Re: [FRIAM] Stating the obvious

2008-02-03 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Don Begley wrote:
 Not exactly complexity, but Joe Nocera's take 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/02/technology/02nocera.html?themc=th on 
 MS/Yahoo is well said.
But web-based applications are limited by what web browsers can do, and 
how fast they can do it.   As those things improve (e.g. JITed 
JavaScript), Microsoft has their whole technology platform to draw upon:

http://labs.live.com/volta

Meanwhile, they have most of the desktops in the world, and stock that 
performs well... 

Marcus


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Stating the obvious

2008-02-03 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Birchard Hayes wrote:
 The offending line is using System; which creates several problems.   
 The first is that this code will only run on Windows and only in  
 Internet Explorer.
That's the innovation.  CLR bytecodes are interpreted on a JavaScript 
interpreter.  For example, the demos they have on the Volta site work 
(http://labs.live.com/volta/samples.aspx) just fine in Firefox, if slowly.

Indeed `System' is native to Windows, and that fact could be detected 
such that CLI bytecodes could be directed to the native engine on a 
Windows or Mono-based system for fast execution.  Further, Firefox will 
also soon have a high performance JIT for JavaScript.
 Instead of using Microsoft's Volta, I would suggest using tools from  
 Google Code, http://code.google.com ,
Google does have GWT, but the difference is that they have a very simple 
toolkit, not all of Java EE, which would be the analogue to Volta/.NET.  
Also Google lacks the very substantial IP in compiler technology that 
Microsoft has.
 or Yahoo's developer kits, http://developer.yahoo.com 
You mean Microsoft's.   ;-)


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Inside the gPhone: What to expect from Google's Android alliance

2008-02-03 Thread Frank Wimberly
http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/02/01/271/


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:24 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] Inside the gPhone: What to expect from Google's Android
alliance

Fairly interesting discussion of the gPhone, and why many of us who  
can't use the iPhone because of ATT find it compelling:
   http://tinyurl.com/2b6gog

Basically I'd prefer an open, heterogeneous invironment, and Google is  
not quite so evil as MS and Apple.  Soon, but not yet.

 -- Owen




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


[FRIAM] SIGGRAPH and visualizing complexity

2008-02-03 Thread Stephen Guerin
SIGGRAPH has a call for complexity and visual analtyics this year:
http://www.siggraph.org/s2008/submissions/juried/complexity/

Do you have a full demographic interface or a particularly smart way of
dealing with massive amounts of data? For SIGGRAPH 2008, we seek work that
addresses three complementary issues: complexity of data, accessibility of
information, and interaction.

Topics might include:

* Handling large datasets, from one source or millions of physical or
virtual interfaces
* Visualizing complexity, visual analytics
* Visualization-based decision and control
* Anytime or anywhere: from mobile devices to multiple displays

Our goal for this theme is to highlight the increasingly important question of
how to manage the increasingly large quantities of data in our electronic world.
We welcome proposals for any presentations on this theme, but particularly
appropriate are presentations from researchers, artists, or practitioners who
are engaged in technical or social advancements in this area.


--- -. .   ..-. .. ...    - .-- ---   ..-. .. ... 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.Redfish.com
624 Agua Fria Street, Santa Fe, NM 87501
mobile: (505)577-5828
office: Santa Fe, NM (505)995-0206 / London, UK +44 (0) 20 7993 4769



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Stating the obvious

2008-02-03 Thread Birchard Hayes

On Feb 3, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
 Indeed `System' is native to Windows, and that fact could be detected
 such that CLI bytecodes could be directed to the native engine on a
 Windows or Mono-based system for fast execution.  Further, Firefox  
 will
 also soon have a high performance JIT for JavaScript.

I still don't trust the MS security model, but could just suffering  
from a knee jerk anti-MS reaction.  The inclusion of the System  
library really ought to be completely superfluous on the client, and  
may in fact be unnecessary.  However, MS has found that many  
developers liberally cut and paste from example code and including  
that library smacks of the old this web site is designed for, and  
will only work on IE even if other browsers are supported.   Java  
code also often includes a System library and it has always caused me  
pain when my students include entire libraries that they haven't used  
and thus create bloated, potentially unsecured byte code.

The biggest performance hit for JavaScript is dynamic typing, high  
performance JIT or not.  Once understood, the pitfalls of dynamic  
typing can be avoided.  I feel myself verging on a rant about the  
state of Comp Sci education, so I won't digress.

 Instead of using Microsoft's Volta, I would suggest using tools from
 Google Code, http://code.google.com ,
 Google does have GWT, but the difference is that they have a very  
 simple
 toolkit, not all of Java EE, which would be the analogue to  
 Volta/.NET.
 Also Google lacks the very substantial IP in compiler technology that
 Microsoft has.

True, although I still prefer Intel's compiler to that of Visual  
Studio.  I have to concede that Google code may not have been the best  
example of the alternatives.  Their business model has, after all,  
become more advertising focused.


 or Yahoo's developer kits, http://developer.yahoo.com
 You mean Microsoft's.   ;-)

Ha ha ha, I totally forgot about that acquisition - Point taken!


Humanity is acquiring all the right technology for all the wrong  
reasons.
~R. Buckminster Fuller

    Use of advanced messaging technology does not imply 
   * an endorsement of western industrial civilization *




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] huge amount of material on Second Life

2008-02-03 Thread Robert Holmes
In this month's Physics World: Doing physics in Second Life
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/32673

Robert

P.S. Nick - apparently NOAA have got an SL presence... you could have your
avatar wander through its favourite storm system.

On Feb 1, 2008 8:58 PM, James Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 FWIW, my employer, Thopmson Scientific, has joined the many companies
 choosing to have a presence in Second Life(SL).

 I have finagled myself a spot on the dev team for the island (the rest
 of.the team is one guy who has been working on it for a year)

 I been curious about doing ABM or AA stuff in SL for a while, so this
 seemed like a good opp to get in it, at no cost, and with enough
 pressure that I'd actually do it.

 So, come on over to thomson island (it's still a work in progress)

 I'm turtle schism or sometimes turtle voom

 ~~James


 On 2/1/08, Marcus G. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Here's a high level and technical overview of Second Life.  (A long but
  fascinating video.)
 
 
 http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/4/1/94138e2a-d9dc-435a-9240-bcd985bf5bd7/Jim-Cory-SecondLife.wmv
 
  Also note the new simulator:
 
  https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Mono
 
 
  
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
 

 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

[FRIAM] JASSS on validation

2008-02-03 Thread Robert Holmes
The latest issue of JASSS has an interesting article on the practice (rather
than theory) of ABM validation: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/5.html

Robert

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org