Re: [ft-devel] controlling FreeType modules
Is this because we ran out of FT_LOAD_XXX space? We used to control Freetype with flags, now it is this API. Potentially this is more flexible Freetype3 material. Any plans for Freetype3? It's been 12 years. Is it time yet for a spring cleaning? ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] controlling FreeType modules
On 08/29/2012 09:58 AM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > Any plans for Freetype3? I'm been thinking about that... ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] controlling FreeType modules
> Is this because we ran out of FT_LOAD_XXX space? This is one of the reasons, yes. Another one is that controlling modules with FT_LOAD_XXX simply doesn't feel right, since modules belong to FT_Library objects and not to FT_Face. > Any plans for Freetype3? It's been 12 years. Is it time yet for a > spring cleaning? Since I'm very bad at API design, I won't start such a project, but you are very welcome to discuss potential improvements, and it's very cheap to start a new branch in the git repository. Werner ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
