Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12

2007-10-02 Thread mpsuzuki 
Hi,

On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I found that FreeType can not get the correct glyph index from the
 font Simsun-extb corroding the Unicode of the character.

Using version 0.90 of this font, I see no problems with `ftview -e
unic'.  However, this font version's `post' table is buggy; it misses
all indices 0x7FFF into the glyph name string array, thus FreeType
displays `.notdef' instead of the correct glyph name for Unicode
characters = U+27EFC.

Yet I've not checked the contents of post table,
but my experiment on version 5.00 (MD5 is following),
with freetype-2.3.5 is same with Werner.

417a85ff314928adc67e51bb1b458f04  simsunb.ttf

I could not reproduce the bug Ding Li reported.

Regards,
mpsuzuki


___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12

2007-10-02 Thread Masatake YAMATO 
 I could not reproduce the bug Ding Li reported.

How do you think using FT2_DEBUG if Ding Li kindly accepts recompile 
FT2 with defining FT_DEBUG_LEVEL_TRACE?

You can compare debug output of yours and Ding Li's.

Masatake YAMATO


___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel