[Freeswitch-users] [OT] Re: Scanning my firewall for open UDP ports?

2009-12-19 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Hristo Benev  wrote:
> Just for your information there is a version of nmap for windows. So you can 
> do the test from your desktop.

Funny that you assume his desktop is running Windows (maybe it is).  I
would have guessed that the average person on this list doesn't run
Windows on the desktop.  But, what do I know?

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Is anyone running Ubuntu 8.04/Hardy?

2009-10-19 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mark Sobkow
 wrote:
> Everyone I've emailed with on the dev list is running the current
> release of Ubuntu, not 8.04/Hardy.

Well, what issues?

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-12 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Michael Collins  wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Gabriel Gunderson  wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Michael Collins 
>> wrote:
>> > It seemed appropriate to do so, therefore I added a small snippet on the
>> > documentation guidelines:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Documentation_guidelines#Keep_It_Professional
>>
>> Good guidelines...
>>
>> Just in time to help the author of this lovely bit:
>> 'I would love some brief descriptions of what you guys are doing with
>> FreeSWITCH so I can write an article to shove down the throats of
>> idiots who keep saying that "FreeSWITCH is an Asterisk alternative
>> that offers basic PBX functionality."'
>
> Touché, my good man, touché. I'll fix that right away. :)

Never let it be said that you're not a good sport.

:)

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-12 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Michael Collins  wrote:
> It seemed appropriate to do so, therefore I added a small snippet on the
> documentation guidelines:
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Documentation_guidelines#Keep_It_Professional


Good guidelines...


Just in time to help the author of this lovely bit:
'I would love some brief descriptions of what you guys are doing with
FreeSWITCH so I can write an article to shove down the throats of
idiots who keep saying that "FreeSWITCH is an Asterisk alternative
that offers basic PBX functionality."'


Link:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FS_weekly_2009_10_09


Best,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_opal - call charged before H.225 connect

2009-10-08 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
Doesn't anyone trim on this list?

Gabe

P.S.  Sorry about the top post, but I was worried that if I bottom
posted, nobody would find it.


2009/10/8 Georgiewskiy Yuriy :
> On 2009-10-08 20:32 +0200, Tihomir Culjaga wrote 
> freeswitch-us...@lists.fre...:
>
> TC>Hi Yuriy,
> TC>
> TC>can you share what you have so far, I'm sure we can help with RTP part...
>
> I think there is a few days and i make it work, after this i start to test 
> and share it.
>
> TC>
> TC>T.
> TC>
> TC>2009/10/8 Georgiewskiy Yuriy 
> TC>
> TC>> On 2009-10-08 13:25 -0400, Tuyan ?zipek wrote
> TC>> freeswitch-us...@lists.freesw...:
> TC>>
> TC>> Tz>Hi,
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>2009/10/8 Georgiewskiy Yuriy :
> TC>> Tz>> On 2009-10-08 10:43 -0500, Anthony Minessale wrote
> TC>> freeswitch-us...@lists.f...:
> TC>> Tz>>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>If you are going to make that alternate module are you going to
> TC>> host it in
> TC>> Tz>> AM>the FS tree along side mod_opal?
> TC>> Tz>>
> TC>> Tz>> Yes, but then it be useful, now i have working only signaling part 
> and
> TC>> some
> TC>> Tz>> kinde of not working rtp part :)
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>If you dont use fs rtp stack, its unlikely that it will be accepted
> TC>> Tz>into the tree.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>also if were working on mod_opal why did you not try to involve 
> us
> TC>> and the
> TC>> Tz>> AM>opal team?
> TC>> Tz>>
> TC>> Tz>> Because i made patches for libopal, one is a bugfix in rtp part, 
> there
> TC>> is a race condition
> TC>> Tz>> in inicialisation in jitter buffer, another patch implements method 
> to
> TC>> send progress indicator,
> TC>> Tz>> and i don't wont spent my time to incorporate this changes into
> TC>> libopal.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>Thats bad.
> TC>> Tz>Any bugfixes from fs, goes to upstream on any of the used libraries.
> TC>> Tz>You should be doing the same.
> TC>> Tz>And Opal developers, will either include or refuse your patches. If
> TC>> Tz>they refuse it, they will give you the reason.
> TC>>
> TC>> i make this fix only to freeze my current mod_opal work on working state,
> TC>> while it now work for me i work on
> TC>> my new implementation of h323 proto for fs, i think opal developers will
> TC>> fix this rtp bug himself becouse
> TC>> it crashes and make library unuseful.
> TC>>
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>> without this changes
> TC>> Tz>> my work on mod_opal in freeswitch don't useful at all, i provide 
> link
> TC>> to my work with all
> TC>> Tz>> patches, if somebody wont incorporate it in libopal tree and fs - go
> TC>> on, but i think
> TC>> Tz>> better and more elegant make new module based on h323plus.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>If you dont publish your changes, all those you are trying to achieve,
> TC>> Tz>wont happen.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>How far away from what is in tree are these patches you have?
> TC>> Tz>> AM>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>2009/10/8 Georgiewskiy Yuriy 
> TC>> Tz>> AM>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> On 2009-10-07 15:09 -0500, Brian West wrote
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> freeswitch-us...@lists.freeswit...:
> TC>> Tz>> AM>>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> opal have addition abstraction layer called opalmgr, and it
> TC>> implementation
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> is not so good in
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> this case, for example to implemet pre_answer in mod_opal i 
> need
> TC>> patch
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> libopal, because
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>The patch you have in there, adds a method to the OpalCall,  it does
> TC>> Tz>not touch any parts of OpalManager
> TC>> Tz>so, i dont understand why opalmanager would be the cause of your pain?
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> there is no way to send progress inicator throuch opalmgr. and
> TC>> there is
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> many another issues like
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> this in that layer.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>Please point me to the issues you have in opal, their bug reports ,
> TC>> traces etc.
> TC>> Tz>I dont think any of the opal people has psychic abilities to detect
> TC>> Tz>-your- problems
> TC>> Tz>and solve them.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>>ftp://srv.icf.org.ru/pub/soft/f/freeswitch/ - there is
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> my work on mod_opal before
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> i start moving to h323plus, may be this help somebody there.
> TC>> Tz>> AM>>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW> From what I have been told h323plus is a based/fork of
> TC>> OpenH323 which
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>OPAL is just a continuation of OpenH323.  So why not support
> TC>> the
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>developers of OPAL/OpenH323 ?
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>/b
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Georgiewskiy Yuriy wrote:
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>> We are developing module to handle h323 proto now, we try 
> to
> TC>> use
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>> mod_opal and try improve it, but no luck,
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>> there is many issues in libopal, and finaly we now move to
> TC>> h323plus
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>> library.
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>Did any of you try to report those issues?
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>Regards
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>/tyn
> TC>> Tz>
> TC>> Tz>> AM>> BW>
> 

Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-08 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Michael Collins  wrote:
> Thanks for reporting back. Please let all the Asterisk users know that they
> are welcome to join us in #freeswitch on irc.freenode.net and that they will
> not be abused like people do in other less friendly IRC channels.

Funny you mention this.  Many people report that the way the FS
community refers to Asterisk in docs/wikis/irc/whatever makes the FS
camp seem *less* welcoming to them.  After all, they identify as
Asterisk Users and take the criticism as being kinda harsh.  Most of
them acknowledge the shortcomings of Asterisk but are put off when
someone else points them out.  It's crazy, I know.  The thing is, I
remember thinking that too.  After getting to know FS better, I didn't
notice it as much.  Nobody likes to hear their baby is ugly --even if
they know it is.

At our session, and in general, I've noticed people are more
interested in hearing about FS when you don't make direct comparisons
to Asterisk.  Besides, FS stands on it's own merit.

Just what I've observed *and* my 2 additional cents.

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-08 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Michael Collins  wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Gabriel Gunderson  wrote:
>> Naturally the wireless is jacked at the conf.  It's no match for the
>> 100's of geeks sporting laptops.  Thanks for the link. Looks like
>> we'll be shooting from the hip. :)
>>
> We experienced something similar at ClueCon, but it was that the hotel's
> DHCP server was a total wuss. :)

So, I just got back from the first day of the conference and there was
plenty of interest in FreeSWITCH from all the Asterisk users.  We had
a good time and answered lots of questions.  It was interesting to
hear what their perceptions about FS were.

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-08 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
Naturally the wireless is jacked at the conf.  It's no match for the
100's of geeks sporting laptops.  Thanks for the link. Looks like
we'll be shooting from the hip. :)

>From my phone,
Gabe

On Thursday, October 8, 2009, Michael Collins  wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Gabriel Gunderson 
> > wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> The 3rd annual UTOSC (Utah Open Source Conference) [1] starts today.
> It's a conference that gives Open Source users/hackers a chance gather
> together to mingle and share.  It's a lot of fun.  Anyway, this year
> I've offered to work with a friend of mine to lead a BoF (Birds of a
> Feather) discussion on Open Source Telephony [2].
>
> While it should mostly be group discussion, you never know when people
> are going to get shy and clam up.  *If* they do, it would be nice to
> have some slides to fill that time.  Rather than make some from
> scratch (that are unlikely to get used), I thought I'd ask here and
> see if anyone has a FS slide deck that they wouldn't mind sharing.
>
> Thanks,
> Gabe
>
>
> 1) http://2009.utosc.com/pages/home/
> 2) http://2009.utosc.com/presentation/136/
>
> There are numerous slides and such from ClueCon. Go to http://www.cluecon.com 
> and you can download both the video files as well as the actual 
> presentations. The presentation files are in various formats such as PPT(X), 
> PDF, and Keynote.
> The second presentation on day 1 is Anthony Minessale and he talks a lot 
> about expanding one's thinking when it comes to applying FreeSWITCH in 
> production. For example, some people will jump through crazy hoops to solve a 
> problem "because that's how they've always done it." Anyway, check out that 
> video and presentation file for some great ideas.
> -MC
>
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


[Freeswitch-users] FS Slide deck?

2009-10-08 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
Hey all,

The 3rd annual UTOSC (Utah Open Source Conference) [1] starts today.
It's a conference that gives Open Source users/hackers a chance gather
together to mingle and share.  It's a lot of fun.  Anyway, this year
I've offered to work with a friend of mine to lead a BoF (Birds of a
Feather) discussion on Open Source Telephony [2].

While it should mostly be group discussion, you never know when people
are going to get shy and clam up.  *If* they do, it would be nice to
have some slides to fill that time.  Rather than make some from
scratch (that are unlikely to get used), I thought I'd ask here and
see if anyone has a FS slide deck that they wouldn't mind sharing.

Thanks,
Gabe


1) http://2009.utosc.com/pages/home/
2) http://2009.utosc.com/presentation/136/

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bind to more than one ethernet interface

2009-09-25 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Anthony Minessale
 wrote:
> moral of the story is, it's unwise to bind multiple ip to a server interface
> that uses UDP signalling and the SIP spec requires
> a UA to have one specific URL

Yeah, I see that now.  I wasn't thinking about it as carefully as I
should have been.  Thanks for the clarification.

Best,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] User Creation with DB in Freeswitch

2009-09-23 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Anil Kumar S. R.  wrote:
> I didn't get much help for my problem with XML CURL. What I meant to say is,
> suppose I want to have some 1 users on freeswitch. Do we have to create
> some many xml files in the directory or is there some way in which the users
> can be put in the db ?

That's the whole point.  You serve up the XML from *your* web server
using whatever technologies that *you* would like on the back-end.
You'll want to make that XML reply dynamic.

Use php, perl, python, c#, java or whatever other language *you* want.
 Pull the data from MySQL, flat-files, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, LDAP or
whatever *you* want.  Just serve up the right bit of configuration to
FreeSWITCH and you're done.

Good luck.  Spend more time in the docs.  Others have posted the links.


Best,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bind to more than one ethernet interface

2009-09-23 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Seven Du  wrote:
> It not possible to use 0.0.0.0 for on profile. however, you can create more
> sip profiles for each of your interfaces. Search freeswitch-users archievs
> then you will find similar topics.

It sure would be nice to be able to provide a list of IPs in one
profile.  Seems like I run into that need often.  Instead, I end up
making two profiles that are mostly the same.

Is there a reason why this is the way it is?

Regards,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Status of ubuntu/debian packages.

2009-09-23 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, William King  wrote:

>Once we have some people using the packages, and testing them, I have
> already talked to some of the ubuntu official package maintainers about
> what would need to be done to add freeswitch into the ubuntu multiverse
> repo.
>
> Any questions?

No questions.  I'll start testing.  I'll be testing 8.04 and check in
on 9.10 from time to time.

Thanks for the great work.  Keep it up!

Best,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] A real puzzler for you guys... (perpetual registration causes denial of service.)

2009-09-16 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Karl Vesterling  wrote:
> It's a kernel bug that corrupted the sqlite database.
> This caused Freeswitch to refuse the phones registration request.
> This in turn caused the phones to re-register.
> Problem was, with 10 phones, 6 lines each, perpetually registering on a
> 100Mbps LAN, well, you can imagine the overhead.
> This created severe latency with Freeswitch, and manifested as dropped
> calls, one way audio, and the more phones you had, the worse the problem
> was.

> Workaround for problem was to use a ramdisk (tmpfs)  for the database - (Big
> Thanks to bkw!)

The data in the sqlite db doesn't need to survive a reboot?  Any
benefit if it does?

Also, I've read that the ramdisk isn't that different than what the
kernel already does to keep things in memory (yielding very little
gain).

Thoughts on this?

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Better results from mod_vmd

2009-08-20 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Fong wrote:
>> /*! Minimum time for a beep. */
>> #define MIN_TIME 8000
>> to 6500 and it seemed to work, but I'm not sure how many false positives I
>> will get in a real-world environment. at 4000 it fired the event like 5
>> times in a session, but 6500 only once. Do you think I should expect a lot
>> of false positives after changing this value?
>
> YES.

Err, NO.

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Better results from mod_vmd

2009-08-20 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Fong wrote:
> /*! Minimum time for a beep. */
> #define MIN_TIME 8000
> to 6500 and it seemed to work, but I'm not sure how many false positives I
> will get in a real-world environment. at 4000 it fired the event like 5
> times in a session, but 6500 only once. Do you think I should expect a lot
> of false positives after changing this value?

YES.

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] ClueCon2009 Torrents

2009-08-15 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Peder wrote:
> If you want the torrents, email me off list.

Why off list?  Isn't the point of torrents to have more people sharing
in the load?

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] arriving today for ClueCon

2009-08-04 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
> Cool, I wish I could be there, next year =D

Tomorrow is my wedding anniversary 8/5.  If ClueCon keeps getting
scheduled on that date, I don't know if I'll ever get to go :(


> Any pics or videos of ClueCon? :)

Yes, bring on the vids.

Best,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sonus - what's the latest?

2009-07-29 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Kristian
Kielhofner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Kristian
>> Kielhofner wrote:
>>>  I don't know of any new issues with Sonus as used by the carriers I
>>> deal with but YMMV.
>>
>> Wow.  I just finished reading 3 long pages of super drama over at
>> Yahoo! Finance :)
>
>  Ha, I can't believe you, um, wasted your time with that!  How are
> those guys doing?  We should drop in and see!

Dude.  Don't.  I now own SONS stock and I don't want to make waves ;)

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sonus - what's the latest?

2009-07-29 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Given the choice... I would avoid Sonus!  But thats my personal opinion.

I don't get to make the decision, just support it :)

Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sonus - what's the latest?

2009-07-29 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Kristian
Kielhofner wrote:
>  I don't know of any new issues with Sonus as used by the carriers I
> deal with but YMMV.

Wow.  I just finished reading 3 long pages of super drama over at
Yahoo! Finance :)

So, it sounds like the FS team has made provisions to work with Sonus'
borken RTP *and* if there are still issues, most of them can be
overcome by explicitly setting some variables in the FS config.

Does that sound like an accurate summary of the situation?

Thanks,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


[Freeswitch-users] Sonus - what's the latest?

2009-07-20 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
All,

Anyone setup FS with Sonus lately?  I've just ordered service for a
customer and it should be hooked-up pretty soon.  Since ordering, I
was made aware the they're using Sonus on the back-end.  Well, I've
been reading up on it and I'm getting a bit worried :(

Anyone know if this is still the state of things?
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/RTP_Issues#Sonus

Thanks,
Gabe

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org