Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bypass_media and re_invite

2009-11-27 Thread Steve Kurzeja
Is that USD ? :)


On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Anthony Minessale 
anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote:

 I can spare you the pain and let you know outright that this sort of
 functionality will cost somewhere in the range of 125,000.00 to 150,000.00
 to properly implement by assembling a team of consultants including members
 of the development team from both FreeSWITCH and Sofia-SIP and even if you
 have the money, finding the time to implement it would also be a factor as
 it's a few thousand man-hours of work.


 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mathieu Rene mrene_li...@avgs.ca wrote:

 You can read all about the sip library at
 http://sofia-sip.sourceforge.net/refdocs/

  Mathieu Rene
 Avant-Garde Solutions Inc
 Office: + 1 (514) 664-1044 x100
 Cell: +1 (514) 664-1044 x200
 mr...@avgs.ca




 On 25-Nov-09, at 3:58 PM, srinivasula reddy wrote:

 thanks for your reply mike,
 is there any api in freeswitch or any thing else to update lib
 programatically from pjsua.

 srinivas

 On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com wrote:

 something that is not available in that lib at this time.

 Mike

 On Nov 25, 2009, at 2:47 PM, srinivasula reddy wrote

 can please tell me how can i exchange session state into sip library.

 Thanks
 srinivas

 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.comwrote:

 For that you would need to fully exchange session state into the sip
 library, *something that is not available in that lib at this time.*


 On Nov 25, 2009, at 12:55 PM, srinivasula reddy wrote:

 HI,
 thanks for your reply, my requirement is i am doing failover stuff with
 freeswitch. i dont want cut the calls when freeswitch dies, when failover
 happens mean one freeswitch dies we are going to start the second
 freeswitch, i dont want close call intiated by the  first freeswtich, they
 are communicating with meida(bypass media). when one endpoing try to end 
 the
 call at that time i want to close the call for the other end also.


 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




 --
 Srinivasula Reddy K
  ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org



 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




 --
 Srinivasula Reddy K
  ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org



 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




 --
 Anthony Minessale II

 FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
 ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

 AIM: anthm
 MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com
 GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.compaypal%3aanthony.miness...@gmail.com
 IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

 FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
 sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org sip%3a...@conference.freeswitch.org
 iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.orggoogletalk%3aconf%2b...@conference.freeswitch.org
 pstn:213-799-1400

 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH HA + Loadbalancing

2009-08-29 Thread Steve Kurzeja
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes, FreeSWITCH is a system that you can trust 100%. I have switched my
 Asterisk servers to FreeSWITCH and have peace now.

 If I were you I would get rid of Asterisk and use FreeSWITCH, FS will
 handle all what you want very well.

 And I agree with David, fail-over is kinda irrelevant since the FS doesn't
 crash like Asterisk does.



You still have hardware failures and fail-over is also useful for hit-less
maintenance on boxes.

I'd be interested to know how Brian West was approaching his live migration
work.

Steve
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] upstream Registrar / Mirror proxy

2009-08-27 Thread Steve Kurzeja
A proxy won't do what the original poster is asking for. Upper registration
is a special type of function performed by SBCs and not defined by any RFC
yet but there are drafts out there. This question comes up quite often in
various mailing lists and has been asked this list before. The answer is no
freeswitch can't be configured to do this as it stands today.

The only opensource SBC I know of that attempts to do upper registration at
the moment is OpenSBC.  Otherwise there's vendor SBCs like ACME packet,
Nextone (now Genband -  they call it Mirror Proxy mode) etc which do it.

Regards,
Steve

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Ken Rice kr...@freeswitch.org wrote:

  FreeSWITCH is a B2BUA and NOT a proxy and will not proxy any requests
 (REGISTER or INVITE)

 If you want a Proxy you should look toward OpenSIPS


 --
 *From: *sylver_b sylve...@yahoo.com
 *Reply-To: *freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 *Date: *Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
 *To: *freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 *Subject: *[Freeswitch-users] upstream Registrar / Mirror proxy

 Hello,

 We would like to use FreeSwitch to test interoperability with our sip
 registrar platform - as our registrar doesnt handle NAT Traversal we would
 like to use FS as a mirror proxy .

 If a call goes through, FS should transparently handle nat traversal
 functionalities while forwarding the REGISTER/INVITE requests to our
 registrar server.

 Below some detailed requirements:
 Upper Registration is the capability of a SBC to proxy Registrations
 towards an upstream Registrar. While it is necessary that all SIP requests
 traverse the SBC for NAT continuity, Registrations should be allowed to be
 relayed towards our upstream Registrar while the SBC retains a copy of the
 AOR and masquerade on behalf of the UA that send the registration request.

 Please let us know the best way to configure FS to achieve this type of
 configuration.

 Thank you


 --
 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org

 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] Live Upgrade Techniques

2009-06-15 Thread Steve Kurzeja
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Michael Giagnocavo m...@giagnocavo.netwrote:

  Well, Nextone for instance has a database the keeps most of the state of
 calls, and it’s replicated between the two nodes. (I seem to recall the
 database was GNU dbm, but I might be mistaken.) However, as of 4.3 anyways,
 the CDRs still get truncated when there’s any kind of switchover.




BTW in Nextone v4.0.x the GNU db is used for storing configuration data like
storing routes  other bits which is then loaded into memory. Nextone 4.3
and above uses postgres for this configuration data. The actual call state
information is stored in memory and replicated to the standby box via some
custom network protocol.

Stateful call migration would be a very useful feature in FS but I imagine
its way down the roadmap.

But as to the original question of live upgrades,  having some form of load
balancing proxy and then bleeding off traffic from the box you want to
upgrade is the most feasible approach, as others have mentioned.

Steve
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org