Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged up with a long delay
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote:
Hello,
The issue is resolved. I feel stupid, because Michael Jerris was
right the first time. Setting external_rtp_ip and external_sip_ip to
$${local_ip_v4} made it work.
But the strange thing is: it SOMETIMES worked before without any
delay, which 'should not be possible', because the original IP was
my external ip and the BYE message was sent straight to it. And
there is no way it could reach the target 'internal' FS, because it
runs on virtual machine, and no ports are forwarded on my router.
Any thoughts? Why this could (rarely) work even with the previous
config?
Thanks to both of you for your answers.
MA
It could work at least in regards to rtp if you had something else on
the other side that adjusted to incorrect rtp ip like freeswitch does,
the bye probably never really worked.
Mike
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged up with a long delay
Hello,
The issue is resolved. I feel stupid, because Michael Jerris was right the
first time. Setting external_rtp_ip and external_sip_ip to $${local_ip_v4} made
it work.
But the strange thing is: it SOMETIMES worked before without any delay, which
'should not be possible', because the original IP was my external ip and the
BYE message was sent straight to it. And there is no way it could reach the
target 'internal' FS, because it runs on virtual machine, and no ports are
forwarded on my router.
Any thoughts? Why this could (rarely) work even with the previous config?
Thanks to both of you for your answers.
MA
- Original Message -
From: mercutioviz (via Nabble)
To: Maciej Aniserowicz
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users
hanged up with a long delay
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz [hidden email] wrote:
Both of the instances are run on the same machine, i just changed the
default
ports they use. Can anything else cause this strange behavior?
MA
Did a packet capture yield any clues? That is, were you able to confirm that
each instance sent and received all the packets that you believe they should
have sent and received? The reason I ask is so that you don't end up chasing a
ghost because you made an assumption somewhere in your troubleshooting.
-MC
Â
Michael Jerris wrote:
Incorrect NAT configuration so one of the boxes is not actually
getting a BYE.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote:
Hi,
When I use two FreeSWITCH instances ('internal' and 'external'), all
users register to the 'external' instance which acts as a gateway by
'internal' instance (which in turn is controlled by my applicaiton
with commands sent by socket).
When user hangs up, the 'hanged up' event is propagated to the
'internal' instance after a long time (~3 minutes) instead of being
propagated immediately.
What can cause this issue?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/gateway-FS-informs-it-s-client-FS-about-users-hanged-up-with-a-long-delay-tp3768540p3787956.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
View message @
http://n2.nabble.com/gateway-FS-informs-it-s-client-FS-about-users-hanged-up-with-a-long-delay-tp3768540p3789469.html
To unsubscribe from Re: gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged
up with a long delay, click here.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/gateway-FS-informs-it-s-client-FS-about-users-hanged-up-with-a-long-delay-tp3768540p3795011.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged up with a long delay
Both of the instances are run on the same machine, i just changed the default
ports they use. Can anything else cause this strange behavior?
MA
Michael Jerris wrote:
Incorrect NAT configuration so one of the boxes is not actually
getting a BYE.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote:
Hi,
When I use two FreeSWITCH instances ('internal' and 'external'), all
users register to the 'external' instance which acts as a gateway by
'internal' instance (which in turn is controlled by my applicaiton
with commands sent by socket).
When user hangs up, the 'hanged up' event is propagated to the
'internal' instance after a long time (~3 minutes) instead of being
propagated immediately.
What can cause this issue?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/gateway-FS-informs-it-s-client-FS-about-users-hanged-up-with-a-long-delay-tp3768540p3787956.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged up with a long delay
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz
maciej.aniserow...@gmail.com wrote:
Both of the instances are run on the same machine, i just changed the
default
ports they use. Can anything else cause this strange behavior?
MA
Did a packet capture yield any clues? That is, were you able to confirm that
each instance sent and received all the packets that you believe they should
have sent and received? The reason I ask is so that you don't end up chasing
a ghost because you made an assumption somewhere in your troubleshooting.
-MC
Michael Jerris wrote:
Incorrect NAT configuration so one of the boxes is not actually
getting a BYE.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote:
Hi,
When I use two FreeSWITCH instances ('internal' and 'external'), all
users register to the 'external' instance which acts as a gateway by
'internal' instance (which in turn is controlled by my applicaiton
with commands sent by socket).
When user hangs up, the 'hanged up' event is propagated to the
'internal' instance after a long time (~3 minutes) instead of being
propagated immediately.
What can cause this issue?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/gateway-FS-informs-it-s-client-FS-about-users-hanged-up-with-a-long-delay-tp3768540p3787956.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] gateway FS informs it's client FS about users hanged up with a long delay
Incorrect NAT configuration so one of the boxes is not actually
getting a BYE.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Maciej Aniserowicz wrote:
Hi,
When I use two FreeSWITCH instances ('internal' and 'external'), all
users register to the 'external' instance which acts as a gateway by
'internal' instance (which in turn is controlled by my applicaiton
with commands sent by socket).
When user hangs up, the 'hanged up' event is propagated to the
'internal' instance after a long time (~3 minutes) instead of being
propagated immediately.
What can cause this issue?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
