Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but atthesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime
Yup, my mistake, got the wrong end of the stick. However while we're on the subject of show channels, is it possible to get a formatted response back from the event socket? It would be nice to interrogate an event style response. Perhaps even including some other goodies such as load etc. Regards, From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 16 March 2009 00:16 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but atthesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime Perhaps a misunderstanding? We do not suffer from any problem at all regarding show channels. The reason for the link was to demonstrate the issue we are familiar with from our asterisk days (3-4 years ago) and to help explain how we solved it by storing the calls states in a separate table to avoid locking the channels. You can type show channel in FS all you want and all you are doing is selecting from the SQLite db. The Original question by the poster was if we can find a way to turn off SQL and still allow show channels to work and the answer is, sorry no. On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nik Middleton nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote: To be fair, most of these messages are 4-5 years old. That said to date, I can crash * by repeatedly doing a 'show channels'. All the same FS should be robust enough to suffer this abuse. If it's not,. the issue needs to be investigated. Regards, From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 15 March 2009 13:30 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but at thesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime search google for bugs related to crash and show channels http://www.google.com/search?q=asterisk+crash+show+channelsie=utf-8oe= utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-a On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote: So how Asterisk does that show channels without SQL? I don't think they use SQLite internally. Just being curious. Diego On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com wrote: To clarify, -nosql turns on and off only the collecting of data for the show commands, and can now handle higher load than the sip stack can. The only thing your doing by saying -nosql is turning off the exact functionality you say you want. Its similar to saying I would like to support sip but don't want to load mod_sofia. There should be no reasons to use that command anymore, if you encounter any I would be interested in knowing what is going on. Mike On Mar 14, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Diego Viola wrote: Yeah, but still, it would be nice to see the channels with -nosql :) I don't want to be a pain in the ass, just giving some user feedback. Regards, Diego On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Brian West br...@freeswitch.org wrote: Since we added indexes to the SQLite DB its not so bad. /b On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Diego Viola wrote: Oh, I thought that SQLite wasn't that great on performance and that people wanted to replace/remove it from the core. On of the most interesting things about FreeSWITCH to me has been the fact that most data in the system such as registrations are kept in a SQL database. The default installation uses SQLite internally though you can easily point FreeSWITCH at one of a number of other SQL servers such as PostgreSQL or MySQL via UnixODBC. Sadly, SQLite has become somewhat of a bottleneck in the core so future versions of FreeSWITCH will use less of it. For example, doing a show channels with over 500 channels in use starts to show issues. While I'm sad to see SQLite go in these cases, I am anxious to see how Minessale replaces it. http://www.anders.com/cms/275/FreeSWITCH/ClueCon/Anthony.Minessale I was just being curious about it :-) Regards, Diego ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com mailto:msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but atthesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime
Depending on the API you're calling, of course show channels as xml show calls as xml uuid_dump [uuid] xml sofia xmlstatus and probably more than that. Math On 16-Mar-09, at 7:52 AM, Nik Middleton wrote: Yup, my mistake, got the wrong end of the stick. However while we’re on the subject of show channels, is it possible to get a formatted response back from the event socket? It would be nice to interrogate an event style response. Perhaps even including some other goodies such as load etc. Regards, From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org ] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 16 March 2009 00:16 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but atthesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime Perhaps a misunderstanding? We do not suffer from any problem at all regarding show channels. The reason for the link was to demonstrate the issue we are familiar with from our asterisk days (3-4 years ago) and to help explain how we solved it by storing the calls states in a separate table to avoid locking the channels. You can type show channel in FS all you want and all you are doing is selecting from the SQLite db. The Original question by the poster was if we can find a way to turn off SQL and still allow show channels to work and the answer is, sorry no. On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nik Middleton nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote: To be fair, most of these messages are 4-5 years old. That said to date, I can crash * by repeatedly doing a ‘show channels’. All the same FS should be robust enough to suffer this abuse. If it’s not,. the issue needs to be investigated. Regards, From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org ] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 15 March 2009 13:30 To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Start FreeSWITCH without any SQL but at thesame time have all info available on realtime/runtime search google for bugs related to crash and show channels http://www.google.com/search?q=asterisk+crash+show+channelsie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-a On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Diego Viola diego.vi...@gmail.com wrote: So how Asterisk does that show channels without SQL? I don't think they use SQLite internally. Just being curious. Diego On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Michael Jerris m...@jerris.com wrote: To clarify, -nosql turns on and off only the collecting of data for the show commands, and can now handle higher load than the sip stack can. The only thing your doing by saying -nosql is turning off the exact functionality you say you want. Its similar to saying I would like to support sip but don't want to load mod_sofia. There should be no reasons to use that command anymore, if you encounter any I would be interested in knowing what is going on. Mike On Mar 14, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Diego Viola wrote: Yeah, but still, it would be nice to see the channels with - nosql :) I don't want to be a pain in the ass, just giving some user feedback. Regards, Diego On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Brian West br...@freeswitch.org wrote: Since we added indexes to the SQLite DB its not so bad. /b On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Diego Viola wrote: Oh, I thought that SQLite wasn't that great on performance and that people wanted to replace/remove it from the core. On of the most interesting things about FreeSWITCH to me has been the fact that most data in the system such as registrations are kept in a SQL database. The default installation uses SQLite internally though you can easily point FreeSWITCH at one of a number of other SQL servers such as PostgreSQL or MySQL via UnixODBC. Sadly, SQLite has become somewhat of a bottleneck in the core so future versions of FreeSWITCH will use less of it. For example, doing a show channels with over 500 channels in use starts to show issues. While I'm sad to see SQLite go in these cases, I am anxious to see how Minessale replaces it. http://www.anders.com/cms/275/FreeSWITCH/ClueCon/Anthony.Minessale I was just being curious about it :-) Regards, Diego ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http
