Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity
Hi Shelby, Thanks! That's pretty useful. I also note that this same info is available from the CLI, although I was curious as to what some of the numbers indicated: UP 0 years, 13 days, 19 hours, 25 minutes, 48 seconds, 887 milliseconds, 975 microseconds 529509 session(s) since startup 26 session(s) 0/30 1000 session(s) max Specifically, 26 sessions 0/30... I take it this means there are 26 current sessions, but I'm unsure of what the "0/30" means. Cliff On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 15:19 -0500, Shelby Ramsey wrote: > Cliff, > > Try using xml_rpc ... status or show channels will give you what you need. > > SDR > > Cliff Wells wrote: > > A little off-topic, but since call-capacity is the subject, what are > > people using to analyze their CDR's to discover this? I'm handling > > about 30k calls per day but have only a bandwidth-based guesstimate of > > the peak number of concurrent calls I'm handling. > > > > If there's an open source solution, I'd appreciate a pointer. > > > > Regards, > > Cliff > > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:01 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote: > > > >> Although, FYI, I just benchmarked mod_xml_curl on a separate web app > >> server from FS with FS on a Dell R710 with their current best > >> processor option (Intel Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz with 8-cores total) and 32 > >> GB memory. The web app server is less than half the power of the R710. > >> I maxed the web app server at 300 calls per second (both setting up > >> and tearing down) and the R710 running FS was 65% idle. No audio was > >> being proxied through FS, though. If I were running the web app server > >> on an equivalent R710, they probably would have been on-par with each > >> other in performance. Extrapolating, I expect that in such a case I > >> should be able to get at least 650 CPS out of FS, though for > >> production I would probably limit it to 400 CPS or less so I leave > >> room for miscellaneous tasks. I maxed out the R710 at over 16,000 > >> simultaneous calls (again, no audio proxying) but the only reason I > >> couldn't do more was because I hit some sort of thread creation limit > >> in Linux. There was about 17 GB of memory used for this many calls. > >> This should give you some ballpark idea of what you can accomplish > >> with FS. > >> > >> At some point, I will track down and resolve the thread creation > >> issue, at which time I believe call limits will be limited either by a > >> complex combination of available memory, the speed of the processor, > >> the cost of thread context switching, calls per second setup rate, and > >> call duration. > >> > >> -- > >> Eliot Gable > >> > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> > >>> From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > >>> [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of > >>> Giovanni Maruzzelli > >>> > >>> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:56 PM > >>> > >>> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Vinuth Madinur > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Here are a few benchmarks that I had stumbled upon. > >>>> > >>>> http://wiki.voiceworks.pl/display/~pawel/FreeSwitch+performance+on+SUN+x2200+M2 > >>>> > >>> > >>> Please remember NO benchmarks are endorsed by the FS community or > >>> > >>> developers, because there are just too many variables, and a simple > >>> > >>> figure is just useful for marketing hype, not for real dimensioning. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> You MUST do your own benchmarking, so you get an idea about how to > >>> > >>> dimension for your own use case and hardware. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Vinuth. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Brian West wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I highly doubt it... You can wait for someon
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity
That's really nice looking software. Thanks for the pointer. Cliff On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 16:06 -0400, Gregory Boehnlein wrote: > I'm fond of Vqmanager from ManagEngine. It is a passive SIP monitor. I.E. > you mirror the ports that your FS or Asterisk boxes, and VQmanager sniffs > the mirrors, tracking all sorts of good data. > > You can install it on a Centos box, and get a free trial. > > http://www.manageengine.com/products/vqmanager/index.html > > What is really cool is that it actually monitors the RTP/RTCP as well as all > of the SIP headers and archives the calls, so you can look at calls from > several days ago and see EXACTLY what happened on them. I have used this > extensively to pinpoint bad Level 3 and X/O media gateways.. Much better > than trying to sniff packets in real-time and MAYBE catch a problem.. > > I've also used it to find/fix several SIP issues w/ odd endpoints.. Very > easy to see.. > > > -Original Message- > > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch- > > users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Cliff Wells > > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:52 PM > > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > > > > A little off-topic, but since call-capacity is the subject, what are > > people using to analyze their CDR's to discover this? I'm handling > > about 30k calls per day but have only a bandwidth-based guesstimate of > > the peak number of concurrent calls I'm handling. > > > > If there's an open source solution, I'd appreciate a pointer. > > > > Regards, > > Cliff > > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:01 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote: > > > Although, FYI, I just benchmarked mod_xml_curl on a separate web app > > > server from FS with FS on a Dell R710 with their current best > > > processor option (Intel Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz with 8-cores total) and > > 32 > > > GB memory. The web app server is less than half the power of the > > R710. > > > I maxed the web app server at 300 calls per second (both setting up > > > and tearing down) and the R710 running FS was 65% idle. No audio was > > > being proxied through FS, though. If I were running the web app > > server > > > on an equivalent R710, they probably would have been on-par with each > > > other in performance. Extrapolating, I expect that in such a case I > > > should be able to get at least 650 CPS out of FS, though for > > > production I would probably limit it to 400 CPS or less so I leave > > > room for miscellaneous tasks. I maxed out the R710 at over 16,000 > > > simultaneous calls (again, no audio proxying) but the only reason I > > > couldn't do more was because I hit some sort of thread creation limit > > > in Linux. There was about 17 GB of memory used for this many calls. > > > This should give you some ballpark idea of what you can accomplish > > > with FS. > > > > > > At some point, I will track down and resolve the thread creation > > > issue, at which time I believe call limits will be limited either by > > a > > > complex combination of available memory, the speed of the processor, > > > the cost of thread context switching, calls per second setup rate, > > and > > > call duration. > > > > > > -- > > > Eliot Gable > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > > > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > > [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:56 PM > > > > > > > > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Vinuth Madinur > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here are a few benchmarks that I had stumbled upon. > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.voiceworks.pl/display/~pawel/FreeSwitch+performance+on+SUN+ > > x2200+M2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please remember NO benchmarks are endorsed by the FS community or > > > > > > > > developers, because there are just too many variables, and a simple > > > > >
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity
A little off-topic, but since call-capacity is the subject, what are people using to analyze their CDR's to discover this? I'm handling about 30k calls per day but have only a bandwidth-based guesstimate of the peak number of concurrent calls I'm handling. If there's an open source solution, I'd appreciate a pointer. Regards, Cliff On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:01 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote: > Although, FYI, I just benchmarked mod_xml_curl on a separate web app > server from FS with FS on a Dell R710 with their current best > processor option (Intel Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz with 8-cores total) and 32 > GB memory. The web app server is less than half the power of the R710. > I maxed the web app server at 300 calls per second (both setting up > and tearing down) and the R710 running FS was 65% idle. No audio was > being proxied through FS, though. If I were running the web app server > on an equivalent R710, they probably would have been on-par with each > other in performance. Extrapolating, I expect that in such a case I > should be able to get at least 650 CPS out of FS, though for > production I would probably limit it to 400 CPS or less so I leave > room for miscellaneous tasks. I maxed out the R710 at over 16,000 > simultaneous calls (again, no audio proxying) but the only reason I > couldn't do more was because I hit some sort of thread creation limit > in Linux. There was about 17 GB of memory used for this many calls. > This should give you some ballpark idea of what you can accomplish > with FS. > > At some point, I will track down and resolve the thread creation > issue, at which time I believe call limits will be limited either by a > complex combination of available memory, the speed of the processor, > the cost of thread context switching, calls per second setup rate, and > call duration. > > -- > Eliot Gable > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > > [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:56 PM > > > > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Vinuth Madinur > > > > wrote: > > > > > Here are a few benchmarks that I had stumbled upon. > > > > > http://wiki.voiceworks.pl/display/~pawel/FreeSwitch+performance+on+SUN+x2200+M2 > > > > > > > > Please remember NO benchmarks are endorsed by the FS community or > > > > developers, because there are just too many variables, and a simple > > > > figure is just useful for marketing hype, not for real dimensioning. > > > > > > > > You MUST do your own benchmarking, so you get an idea about how to > > > > dimension for your own use case and hardware. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Vinuth. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Brian West wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> I highly doubt it... You can wait for someone to post their results > > > > >> but in the end you'll have to do your own load testing because not > > > > >> everyone's numbers will jive with your use case. Which is the reason > > > > >> the project never posts or endorses a set call count. > > > > >> > > > > >> /b > > > > >> > > > > >> On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Are there any benchmarking test results available publicly? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> ___ > > > > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > >> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > > > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > > > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- http://www.google.com/sea
Re: [Freeswitch-users] rdnis variable from Lua
I found a workaround, but it'd be nice to actually have the RDN easily accessible from Lua: calling_number = session:getVariable ( "sip_h_Diversion" ) _, _, calling_number = string.find ( calling_number, "sip:(%d+)@" ) Cliff On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 17:22 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote: > Hi, > > I can see the RDN in the log file, but don't know how to retrieve it > from a Lua script. > > Regards, > Cliff > > > ___ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] rdnis variable from Lua
Hi, I can see the RDN in the log file, but don't know how to retrieve it from a Lua script. Regards, Cliff ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Compact, fanless appliance?
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 04:47 -0700, Fred-145 wrote: > > EdPimentl wrote: > > Here is a list of the resources posted on this thread > > After giving it more thoughts, I got to the conclusion that I'd rather a > stand-alone miniPC that can take a PCI card with a riser, instead of a > really tiny box that relies on an external box to connect to a PSTN line. > > Mini-box offers a $120 kit that includes an Intel D945GCLF mobo and a > pico-PSU. All it misses, is RAM and some mass storage. > > Does someone know if there's some kind of CompactFlash that can connect to > an IDE port? That would save space + noise. http://www.google.com/products?q=ide+to+compact+flash&scoring=p Regards, Cliff ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
