Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-02 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and calls
> work perfectly.
> However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS
> without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY containing
> Message-Waiting information. But when I register via proxy, FS doesn't send
> this NOTIFY.
> What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug (F8)
> doesn't show anything for registration handling).
> I have just updated to trunk Revision 14729 and this behavior persists.
>
> Also, is it possible to disable this unsolicited MWI notification? (I want
> to send it only to subscribed terminals).
>

OK. I got it this is a bad idea. Now I understand this unsolicited MWI
notification is due to an implicit subscription and so, it is a good thing
because we will reduce load by not having to deal with separate SUBSCRIBE
requests.

However I have yet to figure out why this NOTIFY is not sent when the
REGISTER is relayed by a proxy.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-02 Thread Anthony Minessale 
Its because many phones cheat and just expect mwi without asking for it so
we send one on register.
There is an opt to disable it I think but I can't recall what it is atm

On Sep 2, 2009 9:20 PM, "mayamatakeshi"  wrote:



On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi 
wrote: > > Hello, > I'm test...

OK. I got it this is a bad idea. Now I understand this unsolicited MWI
notification is due to an implicit subscription and so, it is a good thing
because we will reduce load by not having to deal with separate SUBSCRIBE
requests.

However I have yet to figure out why this NOTIFY is not sent when the
REGISTER is relayed by a proxy.


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-03 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Anthony Minessale <
anthony.miness...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Its because many phones cheat and just expect mwi without asking for it so
> we send one on register.
> There is an opt to disable it I think but I can't recall what it is atm
>
Thanks.
I've located the option in the mod sofia source:
send-message-query-on-register
It seems it is not in the wiki. I will update the mod sofia page.


> On Sep 2, 2009 9:20 PM, "mayamatakeshi"  wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi 
> wrote: > > Hello, > I'm test...
>
> OK. I got it this is a bad idea. Now I understand this unsolicited MWI
> notification is due to an implicit subscription and so, it is a good thing
> because we will reduce load by not having to deal with separate SUBSCRIBE
> requests.
>
> However I have yet to figure out why this NOTIFY is not sent when the
> REGISTER is relayed by a proxy.
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-04 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and calls
> work perfectly.
> However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS
> without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY containing
> Message-Waiting information. But when I register via proxy, FS doesn't send
> this NOTIFY.
> What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug (F8)
> doesn't show anything for registration handling).
>

I have enabled Sofia debug and I can see NTA is complaining about invalid
URI when building the NOTIFY:

nua: nua_notify: entering
nua(0x9b3c1e8): sent signal r_notify
nua(0x9b3c1e8): recv signal r_notify
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x9b3c1e8): adding notify usage with event message-summary
nta_leg_tcreate(0x9b74c68)
nta outgoing create: invalid URI
nta: outgoing_free(0x9b74928)
nua(0x9b3c1e8): event r_notify 900 Internal error at nua_client.c:711
nua(0x9b3c1e8): removing notify usage with event message-summary

My REGISTER relayed by opensips is this:

REGISTER sip:test.com SIP/2.0
Record-Route:

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.100;branch=z9hG4bKe62c.49e9f6c1.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.121:5060
;received=192.168.2.121;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj4uAYgDuRbilYy4lCWcjlDKIDAtf-9RdS
Max-Forwards: 69
From: 
>;tag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5
To: >
Call-ID: JvQ.apMLiJtfHa7z4ShIfgBPi5jIbtBv
CSeq: 14872 REGISTER
Contact: 
Expires: 60
Authorization: Digest username="user1", realm="test.com",
nonce="7d911eef-2c16-4deb-99f6-afcff9968a19", uri="sip:192.168.2.100",
response="df29caeb78790b4527f1176622cbf192", algorithm=MD5,
cnonce="5.EXCbM3RZTx6iOh1cvUzUvEZTs2eheG", qop=auth, nc=0001
Content-Length:  0
Path: 
;lr;received=sip:192.168.2.121:5060>

I hope someone can point out a problem.
I'm looking at NTA with gdb but I'm slow on this.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-04 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:

>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
>> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and
>> calls work perfectly.
>> However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS
>> without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY containing
>> Message-Waiting information. But when I register via proxy, FS doesn't send
>> this NOTIFY.
>> What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug (F8)
>> doesn't show anything for registration handling).
>>
>
> I have enabled Sofia debug and I can see NTA is complaining about invalid
> URI when building the NOTIFY:
>
> nua: nua_notify: entering
> nua(0x9b3c1e8): sent signal r_notify
> nua(0x9b3c1e8): recv signal r_notify
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x9b3c1e8): adding notify usage with event message-summary
> nta_leg_tcreate(0x9b74c68)
> nta outgoing create: invalid URI
> nta: outgoing_free(0x9b74928)
> nua(0x9b3c1e8): event r_notify 900 Internal error at nua_client.c:711
> nua(0x9b3c1e8): removing notify usage with event message-summary
>
> My REGISTER relayed by opensips is this:
>
> REGISTER sip:test.com SIP/2.0
> Record-Route:
> 
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.100;branch=z9hG4bKe62c.49e9f6c1.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.121:5060
> ;received=192.168.2.121;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj4uAYgDuRbilYy4lCWcjlDKIDAtf-9RdS
> Max-Forwards: 69
> From: 
> >;tag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5
> To: >
> Call-ID: JvQ.apMLiJtfHa7z4ShIfgBPi5jIbtBv
> CSeq: 14872 REGISTER
> Contact: 
> Expires: 60
> Authorization: Digest username="user1", realm="test.com",
> nonce="7d911eef-2c16-4deb-99f6-afcff9968a19", uri="sip:192.168.2.100",
> response="df29caeb78790b4527f1176622cbf192", algorithm=MD5,
> cnonce="5.EXCbM3RZTx6iOh1cvUzUvEZTs2eheG", qop=auth, nc=0001
> Content-Length:  0
> Path: 
> ;lr;received=sip:192.168.2.121:5060>
>
> I hope someone can point out a problem.
> I'm looking at NTA with gdb but I'm slow on this.


The invalid URI nta is complaining about is the route_uri extracted from the
Contact stored upon registration.
The difference of behavior between INVITE (works) and NOTIFY (doesn't work)
via proxy, seems to be because for INVITE, mod_sofia code (function
sofia_glue_do_invite in sofia_glue.c) calls sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
to adjust the route_uri.
But for a NOTIFY, this function is not called (and it cannot be called, as
there's no session which is required as a parameter).

In my case I can see that basically what sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
does is to remove the "<" , ">" around the route_uri.
I messed with the code in sofia_glue_send_notify to just remove "<" and ">"
and after that I was able to receive the NOTIFY.
So I believe there is  some code lacking in FS to properly permit UAs
registering via proxy to receive NOTIFY.
I might be wrong: if there is anyone using this scenario successfully,
please let me know. Otherwise, I'll open a ticket on JIRA.

regards,
takeshi
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-11 Thread Michael Jerris 

Following up, did a bug get created for this issue?

Mike

On Sep 5, 2009, at 2:40 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote:



On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatakeshi  
 wrote:


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi  
 wrote:

Hello,
I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other  
and calls work perfectly.
However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with  
FS without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY  
containing Message-Waiting information. But when I register via  
proxy, FS doesn't send this NOTIFY.
What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug  
(F8) doesn't show anything for registration handling).


I have enabled Sofia debug and I can see NTA is complaining about  
invalid URI when building the NOTIFY:


nua: nua_notify: entering
nua(0x9b3c1e8): sent signal r_notify
nua(0x9b3c1e8): recv signal r_notify
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x9b3c1e8): adding notify usage with event message-summary
nta_leg_tcreate(0x9b74c68)
nta outgoing create: invalid URI
nta: outgoing_free(0x9b74928)
nua(0x9b3c1e8): event r_notify 900 Internal error at nua_client.c:711
nua(0x9b3c1e8): removing notify usage with event message-summary

My REGISTER relayed by opensips is this:

REGISTER sip:test.com SIP/2.0
Record-Route: >

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.100;branch=z9hG4bKe62c.49e9f6c1.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
192.168.2.121 
: 
5060 
;received 
= 
192.168.2.121 
;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj4uAYgDuRbilYy4lCWcjlDKIDAtf-9RdS

Max-Forwards: 69
From: ;tag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5
To: 
Call-ID: JvQ.apMLiJtfHa7z4ShIfgBPi5jIbtBv
CSeq: 14872 REGISTER
Contact: 
Expires: 60
Authorization: Digest username="user1", realm="test.com",  
nonce="7d911eef-2c16-4deb-99f6-afcff9968a19", uri="sip: 
192.168.2.100", response="df29caeb78790b4527f1176622cbf192",  
algorithm=MD5, cnonce="5.EXCbM3RZTx6iOh1cvUzUvEZTs2eheG", qop=auth,  
nc=0001

Content-Length:  0
Path: 

I hope someone can point out a problem.
I'm looking at NTA with gdb but I'm slow on this.

The invalid URI nta is complaining about is the route_uri extracted  
from the Contact stored upon registration.
The difference of behavior between INVITE (works) and NOTIFY  
(doesn't work) via proxy, seems to be because for INVITE, mod_sofia  
code (function sofia_glue_do_invite in sofia_glue.c) calls  
sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness to adjust the route_uri.
But for a NOTIFY, this function is not called (and it cannot be  
called, as there's no session which is required as a parameter).


In my case I can see that basically what  
sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness does is to remove the "<" , ">"  
around the route_uri.
I messed with the code in sofia_glue_send_notify to just remove "<"  
and ">" and after that I was able to receive the NOTIFY.
So I believe there is  some code lacking in FS to properly permit  
UAs registering via proxy to receive NOTIFY.
I might be wrong: if there is anyone using this scenario  
successfully, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll open a ticket on  
JIRA.


regards,
takeshi



___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-11 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael Jerris  wrote:

> Following up, did a bug get created for this issue?
>

Hello,
yes.
http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODSOFIA-26


>
> On Sep 5, 2009, at 2:40 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips).
>>> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and
>>> calls work perfectly.
>>> However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS
>>> without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIFY containing
>>> Message-Waiting information. But when I register via proxy, FS doesn't send
>>> this NOTIFY.
>>> What could be causing this difference of behavior? (enabling debug (F8)
>>> doesn't show anything for registration handling).
>>>
>>
>> I have enabled Sofia debug and I can see NTA is complaining about invalid
>> URI when building the NOTIFY:
>>
>> nua: nua_notify: entering
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): sent signal r_notify
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): recv signal r_notify
>> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): adding notify usage with event message-summary
>> nta_leg_tcreate(0x9b74c68)
>> nta outgoing create: invalid URI
>> nta: outgoing_free(0x9b74928)
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): event r_notify 900 Internal error at nua_client.c:711
>> nua(0x9b3c1e8): removing notify usage with event message-summary
>>
>> My REGISTER relayed by opensips is this:
>>
>> REGISTER sip:test.com SIP/2.0
>> Record-Route: <
>> sip:192.168.2.100;lr=on;ftag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5>
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.100;branch=z9hG4bKe62c.49e9f6c1.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.121:5060
>> ;received=192.168.2.121;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj4uAYgDuRbilYy4lCWcjlDKIDAtf-9RdS
>> Max-Forwards: 69
>> From: 
>> >;tag=AhFSdiltk3H4mrmGXICgRHFiU59ZuCk5
>> To: >
>> Call-ID: JvQ.apMLiJtfHa7z4ShIfgBPi5jIbtBv
>> CSeq: 14872 REGISTER
>> Contact: 
>> Expires: 60
>> Authorization: Digest username="user1", realm="test.com",
>> nonce="7d911eef-2c16-4deb-99f6-afcff9968a19", uri="sip:192.168.2.100",
>> response="df29caeb78790b4527f1176622cbf192", algorithm=MD5,
>> cnonce="5.EXCbM3RZTx6iOh1cvUzUvEZTs2eheG", qop=auth, nc=0001
>> Content-Length:  0
>> Path: 
>> ;lr;received=sip:192.168.2.121:5060>
>>
>> I hope someone can point out a problem.
>> I'm looking at NTA with gdb but I'm slow on this.
>
>
> The invalid URI nta is complaining about is the route_uri extracted from
> the Contact stored upon registration.
> The difference of behavior between INVITE (works) and NOTIFY (doesn't work)
> via proxy, seems to be because for INVITE, mod_sofia code (function
> sofia_glue_do_invite in sofia_glue.c) calls sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
> to adjust the route_uri.
> But for a NOTIFY, this function is not called (and it cannot be called, as
> there's no session which is required as a parameter).
>
> In my case I can see that basically what sofia_overcome_sip_uri_weakness
> does is to remove the "<" , ">" around the route_uri.
> I messed with the code in sofia_glue_send_notify to just remove "<" and ">"
> and after that I was able to receive the NOTIFY.
> So I believe there is  some code lacking in FS to properly permit UAs
> registering via proxy to receive NOTIFY.
> I might be wrong: if there is anyone using this scenario successfully,
> please let me know. Otherwise, I'll open a ticket on JIRA.
>
> regards,
> takeshi
>
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-15 Thread mayamatakeshi 
On 9/12/09, mayamatakeshi  wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael Jerris  wrote:
>
>> Following up, did a bug get created for this issue?
>>
>
> Hello,
> yes.
> http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODSOFIA-26
>

Just to simplify things in case someone searches the list:
Issue was solved on rev 14851.
Thank you all.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-24 Thread Peter P GMX 
Hello,

I have a similar problem with Freeswitch behind OpenSIPS as a load balancer:
When registering, Freeeswitch does not send a MWI NOTIFY message for a
Phone which has voicemails. Even after recording a new voicemail there
is no NOTIFY message sent. And there are no error messages on the console.

I have explicitely set
 in the internal profile.

When a phone is set up I get the following
Snom Phone REGISTER => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
Freeswitch OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone

Snom Phone SUBSCRIBE => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
Freeswitch 202 Accepted => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
   
Snom Phone PUBLISH => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
Freeswitch 200 OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
So presence generally seems to work.

But ngrepping the Network traffic there's no MWI NOTIFY message coming
from Freeswitch to any phone.
FreeSWITCH Version is 1.0.trunk (15648), so the patch discussed before
should be already there.

Any idea how to force the NOTIFY messages?


Best regards
Peter

Here's the debug Level9 output for nta and nua when a phone with VMs
registers, seems like there is no error in it:

freeswi...@sip11.mydomain.com> nta: received REGISTER
sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nua: nh_create: entering
nua: nh_create_handle: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): event i_register 100 Trying
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nua: nua_respond: entering
nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_respond
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_destroy
nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (7)
nta: timer set to 32000 ms
nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_destroy
nta_leg_destroy((nil))
nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 6)
nta: REGISTER (6) going to a default leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nua: nh_create: entering
nua: nh_create_handle: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x905a80): event i_register 100 Trying
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nua: nua_respond: entering
nua(0x905a80): sent signal r_respond
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua(0x905a80): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
nua(0x905a80): sent signal r_destroy
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (6)
nua(0x905a80): recv signal r_destroy
nta_leg_destroy((nil))
nta: received PUBLISH sip:1...@sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 3)
nta: PUBLISH (3) going to a default leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nua: nh_create: entering
nua: nh_create_handle: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x905f10): event i_publish 100 Trying
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nua: nua_respond: entering
nua(0x905f10): sent signal r_respond
nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua(0x905f10): recv signal r_respond 200 OK
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x905f10): sent signal r_destroy
nta: sent 200 OK for PUBLISH (3)
nua(0x905f10): recv signal r_destroy
nta_leg_destroy((nil))
nta: received SUBSCRIBE sip:mod_so...@192.168.178.200:5062 SIP/2.0 (CSeq 2)
nta: canonizing sip:mod_so...@192.168.178.200:5062 with contact
nta: SUBSCRIBE (2) going to existing leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nta: sent 200 OK for SUBSCRIBE (2)
nua(0x905560): event i_subscribe 200 OK
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 8)
nta: REGISTER (8) going to a default leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nua: nh_create: entering
nua: nh_create_handle: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): event i_register 100 Trying
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nua: nua_respond: entering
nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): sent signal r_respond
nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): recv signal r_respond 200 OK
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): sent signal r_destroy
nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nta: sent 200 OK for REGISTER (8)
nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): recv signal r_destroy
nta_leg_destroy((nil))
nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
nua: nh_create: entering
nua: nh_create_handle: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x8fc3d0): event i_register 100 Trying
nua: nua_application_event: entering
nua: nua_respond: entering
nua(0x8fc3d0): sent signal r_respond
nua(0x8fc3d0): recv signal r_respond 200 OK
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
nua(0x8fc3d0): sent signal r_destroy
nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
nta: sent 200 OK for REGISTER (7)
nua(0x8fc3d0): recv signal r_d

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-24 Thread Anthony Minessale 
connect to FS with fs_cli

Issue the command:

/events MESSAGE_QUERY MESSAGE_WAITING

then leave some voice mails

probably you have a mis-configuration where the user/domain/profile cannot
be resolved to the correct
sofia profile to send the notify

The event starts out as a freeswitch event and is translated into the notify
by mod_sofia but only if it can
match the event to a real sip user




On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Peter P GMX  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a similar problem with Freeswitch behind OpenSIPS as a load
> balancer:
> When registering, Freeeswitch does not send a MWI NOTIFY message for a
> Phone which has voicemails. Even after recording a new voicemail there
> is no NOTIFY message sent. And there are no error messages on the console.
>
> I have explicitely set
> in the internal profile.
>
> When a phone is set up I get the following
>Snom Phone REGISTER => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>
>Snom Phone SUBSCRIBE => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch 202 Accepted => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>
>Snom Phone PUBLISH => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch 200 OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
> So presence generally seems to work.
>
> But ngrepping the Network traffic there's no MWI NOTIFY message coming
> from Freeswitch to any phone.
> FreeSWITCH Version is 1.0.trunk (15648), so the patch discussed before
> should be already there.
>
> Any idea how to force the NOTIFY messages?
>
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> Here's the debug Level9 output for nta and nua when a phone with VMs
> registers, seems like there is no error in it:
>
> freeswi...@sip11.mydomain.com> nta: received REGISTER
> sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
> nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): event i_register 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_respond
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_destroy
> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (7)
> nta: timer set to 32000 ms
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_destroy
> nta_leg_destroy((nil))
> nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 6)
> nta: REGISTER (6) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x905a80): event i_register 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x905a80): sent signal r_respond
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x905a80): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
> nua(0x905a80): sent signal r_destroy
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (6)
> nua(0x905a80): recv signal r_destroy
> nta_leg_destroy((nil))
> nta: received PUBLISH 
> sip:1...@sip1.mydomain.comSIP/2.0 (CSeq 3)
> nta: PUBLISH (3) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x905f10): event i_publish 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x905f10): sent signal r_respond
> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x905f10): recv signal r_respond 200 OK
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x905f10): sent signal r_destroy
> nta: sent 200 OK for PUBLISH (3)
> nua(0x905f10): recv signal r_destroy
> nta_leg_destroy((nil))
> nta: received SUBSCRIBE sip:mod_so...@192.168.178.200:5062 SIP/2.0 (CSeq
> 2)
> nta: canonizing sip:mod_so...@192.168.178.200:5062 with contact
> nta: SUBSCRIBE (2) going to existing leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nta: sent 200 OK for SUBSCRIBE (2)
> nua(0x905560): event i_subscribe 200 OK
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com SIP/2.0 (CSeq 8)
> nta: REGISTER (8) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): event i_register 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): sent signal r_respond
> nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): recv signal r_respond 200 OK
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): sent signal r_destroy
> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nta: sent 200 OK for REGISTER (8)
> nua(0x7fd5dc073ba0): recv signal r_destroy
> nta_leg_d

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-24 Thread Peter P GMX 
Anthony, thanks for the hint,

I receive events like the following
RECV EVENT
Event-Name: MESSAGE_WAITING
Core-UUID: e71632c8-d948-11de-942b-0138c6269e37
FreeSWITCH-Hostname: sip11.mydomain.com
FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.178.200
FreeSWITCH-IPv6: ::1
Event-Date-Local: 2009-11-24 23:33:13
Event-Date-GMT: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:33:13 GMT
Event-Date-Timestamp: 1259101993918617
Event-Calling-File: mod_voicemail.c
Event-Calling-Function: update_mwi
Event-Calling-Line-Number: 1738
MWI-Messages-Waiting: yes
MWI-Message-Account: 2...@sip1.mydomain.com
MWI-Voice-Message: 4/1 (0/0)

I think the problem may be the Freeswitch cluster we are working with.
All phones register with realm (e.g. 2...@sip1.mydomain.com). The FS
hostname is sip11.mydomain.com resp. sip12.mydomain.com on the other host.
With xml_curl we ensure that for both domain names a directory entry is
passed back. That way it works nicely with registering phones, receiving
voicemails, recording voicemails etc. but not for MWI. For recording and
querying voicemails we use the realm instead of the domain name and that
way it works.

When a voicemail has finished recording - and at the time the above
message occurs - I see 2 directory xml_curl requests with
Event-Calling-File=mod_voicemail.c&Event-Calling-Function=resolve_id
One I expect is for retrieving the MWI data and the other one for
sending the VM email (which is sucessfully sent).

Any hint how we can workaround this? Or is there a parameter to tell
mod_voicemail that is should use the realm instead of the local hostname
for sending MWI?

Best regards
Peter

Anthony Minessale schrieb:
> connect to FS with fs_cli
>
> Issue the command:
>
> /events MESSAGE_QUERY MESSAGE_WAITING
>
> then leave some voice mails
>
> probably you have a mis-configuration where the user/domain/profile
> cannot be resolved to the correct
> sofia profile to send the notify
>
> The event starts out as a freeswitch event and is translated into the
> notify by mod_sofia but only if it can
> match the event to a real sip user
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Peter P GMX  > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a similar problem with Freeswitch behind OpenSIPS as a load
> balancer:
> When registering, Freeeswitch does not send a MWI NOTIFY message for a
> Phone which has voicemails. Even after recording a new voicemail there
> is no NOTIFY message sent. And there are no error messages on the
> console.
>
> I have explicitely set
> in the internal
> profile.
>
> When a phone is set up I get the following
>Snom Phone REGISTER => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>
>Snom Phone SUBSCRIBE => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch 202 Accepted => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>
>Snom Phone PUBLISH => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>Freeswitch 200 OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
> So presence generally seems to work.
>
> But ngrepping the Network traffic there's no MWI NOTIFY message coming
> from Freeswitch to any phone.
> FreeSWITCH Version is 1.0.trunk (15648), so the patch discussed before
> should be already there.
>
> Any idea how to force the NOTIFY messages?
>
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> Here's the debug Level9 output for nta and nua when a phone with VMs
> registers, seems like there is no error in it:
>
> freeswi...@sip11.mydomain.com
> > nta: received REGISTER
> sip:sip1.mydomain.com  SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
> nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): event i_register 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_respond
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_destroy
> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (7)
> nta: timer set to 32000 ms
> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_destroy
> nta_leg_destroy((nil))
> nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com
>  SIP/2.0 (CSeq 6)
> nta: REGISTER (6) going to a default leg
> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua: nh_create: entering
> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> nua(0x905a80): event i_register 100 Trying
> nua: nua_application_event: entering
> nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua(0x905a80): sent signal r_respond
> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua(0x905a80): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
> nua(0x905a80): se

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-25 Thread Juliano - Terra 
Peter,

I had a similar problem, the way I found to make it work was setting the 
mailbox ID in the phone to match the FS domain/hostname.

For instance using a Linksys SPA962, I set the "Voice Mail Server" in 
the extension tab to extens...@domain using FS hostname as the domain.

Regards,

Juliano


Peter P GMX escreveu:
> Anthony, thanks for the hint,
>
> I receive events like the following
> RECV EVENT
> Event-Name: MESSAGE_WAITING
> Core-UUID: e71632c8-d948-11de-942b-0138c6269e37
> FreeSWITCH-Hostname: sip11.mydomain.com
> FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.178.200
> FreeSWITCH-IPv6: ::1
> Event-Date-Local: 2009-11-24 23:33:13
> Event-Date-GMT: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:33:13 GMT
> Event-Date-Timestamp: 1259101993918617
> Event-Calling-File: mod_voicemail.c
> Event-Calling-Function: update_mwi
> Event-Calling-Line-Number: 1738
> MWI-Messages-Waiting: yes
> MWI-Message-Account: 2...@sip1.mydomain.com
> MWI-Voice-Message: 4/1 (0/0)
>
> I think the problem may be the Freeswitch cluster we are working with.
> All phones register with realm (e.g. 2...@sip1.mydomain.com). The FS
> hostname is sip11.mydomain.com resp. sip12.mydomain.com on the other host.
> With xml_curl we ensure that for both domain names a directory entry is
> passed back. That way it works nicely with registering phones, receiving
> voicemails, recording voicemails etc. but not for MWI. For recording and
> querying voicemails we use the realm instead of the domain name and that
> way it works.
>
> When a voicemail has finished recording - and at the time the above
> message occurs - I see 2 directory xml_curl requests with
> Event-Calling-File=mod_voicemail.c&Event-Calling-Function=resolve_id
> One I expect is for retrieving the MWI data and the other one for
> sending the VM email (which is sucessfully sent).
>
> Any hint how we can workaround this? Or is there a parameter to tell
> mod_voicemail that is should use the realm instead of the local hostname
> for sending MWI?
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> Anthony Minessale schrieb:
>   
>> connect to FS with fs_cli
>>
>> Issue the command:
>>
>> /events MESSAGE_QUERY MESSAGE_WAITING
>>
>> then leave some voice mails
>>
>> probably you have a mis-configuration where the user/domain/profile
>> cannot be resolved to the correct
>> sofia profile to send the notify
>>
>> The event starts out as a freeswitch event and is translated into the
>> notify by mod_sofia but only if it can
>> match the event to a real sip user
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Peter P GMX > > wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a similar problem with Freeswitch behind OpenSIPS as a load
>> balancer:
>> When registering, Freeeswitch does not send a MWI NOTIFY message for a
>> Phone which has voicemails. Even after recording a new voicemail there
>> is no NOTIFY message sent. And there are no error messages on the
>> console.
>>
>> I have explicitely set
>> in the internal
>> profile.
>>
>> When a phone is set up I get the following
>>Snom Phone REGISTER => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>Freeswitch OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>>
>>Snom Phone SUBSCRIBE => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>Freeswitch 202 Accepted => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>>
>>Snom Phone PUBLISH => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>Freeswitch 200 OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>> So presence generally seems to work.
>>
>> But ngrepping the Network traffic there's no MWI NOTIFY message coming
>> from Freeswitch to any phone.
>> FreeSWITCH Version is 1.0.trunk (15648), so the patch discussed before
>> should be already there.
>>
>> Any idea how to force the NOTIFY messages?
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Peter
>>
>> Here's the debug Level9 output for nta and nua when a phone with VMs
>> registers, seems like there is no error in it:
>>
>> freeswi...@sip11.mydomain.com
>> > nta: received REGISTER
>> sip:sip1.mydomain.com  SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
>> nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
>> nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
>> nua: nh_create: entering
>> nua: nh_create_handle: entering
>> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): event i_register 100 Trying
>> nua: nua_application_event: entering
>> nua: nua_respond: entering
>> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_respond
>> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
>> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_destroy
>> nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
>> nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
>> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
>> nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>> nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (7)
>> nta: timer set to 32000 ms
>> nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_destroy
>> nta_leg_destroy((nil))
>> nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com
>>  SIP/2.0 (CSeq 6)
>>

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-25 Thread Michael Jerris 
Try an alias on the sip profile.

Mike

On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Peter P GMX wrote:

> Anthony, thanks for the hint,
> 
> I receive events like the following
> RECV EVENT
> Event-Name: MESSAGE_WAITING
> Core-UUID: e71632c8-d948-11de-942b-0138c6269e37
> FreeSWITCH-Hostname: sip11.mydomain.com
> FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.178.200
> FreeSWITCH-IPv6: ::1
> Event-Date-Local: 2009-11-24 23:33:13
> Event-Date-GMT: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:33:13 GMT
> Event-Date-Timestamp: 1259101993918617
> Event-Calling-File: mod_voicemail.c
> Event-Calling-Function: update_mwi
> Event-Calling-Line-Number: 1738
> MWI-Messages-Waiting: yes
> MWI-Message-Account: 2...@sip1.mydomain.com
> MWI-Voice-Message: 4/1 (0/0)
> 
> I think the problem may be the Freeswitch cluster we are working with.
> All phones register with realm (e.g. 2...@sip1.mydomain.com). The FS
> hostname is sip11.mydomain.com resp. sip12.mydomain.com on the other host.
> With xml_curl we ensure that for both domain names a directory entry is
> passed back. That way it works nicely with registering phones, receiving
> voicemails, recording voicemails etc. but not for MWI. For recording and
> querying voicemails we use the realm instead of the domain name and that
> way it works.
> 
> When a voicemail has finished recording - and at the time the above
> message occurs - I see 2 directory xml_curl requests with
> Event-Calling-File=mod_voicemail.c&Event-Calling-Function=resolve_id
> One I expect is for retrieving the MWI data and the other one for
> sending the VM email (which is sucessfully sent).
> 
> Any hint how we can workaround this? Or is there a parameter to tell
> mod_voicemail that is should use the realm instead of the local hostname
> for sending MWI?
> 
> Best regards
> Peter
> 
> Anthony Minessale schrieb:
>> connect to FS with fs_cli
>> 
>> Issue the command:
>> 
>> /events MESSAGE_QUERY MESSAGE_WAITING
>> 
>> then leave some voice mails
>> 
>> probably you have a mis-configuration where the user/domain/profile
>> cannot be resolved to the correct
>> sofia profile to send the notify
>> 
>> The event starts out as a freeswitch event and is translated into the
>> notify by mod_sofia but only if it can
>> match the event to a real sip user
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Peter P GMX > > wrote:
>> 
>>Hello,
>> 
>>I have a similar problem with Freeswitch behind OpenSIPS as a load
>>balancer:
>>When registering, Freeeswitch does not send a MWI NOTIFY message for a
>>Phone which has voicemails. Even after recording a new voicemail there
>>is no NOTIFY message sent. And there are no error messages on the
>>console.
>> 
>>I have explicitely set
>>in the internal
>>profile.
>> 
>>When a phone is set up I get the following
>>   Snom Phone REGISTER => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>   Freeswitch OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>> 
>>   Snom Phone SUBSCRIBE => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>   Freeswitch 202 Accepted => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>> 
>>   Snom Phone PUBLISH => OpenSIPS=> Freeswitch
>>   Freeswitch 200 OK => OpenSIPS=>Snom Phone
>>So presence generally seems to work.
>> 
>>But ngrepping the Network traffic there's no MWI NOTIFY message coming
>>from Freeswitch to any phone.
>>FreeSWITCH Version is 1.0.trunk (15648), so the patch discussed before
>>should be already there.
>> 
>>Any idea how to force the NOTIFY messages?
>> 
>> 
>>Best regards
>>Peter
>> 
>>Here's the debug Level9 output for nta and nua when a phone with VMs
>>registers, seems like there is no error in it:
>> 
>>freeswi...@sip11.mydomain.com
>>> nta: received REGISTER
>>sip:sip1.mydomain.com  SIP/2.0 (CSeq 7)
>>nta: REGISTER (7) going to a default leg
>>nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
>>nua: nh_create: entering
>>nua: nh_create_handle: entering
>>nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>>nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): event i_register 100 Trying
>>nua: nua_application_event: entering
>>nua: nua_respond: entering
>>nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_respond
>>nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
>>nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): sent signal r_destroy
>>nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
>>nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
>>nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_respond 401 Unauthorized
>>nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>>nta: sent 401 Unauthorized for REGISTER (7)
>>nta: timer set to 32000 ms
>>nua(0x7fd5d409c8f0): recv signal r_destroy
>>nta_leg_destroy((nil))
>>nta: received REGISTER sip:sip1.mydomain.com
>> SIP/2.0 (CSeq 6)
>>nta: REGISTER (6) going to a default leg
>>nua: nua_stack_process_request: entering
>>nua: nh_create: entering
>>nua: nh_create_handle: entering
>>nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
>>nua(0x905a80): event i_register 100 Trying
>>nua: nua_

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-25 Thread Brian West 
Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on the profile  
so it can find it.

/b

On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:

> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>
> Mike


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-26 Thread Peter P GMX 
I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch (without an
OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the behaviour is as
before:
No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor after a
voicemail is recorded.

Best regards
Peter
Brian West schrieb:
> Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on the profile  
> so it can find it.
>
> /b
>
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
>
>   
>> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>>
>> Mike
>> 
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>   

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-27 Thread Anthony Minessale 
Did you check the 2 replies that told you you need aliases in your sofia
profile to translate the domain found in your message_waiting to the right
profile?  Both Brian and Mike answered you.




On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Peter P GMX  wrote:

> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch (without an
> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the behaviour is as
> before:
> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor after a
> voicemail is recorded.
>
> Best regards
> Peter
> Brian West schrieb:
> > Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on the profile
> > so it can find it.
> >
> > /b
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Try an alias on the sip profile.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com 
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org 
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-27 Thread Michael Jerris 
Does the alias you added match the one that you saw in the event?  The alias is 
100% for sure the fix for this issue, please check again.

Mike

On Nov 26, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Peter P GMX wrote:

> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch (without an
> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the behaviour is as
> before:
> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor after a
> voicemail is recorded.
> 
> Best regards
> Peter
> Brian West schrieb:
>> Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on the profile  
>> so it can find it.
>> 
>> /b
>> 
>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-11-27 Thread Anthony Minessale 
based on your example past

sip1.mydomain.com is the domain in the packet and thus the profile should
have an alias for this.
Then the user must reside in your sip db with the user 200 and domain
sip1.mydomain.com

if you dont have this consider the force-register-domain and
force-register-db-domain to normalize the host names.


On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Anthony Minessale <
anthony.miness...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Did you check the 2 replies that told you you need aliases in your sofia
> profile to translate the domain found in your message_waiting to the right
> profile?  Both Brian and Mike answered you.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Peter P GMX wrote:
>
>> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch (without an
>> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the behaviour is as
>> before:
>> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor after a
>> voicemail is recorded.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Peter
>> Brian West schrieb:
>> > Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on the profile
>> > so it can find it.
>> >
>> > /b
>> >
>> > On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com 
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org 
> iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
> googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
> pstn:213-799-1400
>



-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com 
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org 
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-12-05 Thread Peter P GMX 
Hello Anthony,

I did some checks today
Here is how the phones are registered:

mysql> select sip_host, presence_hosts, server_user,server_host,
hostname, sip_realm, mwi_user,mwi_host from sip_registrations limit 1;
+---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
| sip_host  | presence_hosts| server_user | server_host |
hostname   | sip_realm | mwi_user | mwi_host  |
+---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
| sip1.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136 | 10.11.12.2  |
sip11.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136  | sip1.mydomain.com |
+---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
IPs are:
10.11.12.1 sip1.mydomain.com (common cluster IP)
10.11.12.2 sip11.mydomain.com
10.11.12.3 sip12.mydomain.com (not used at this point)

XML-Curl for the directory is:

























The internal profile has the following alias:






With $${domain} being sip11.mydomain.com

Phones are registering to sip1.mydomain.com, Voicemail works, but MWI
does not. Any hint what I should change to make this work?

Best regards
Peter

Anthony Minessale schrieb:
> based on your example past
>
> sip1.mydomain.com  is the domain in the
> packet and thus the profile should have an alias for this.
> Then the user must reside in your sip db with the user 200 and domain
> sip1.mydomain.com 
>
> if you dont have this consider the force-register-domain and
> force-register-db-domain to normalize the host names.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Anthony Minessale
> mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Did you check the 2 replies that told you you need aliases in your
> sofia profile to translate the domain found in your
> message_waiting to the right profile?  Both Brian and Mike
> answered you.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Peter P GMX
> mailto:prometheus...@gmx.net>> wrote:
>
> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch
> (without an
> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the
> behaviour is as
> before:
> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor
> after a
> voicemail is recorded.
>
> Best regards
> Peter
> Brian West schrieb:
> > Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on
> the profile
> > so it can find it.
> >
> > /b
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Try an alias on the sip profile.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> 
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >
> 
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> 
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> 
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com
> 
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
> 
> IRC: irc.freenode.net  #freeswitch
>
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org
> 
> iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
> 
> googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
> 
> pstn:213-799-1400
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com
> 
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
>

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-12-07 Thread Peter P GMX 
Hello,

i now changed the $${domain} name of the server to the domain name the
phones register with.
Now messaging (MWI, notify) works.

Best regards
Peter

Peter P GMX schrieb:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> I did some checks today
> Here is how the phones are registered:
>
> mysql> select sip_host, presence_hosts, server_user,server_host,
> hostname, sip_realm, mwi_user,mwi_host from sip_registrations limit 1;
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> | sip_host  | presence_hosts| server_user | server_host |
> hostname   | sip_realm | mwi_user | mwi_host  |
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> | sip1.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136 | 10.11.12.2  |
> sip11.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136  | sip1.mydomain.com |
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> IPs are:
> 10.11.12.1 sip1.mydomain.com (common cluster IP)
> 10.11.12.2 sip11.mydomain.com
> 10.11.12.3 sip12.mydomain.com (not used at this point)
>
> XML-Curl for the directory is:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  value="{presence_id=${dialed_us...@${dialed_domain},transfer_fallback_extension=${dialed_user}}${sofia_contact(${dialed_us...@${dialed_domain})}"/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> The internal profile has the following alias:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> With $${domain} being sip11.mydomain.com
>
> Phones are registering to sip1.mydomain.com, Voicemail works, but MWI
> does not. Any hint what I should change to make this work?
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> Anthony Minessale schrieb:
>   
>> based on your example past
>>
>> sip1.mydomain.com  is the domain in the
>> packet and thus the profile should have an alias for this.
>> Then the user must reside in your sip db with the user 200 and domain
>> sip1.mydomain.com 
>>
>> if you dont have this consider the force-register-domain and
>> force-register-db-domain to normalize the host names.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Anthony Minessale
>> mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Did you check the 2 replies that told you you need aliases in your
>> sofia profile to translate the domain found in your
>> message_waiting to the right profile?  Both Brian and Mike
>> answered you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Peter P GMX
>> mailto:prometheus...@gmx.net>> wrote:
>>
>> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch
>> (without an
>> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the
>> behaviour is as
>> before:
>> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor
>> after a
>> voicemail is recorded.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Peter
>> Brian West schrieb:
>> > Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on
>> the profile
>> > so it can find it.
>> >
>> > /b
>> >
>> > On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> >
>> 
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> 
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Anthony Minessale II
>>
>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>>
>> AIM: anthm
>> MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com
>> 
>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
>> 
>> IRC: irc.freenode.net  #freeswitch
>>
>>
>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
>> sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-12-07 Thread Peter P GMX 
Hello,

i now changed the $${domain} of the server to the domain name the
phones register with.
Now messaging (MWI, notify) works. Thanks to all for your support.

Best regards
Peter

Peter P GMX schrieb:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> I did some checks today
> Here is how the phones are registered:
>
> mysql> select sip_host, presence_hosts, server_user,server_host,
> hostname, sip_realm, mwi_user,mwi_host from sip_registrations limit 1;
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> | sip_host  | presence_hosts| server_user | server_host |
> hostname   | sip_realm | mwi_user | mwi_host  |
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> | sip1.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136 | 10.11.12.2  |
> sip11.mydomain.com | sip1.mydomain.com | 136  | sip1.mydomain.com |
> +---+---+-+-++---+--+---+
> IPs are:
> 10.11.12.1 sip1.mydomain.com (common cluster IP)
> 10.11.12.2 sip11.mydomain.com
> 10.11.12.3 sip12.mydomain.com (not used at this point)
>
> XML-Curl for the directory is:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  value="{presence_id=${dialed_us...@${dialed_domain},transfer_fallback_extension=${dialed_user}}${sofia_contact(${dialed_us...@${dialed_domain})}"/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> The internal profile has the following alias:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> With $${domain} being sip11.mydomain.com
>
> Phones are registering to sip1.mydomain.com, Voicemail works, but MWI
> does not. Any hint what I should change to make this work?
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> Anthony Minessale schrieb:
>   
>> based on your example past
>>
>> sip1.mydomain.com  is the domain in the
>> packet and thus the profile should have an alias for this.
>> Then the user must reside in your sip db with the user 200 and domain
>> sip1.mydomain.com 
>>
>> if you dont have this consider the force-register-domain and
>> force-register-db-domain to normalize the host names.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Anthony Minessale
>> mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Did you check the 2 replies that told you you need aliases in your
>> sofia profile to translate the domain found in your
>> message_waiting to the right profile?  Both Brian and Mike
>> answered you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Peter P GMX
>> mailto:prometheus...@gmx.net>> wrote:
>>
>> I tried now with phones directly attached to the freeswitch
>> (without an
>> OpenSIPS in between). I also added the alias. But the
>> behaviour is as
>> before:
>> No notify message from freeswitch, neither after register nor
>> after a
>> voicemail is recorded.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Peter
>> Brian West schrieb:
>> > Yes an alias will be required for every domain you run on
>> the profile
>> > so it can find it.
>> >
>> > /b
>> >
>> > On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Try an alias on the sip profile.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> >
>> 
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> 
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Anthony Minessale II
>>
>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>>
>> AIM: anthm
>> MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com
>> 
>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
>> 
>> IRC: irc.freenode.net  #freeswitch
>>
>>
>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
>> sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org
>> 
>> iax:g