: 1) Interop 2) Module Extensibility Framework 3) Modules and Plugins The interop testability picture is not an area I'm very familiar. I imagine you could write a native mod_managed.dll testing shim and test against that. I think this would have some limited value. It would confirm that interop layers behaved as expected, but not much more. The biggest values would be a) verifying that the api doesn't change accidentally, and b) providing a good way of adding bug-solution cases when the behavior of the core is causing a failure that we need to provide some padding around. The extensibility portion is very easy to write tests for. The module loader framework that I've refactored out of your code is completely stupid about the unmanaged code. It blindly passes the pointers through to the consumers that want them, and all of the module loader responsibilities are in managed code and mostly coded to interface. Very easy to mock and test. Finally the plugin testability story. Currently this is harder, since the plugins are written to talk to a lot of static methods and direct unmanaged types. As things evolve, I'd want to create a updated plugin interface that passes all the interop points by interface. The unit testing responsibility for an app or api plugin should primarily be that for a given set of inputs or responses, it makes a specified set of calls. That should be possible to mock and test in managed code if we provide a thin managed interface layer over the P/Invoke|SWIG layer. I'm currently writing a plugin that does just this, but I have the interface layer inside my code. Not everyone should have to write their own though? Modularity – I agree there are two parts. But, I think they are pretty tightly coupled. The FS interface into unmanaged code is done via unmanaged code and is really clear: App, Api, ApiBackground. The other ways I can think of are FS-specific, such as XML binding interface and so on. But those are things we should just add to the mod_managed core and be done with. I’m thinking maybe we are talking about different things? Can you provide some user stories that we want to cover with a pluggable loader/executor/etc.? I'm going to be a bit long-winded here. I hope I can clarify my intent, because I think I've been unclear on it so far. A) Philosophy: I have two principal concepts that are guiding me in my push towards modularity. 1) Single Responsibility Principal: Each class or code file should only have one reason to change. I don't think I'm quite here in the code I've shown you, but it's getting closer. (I could definitely use help.) The idea here is that the class that monitors the plugin directory shouldn't also load the files. The class that loads the files shouldn't be responsible for configuring and creating app domains. Neither of those classes should have concrete logging code in them. The good thing about this is that you don't have to worry about breaking the loader when you change the watcher, and vice-versa. If we later decide to change the watcher so that it only checks for updates manually, we don't need to even let the loader know. 2) Open-Closed Principal: Classes should be open for extension and closed for modification. The idea here is that once we've written a working class that has it's bugs ironed out and it's unit tests written, we shouldn't (ideally) ever need to change it. If we need a new behavior, we can just subclass the original, or implement the same interface, or whatever, and use the new class instead of the old one. If everything is nice an loosely coupled, we can just slide the new implementation in for improved behavior without changing the old one. What this means for the module system is that we can create new functionality without breaking old functionality. B) Actual uses: (Please note, that in most cases, I don't think that mod_managed needs to build out these functions, rather, I think mod_managed should get out of the way and let developers plug in what they want) 1) Commercial PBX Developer/Distributor: Case: Say I want to write my own FreeSWITCH distro/UI/packaged software on Windows, and I want to do all of my development in managed code and I don't care about plugins or anything. Answer: recompile my managed.dll with just a few changed lines in Loader.cs and your code controls everything coming into mod_managed. Ultimate power. Roll your own. Use it to launch a UI. Go nutz. 2) Complicated interwoven plugins: Case: I want to write a bunch of plugin dlls and have them all cross-communicate and share caches and statics. Answer: provide your own implementation of IModuleLoader and plug it into the registry. Now you can eliminate all of those pesky
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET
I don't know what we'd want to write endpoints for, so I'll leave that one alone... ;) I do, however, agree with you on the event handler idea. My work on the module system is largely a precursor to putting in some work on a pub/sub event bus in managed code. I wanted some lifecycle and exception handling control that wasn't easy in the existing dll and I wanted to be able to create it without breaking stuff for other people. My question is this: is an event bus a good thing to put in mod_managed, or should it be an optional plugin that you load in? Josh On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com wrote: There are a few other things I can think would be nice additions to mod_managed. Maybe an event handler that does not require a thread to be sitting and waiting for events trying in a loop would be nice, instead something that is triggered each time there is a certain event class triggered. Also, there has been some interest in doing full endpoint modules in mod_managed. exposing all the state handlers in .net like ways and having that all work would be quite interesting, but probably requires someone specific actually ready to write a module like that to be worthwhile. Mike On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: Great – hopefully we’ll meet on IRC or the conference sometime on Friday. Email me when you’re on. A few questions I have: Clarity – I agree with you there, and thanks! Testability – is this even remotely practical? Looking at our FS code plugins, there’s simply no way any amount of test environment code would get us to anything testable. We make tons of direct P/Invoke calls, and the whole model for what variables are set when, the state machine progression, etc. does not seem like something that we can hope to possibly model right. And it’s subject to many external influences (all the modules you have loaded in FS). Logging is a pretty simple case, sure, we can make it not call FS for testing. But in a real app, it just seems that there are way too many dependencies, no? Maybe others who have apps written can chime in? Modularity – I agree there are two parts. But, I think they are pretty tightly coupled. The FS interface into unmanaged code is done via unmanaged code and is really clear: App, Api, ApiBackground. The other ways I can think of are FS-specific, such as XML binding interface and so on. But those are things we should just add to the mod_managed core and be done with. I’m thinking maybe we are talking about different things? Can you provide some user stories that we want to cover with a pluggable loader/executor/etc.? Thanks for putting up with me! -Michael *From:* freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Rivers *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:32 AM *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Michael Giagnocavo m...@giagnocavo.net wrote: Right off the bat: there can be tons of cleanup and refactoring, no doubt about that. Much of the current code is to satisfy my needs in production, which it does very well. The current base doesn't have anything wrong with it for sure, in fact, I learned a good bit about PInvoke. AppDomains, and In-Process Remoting in the last week. My refactoring had the following goals (in no particular order) - Testability - I'd really like to see a decent unit test suite on the more module so that we can change it with confidence. Also, it's been drilled into me that a testable design is a good design. - Clarity - Where possible, I extracted blocks of code that served a particular purpose so that purpose could be self-documenting in the method calls rather than mixed in. - Modularity - I wanted to make it easy to remove or add alternative behavior to the managed.dll. I’m a bit hesitant to go too far from the FreeSWITCH core as far as architecture goes. For instance, I’m not quite sure why’d we have our own managed logging subsystem that allows them to plug in other things that aren’t part of FS. Either they should use the FS logging system, or use their own such as log4net. Or perhaps I don’t see why we’d want this behavior. I completely agree, with the following caveats: 1) I'd like to see things testable. It's very hard to do isolation testing with classes making direct calls out to a static Log class that in turn pinvokes out to unmanaged code. 2) I'd like to allow folk to make changes to the default behavior (optimally) without recompiling managed.dll. One thing at issue here is that there are two principal purposes for managed.dll. The first is to provide an interface into unmanaged code. The second is a module/plugin extensibility framework. The first purpose should absolutely provide the thinnest layer possible. The second
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sofia regiter to provider with multiple account
I would write a simple lua script to do a round robin hunt. 2009/9/27 Dome Charoenyost d...@tel.co.th 2009/9/26 Brian West br...@freeswitch.org: Why would they require you to have 50 accounts? Doesn't seem sane to me. They provide for pc to phone user and i want to use for my corp. :) /b On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: 2009/9/26 Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com: On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: Dear All, How to config freeswitch for support this case ? 1. FS register to provider about 50 user account. (Each account can't support multiple call in same time) Sofia gateways 2. FS Check account not inuse before call out. mod_limit 3. User account should be round-robin what does this mean? Each user account have own balance (in provider). So i want to use all user ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Mod_vmd and Session Locking.
what's your rev? I think rev14494 might related to you. 2009/9/27 Vinuth Madinur vinuth.madi...@gmail.com Hello All, I'm trying to do a simple dialer, where I am: 1. Initiating mod_vmd on channel answer. 2. Staying quiet until there is a beep. 3. Leave a message on beep. 4. Hangup. (in my scenario it's guaranteed to hit voicemail.) But the session isn't exiting properly after hangup, with last statement being: switch_core_session.c:1068 Session 1 (sofia/external/1002) Locked, Waiting on external entities. It doesn't go to CS_DONE state. I see [CRIT] level logs when shutting down freeswitch waiting for all these sessions to complete. But all these sessions are getting stuck while attempting to get a write lock on session object. I tried this with both 1.0.3 and 1.0.4 and the behavior is similar. Can someone please help? Or point me toward fixing it? Thanks, Gubbi. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] confuse of regex command with |
Hi, is this a bug? freeswi...@internal regex 10|09|10 false freeswi...@internal regex 10|10 true freeswi...@internal regex 10|(09|10) false freeswi...@internal 2009-09-27 11:47:00.815355 [ERR] switch_regex.c:101 COMPILE ERROR: 4 [missing )][(09] the first one should be true? ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Mod_vmd and Session Locking.
Yeah. Anthm fixed it. Was talking over on IRC yesterday. Thanks for the fix. On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Seven Du dujinf...@gmail.com wrote: what's your rev? I think rev14494 might related to you. 2009/9/27 Vinuth Madinur vinuth.madi...@gmail.com Hello All, I'm trying to do a simple dialer, where I am: 1. Initiating mod_vmd on channel answer. 2. Staying quiet until there is a beep. 3. Leave a message on beep. 4. Hangup. (in my scenario it's guaranteed to hit voicemail.) But the session isn't exiting properly after hangup, with last statement being: switch_core_session.c:1068 Session 1 (sofia/external/1002) Locked, Waiting on external entities. It doesn't go to CS_DONE state. I see [CRIT] level logs when shutting down freeswitch waiting for all these sessions to complete. But all these sessions are getting stuck while attempting to get a write lock on session object. I tried this with both 1.0.3 and 1.0.4 and the behavior is similar. Can someone please help? Or point me toward fixing it? Thanks, Gubbi. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET
The ability to directly create swigtypes...that's huge! I'd love to see some examples of how to use that. I've update my refactoring to include the changes to the trunk up through r14981. I've also checked in updated binaries that should work with the latest trunk builds(I hope?) A question occurred to me: would it make any sense to push the plugin loader into a separate DLL? That way we could keep the P/Invoke layer very cleanly separated from the loader/process host/abstraction layer structures. Josh On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Michael Giagnocavo m...@giagnocavo.netwrote: There is a new function I checked in a little bit ago that lets you create any of the SWIGTYPE_p_xxx types – all you need is a pointer to the memory to represent whatever it is in native land. So with that, it’s actually possible to call most or all of the functions. (Yes DRK, you can now go do XML binding.) But sure, it’d be nice to make a real .NET-ish layer. Async events seems like it wouldn’t be hard, assuming FreeSWITCH delivers them that way? -Michael *From:* freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Jerris *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:26 PM *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET There are a few other things I can think would be nice additions to mod_managed. Maybe an event handler that does not require a thread to be sitting and waiting for events trying in a loop would be nice, instead something that is triggered each time there is a certain event class triggered. Also, there has been some interest in doing full endpoint modules in mod_managed. exposing all the state handlers in .net like ways and having that all work would be quite interesting, but probably requires someone specific actually ready to write a module like that to be worthwhile. Mike On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: Great – hopefully we’ll meet on IRC or the conference sometime on Friday. Email me when you’re on. A few questions I have: Clarity – I agree with you there, and thanks! Testability – is this even remotely practical? Looking at our FS code plugins, there’s simply no way any amount of test environment code would get us to anything testable. We make tons of direct P/Invoke calls, and the whole model for what variables are set when, the state machine progression, etc. does not seem like something that we can hope to possibly model right. And it’s subject to many external influences (all the modules you have loaded in FS). Logging is a pretty simple case, sure, we can make it not call FS for testing. But in a real app, it just seems that there are way too many dependencies, no? Maybe others who have apps written can chime in? Modularity – I agree there are two parts. But, I think they are pretty tightly coupled. The FS interface into unmanaged code is done via unmanaged code and is really clear: App, Api, ApiBackground. The other ways I can think of are FS-specific, such as XML binding interface and so on. But those are things we should just add to the mod_managed core and be done with. I’m thinking maybe we are talking about different things? Can you provide some user stories that we want to cover with a pluggable loader/executor/etc.? Thanks for putting up with me! -Michael *From:* freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Rivers *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:32 AM *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Subscribing to events in managed C# / .NET On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Michael Giagnocavo m...@giagnocavo.net wrote: Right off the bat: there can be tons of cleanup and refactoring, no doubt about that. Much of the current code is to satisfy my needs in production, which it does very well. The current base doesn't have anything wrong with it for sure, in fact, I learned a good bit about PInvoke. AppDomains, and In-Process Remoting in the last week. My refactoring had the following goals (in no particular order) - Testability - I'd really like to see a decent unit test suite on the more module so that we can change it with confidence. Also, it's been drilled into me that a testable design is a good design. - Clarity - Where possible, I extracted blocks of code that served a particular purpose so that purpose could be self-documenting in the method calls rather than mixed in. - Modularity - I wanted to make it easy to remove or add alternative behavior to the managed.dll. I’m a bit hesitant to go too far from the FreeSWITCH core as far as architecture goes. For instance, I’m not quite sure why’d we have our own managed logging subsystem that allows them to plug in other things that
