Re: [ft-devel] stroker fixes
> Please find attached a major revision of ftstroke.c/h. Thanks a lot! I've committed it to the git repository, doing some slight formatting. Ideally, it would have been better to isolate the various unrelated fixes into separate commits, but I know that this can be a very time-consuming burden. So I ask everyone to test it! Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] stroker fixes - documentation
> I think only the documentation for FT_Stroker_LineJoin will need > updating to match the new ftstroker.h. > > Perhaps this happens automatically. It does, thanks. Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] ttfautohint: How to install
> What i have noticed with ttfautohint is that often e.g. a regular > weight of a font will grow in size at a bigger % than the bold > weight. So i'm thinking the Regular is 'over-hinted', maybe. Well, ttfautohint has no possibility to decide whether a font is bold or not... The Infinality patches, however, try to cater with such a situation, giving different thresholds for bold shapes. I haven't checked yet whether this harmonizes (in your sense) the appearance of regular and bold weights. If this works as expected I could add an option to ttfautohint to make it treat the font to be processed as bold. Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
