Re: [ft-devel] FreeType patches to support amalgamation
Yes. So far there are 6 sets of changes, using the naming conventions that you recommended. These patches were created off an unmodified copy of the publicly available FreeType 2.4.8. Unfortunately I'm using SVN but the patches should still be applicable (?) Thanks for the patches! I've committed them, with slight modifications. The next time please take care of the whitespace formatting, and please follow the structure of the ChangeLog entries more closely. Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] FreeType patches to support amalgamation #2
One more minor set of changes, I moved an inline comment to the previous line on a couple of #include lines. What is this change set good for, except cosmetics? Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] where might be a problem
Excuse me, I got Forbidden error to the URL. Could you add read permission to others? Regards, mpsuzuki pravin@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png Earlier i thought it might be some problem from font side but yesterday saw it on Windows and auto bold works perfectly fine. Can someone given me pointer that why might be wrong? Regards, Pravin Satpute ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] where might be a problem
2012/2/24 suzuki toshiya mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp Excuse me, I got Forbidden error to the URL. Could you add read permission to others? corrected now. Thanks, Pravin Satpute Regards, mpsuzuki pravin@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png Earlier i thought it might be some problem from font side but yesterday saw it on Windows and auto bold works perfectly fine. Can someone given me pointer that why might be wrong? Regards, Pravin Satpute ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] where might be a problem
Thanks, hmm, I agree with your pointing out that current auto bold synthesis does not work well for Lohit Devanagari. The horizontal strokes are disconnected, and the left half of the horizontal strokes are not flat. I will check, although yet I'm not familiar with auto bold synthesis code. Regards, mpsuzuki pravin@gmail.com wrote: 2012/2/24 suzuki toshiya mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp Excuse me, I got Forbidden error to the URL. Could you add read permission to others? corrected now. Thanks, Pravin Satpute Regards, mpsuzuki pravin@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png Earlier i thought it might be some problem from font side but yesterday saw it on Windows and auto bold works perfectly fine. Can someone given me pointer that why might be wrong? Regards, Pravin Satpute ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] where might be a problem
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 AM, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png Can someone given me pointer that why might be wrong? Which version of Freetype does that? Can you compare Freetype 2.4.5 and 2.4.8? A new stroker code by David Bevan was introduced in 2.4.6. ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] where might be a problem
Dear Alexei, Thank you for notice, the latest FreeType2 shows the problem. I will check if the previous stroker shows no problem. Regards, mpsuzuki Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 AM, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png Can someone given me pointer that why might be wrong? Which version of Freetype does that? Can you compare Freetype 2.4.5 and 2.4.8? A new stroker code by David Bevan was introduced in 2.4.6. ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
