Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
just an off-topic question but it concenns mass provissioning ... does anyone know if there is an open TR069 platform we can work on? T. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Kristian Kielhofner < > kristian.kielhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It appears that Tony has already added an option (amazing) BUT you >> should really be setup for central provisioning with an installed base >> that large... You'll eventually have issues that *NO* amount of >> Tony/FreeSWITCH magic can fix. >> >> Kristian is correct. Listen to him because he's familiar with having lots > and lots of units out in the field. The bandage Tony applied will eventually > wear off. The long-term solution is to treat the malady and not the symptom. > I'm certain that members of the FS community could point you toward some > resources to assist with central provisioning. > > -MC > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Don't forget the one where there was a typo in the one for G722 so now we are all required to emulate that typo by running a 16khz codec with 8khz timestamps and sdp params. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Arsen Chaloyan wrote: > Actually, there were a few more misinterpretations in earlier software of > Cisco Gateways, which RFC implementers had to address in RFC3551, strange > ... > > RTP Payload Type 19 remains reserved because "some implementations" wrongly > interpreted 13 decimal as 13 hexadecimal value. > Another issue is G726 bit packing. Again "some implementations" used wrong > bit packing and RFC3551 tried to partially resolve this conflict introducing > new payload format named AAL2-G726 ... > > -- > *From:* Brian West > *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > *Sent:* Tue, November 3, 2009 10:27:39 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem > > Sounds like bad planning. I would send out a memo to your users and > have them fix it. I have raised a bug multiple times with Cisco g729a > is NOT valid. > > /b > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > > > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > > > Thanks, > > M > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:213-799-1400 ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
At some point the paint will be rubbed off the magic lamp. /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > It appears that Tony has already added an option (amazing) BUT you > should really be setup for central provisioning with an installed base > that large... You'll eventually have issues that *NO* amount of > Tony/FreeSWITCH magic can fix. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
THE BLOODY MADNESS!!! I can only stop if people start saying 'NO'. :) /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: > Don't forget the one where there was a typo in the one for G722 so > now we are all required to emulate that typo by running a 16khz > codec with 8khz timestamps and sdp params. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Yah this one is LLLAME :P We have some dyslexic engineers. /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Arsen Chaloyan wrote: > Another issue is G726 bit packing. Again "some implementations" used > wrong bit packing and RFC3551 tried to partially resolve this > conflict introducing new payload format named AAL2-G726 ... ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
It appears that Tony has already added an option (amazing) BUT you should really be setup for central provisioning with an installed base that large... You'll eventually have issues that *NO* amount of Tony/FreeSWITCH magic can fix. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > Thanks, > M > -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.star2star.com http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.voalte.com ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Kristian Kielhofner < kristian.kielhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > It appears that Tony has already added an option (amazing) BUT you > should really be setup for central provisioning with an installed base > that large... You'll eventually have issues that *NO* amount of > Tony/FreeSWITCH magic can fix. > > Kristian is correct. Listen to him because he's familiar with having lots and lots of units out in the field. The bandage Tony applied will eventually wear off. The long-term solution is to treat the malady and not the symptom. I'm certain that members of the FS community could point you toward some resources to assist with central provisioning. -MC ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
I am willing to support this with the note that its incorrect and will not support it by default but update to trunk and try: this should fix it for you, SIGH On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Brian West wrote: > Sounds like bad planning. I would send out a memo to your users and > have them fix it. I have raised a bug multiple times with Cisco g729a > is NOT valid. > > /b > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > > > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > > > Thanks, > > M > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:213-799-1400 ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
so imagine how much money all those sipuras cost. They get all the money *and* have a bug and we are free and are supposed to break the rules for them. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > Thanks, > M > > On 03/11/2009, at 14:58, Brian West wrote: > > > FIx your sipura to NOT include the a in the codec its in the admin > > section of the UI on the ATA. > > > > /b > > > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm having a problem with a Sipura, it is sending for the G729 the > >> tag "G729a" witch is not correct due the RFC. > >> > >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 > >> > >> FS is returning (200OK) > >> > >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > >> > >> I think that the problem is that FS is not matching the codec, so it > >> returns the first dynamic payload which is 96. > >> > >> I think that I've seen post with a similar issue, and the solution > >> was > >> to change the tag before it hit the switch, so, what I've done is to > >> change the "switch_r_sdp" (I have the rest of the parameters correct > >> due I also use it to dynamically change the codecs order) and it's > >> changing the SDP, but when FS sends the 200OK it is returning to the > >> endpoint: > >> > >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > >> > >> Which is exactly the same problem that I have without the > >> transformation of the SDP. > >> > >> Is it correct? Do I have another solution? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > > > > > > ___ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:213-799-1400 ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Sounds like bad planning. I would send out a memo to your users and have them fix it. I have raised a bug multiple times with Cisco g729a is NOT valid. /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > Thanks, > M ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Hi, I'm having a problem with a Sipura, it is sending for the G729 the tag "G729a" witch is not correct due the RFC. Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 FS is returning (200OK) Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 I think that the problem is that FS is not matching the codec, so it returns the first dynamic payload which is 96. I think that I've seen post with a similar issue, and the solution was to change the tag before it hit the switch, so, what I've done is to change the "switch_r_sdp" (I have the rest of the parameters correct due I also use it to dynamically change the codecs order) and it's changing the SDP, but when FS sends the 200OK it is returning to the endpoint: Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 Which is exactly the same problem that I have without the transformation of the SDP. Is it correct? Do I have another solution? Thanks ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Actually, there were a few more misinterpretations in earlier software of Cisco Gateways, which RFC implementers had to address in RFC3551, strange ... RTP Payload Type 19 remains reserved because "some implementations" wrongly interpreted 13 decimal as 13 hexadecimal value. Another issue is G726 bit packing. Again "some implementations" used wrong bit packing and RFC3551 tried to partially resolve this conflict introducing new payload format named AAL2-G726 ... From: Brian West To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 10:27:39 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem Sounds like bad planning. I would send out a memo to your users and have them fix it. I have raised a bug multiple times with Cisco g729a is NOT valid. /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not > able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have > like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. > > Thanks, > M ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
Yes, that was my first option, but there many endpoints that I'm not able to configure. Basically it's a broadband solution where I have like 1000 endpoints that are out of my provisioning. Thanks, M On 03/11/2009, at 14:58, Brian West wrote: > FIx your sipura to NOT include the a in the codec its in the admin > section of the UI on the ATA. > > /b > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm having a problem with a Sipura, it is sending for the G729 the >> tag "G729a" witch is not correct due the RFC. >> >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 >> >> FS is returning (200OK) >> >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 >> >> I think that the problem is that FS is not matching the codec, so it >> returns the first dynamic payload which is 96. >> >> I think that I've seen post with a similar issue, and the solution >> was >> to change the tag before it hit the switch, so, what I've done is to >> change the "switch_r_sdp" (I have the rest of the parameters correct >> due I also use it to dynamically change the codecs order) and it's >> changing the SDP, but when FS sends the 200OK it is returning to the >> endpoint: >> >> Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 >> >> Which is exactly the same problem that I have without the >> transformation of the SDP. >> >> Is it correct? Do I have another solution? >> >> Thanks >> > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
FIx your sipura to NOT include the a in the codec its in the admin section of the UI on the ATA. /b On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with a Sipura, it is sending for the G729 the > tag "G729a" witch is not correct due the RFC. > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 > > FS is returning (200OK) > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > > I think that the problem is that FS is not matching the codec, so it > returns the first dynamic payload which is 96. > > I think that I've seen post with a similar issue, and the solution was > to change the tag before it hit the switch, so, what I've done is to > change the "switch_r_sdp" (I have the rest of the parameters correct > due I also use it to dynamically change the codecs order) and it's > changing the SDP, but when FS sends the 200OK it is returning to the > endpoint: > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > > Which is exactly the same problem that I have without the > transformation of the SDP. > > Is it correct? Do I have another solution? > > Thanks > ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Sipura Codec Problem
I think you can edit the prefs in your sipura and change it to the correct string. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Mariano de Llano wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with a Sipura, it is sending for the G729 the > tag "G729a" witch is not correct due the RFC. > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 > > FS is returning (200OK) > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > > I think that the problem is that FS is not matching the codec, so it > returns the first dynamic payload which is 96. > > I think that I've seen post with a similar issue, and the solution was > to change the tag before it hit the switch, so, what I've done is to > change the "switch_r_sdp" (I have the rest of the parameters correct > due I also use it to dynamically change the codecs order) and it's > changing the SDP, but when FS sends the 200OK it is returning to the > endpoint: > > Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 G729/8000 > > Which is exactly the same problem that I have without the > transformation of the SDP. > > Is it correct? Do I have another solution? > > Thanks > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:213-799-1400 ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
