Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-07 Thread qef

 Owen --

An excellent point to Roger and the rest of us. Frankly, I struggle with my RSS 
feeds: at present, Bloglines has me at 576, which is probably on the high end 
of most users. Still, I like them largely because I selected them, which 
suggests a certain echo chamber bias. I read probably 20% within a week, 
another 30% within 30 days, and the remainder within 90 days. The latency 
bothers me a bit, since time matters somewhat, but I'm unlikely to devote more 
than about 20 hours/week to blogs directly. It's much better than surfing 
around to each, however.

I'd like to read some blogs more frequently (bOING bOING, for example), but 
find that the number of entries fills up quickly, and when I'm scanning, I'm 
much more likely to go for my more macroeconomic blogs that have had 10 entries 
since last I looked than those that have had 150. Maybe there's an interesting 
opportunity for blogs to optimize posting frequency, bearing in mind 
Machiavelli's admonition:

Benefits should be conferred gradually; and in that way they will taste better. 
(probably not the best translation, but the best I could find on the Internets).


- Claiborne Booker -?





 


 

-Original Message-
From: Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Sent: Thu, Sep 3, 2009 4:35 pm
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs









On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:?
?

 I just put it all into Google Reader and star the stuff I might want?

 to go back to read later.  If I get too far behind, I just mark it all?

 read and go on.?

?

 -- rec --?
?


The problem is that you are a computer pro.  I doubt you could show others how 
to think in this fashion.  You need to understand blogs, and that they are 
article based with dates.  You'd have to explain RSS feeds as a notification 
stunt.  You'd have to explain that there are ways to use the feeds: Google 
Reader, Browser functionalities, Aggregators, and so on.  It really is hard, at 
least at the conceptual level for non-geeks.?
?

I remember *several* folks at the complex begging for chats on how to use the 
web so to speak.  We never got around to it, but boy would it be useful.  Don 
had a few barn raising sessions: come with your laptop and we'll show you how 
to use the wiki or how to use forums.  Maybe we ought to go back to that??
?

?   -- Owen?
?

?


?

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv?

Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College?

lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org?



 


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-04 Thread Nicholas Thompson
It may be the Berkeley Relic speaking in me, but I have often found
ettiquette to be the next door neighbor of fascism.  

Do you all remember the Sandwich Nazi of Seinfeld?

N

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




 [Original Message]
 From: glen e. p. ropella g...@agent-based-modeling.com
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
 Date: 9/4/2009 9:06:50 AM
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

 Thus spake Owen Densmore circa 09/03/2009 03:35 PM:
  I remember *several* folks at the complex begging for chats on how to
  use the web so to speak.  We never got around to it, but boy would it
  be useful.  Don had a few barn raising sessions: come with your laptop
  and we'll show you how to use the wiki or how to use forums.  Maybe we
  ought to go back to that?

 The trouble with this sort of thing is that (I posit) that the internet
 has been successful because of the low-overhead (read I can use it
 however I want because it's simple and composable) protocols.  Adding
 layers of abstraction like etiquette and how to (properly) use it are
 quickly rendered obsolete.

 A better set of howtos would target _very_ specific and concrete
 actions... like, how to find out who added that clearly biased clause to
 the Wikipedia entry on Haskell. [grin]  Or, how to cross-correlate
 forums to find out whether a blogger is using another identity to
 comment on his own blog entries.

 -- 
 glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://agent-based-modeling.com


 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-04 Thread glen e. p. ropella
Thus spake Nicholas Thompson circa 09-09-04 01:18 PM:
 It may be the Berkeley Relic speaking in me, but I have often found
 ettiquette to be the next door neighbor of fascism.  

It doesn't ring the same bells for me.  I'm fond of Eco's (vague but
indicating) characteristics of fascism:

   1. cult of tradition
   2. luddism/irrationalism
   3. action for action's sake
   4. anti-critical
   5. fear of dissension
   6. appeal to the frustrated middle
   7. pervasive belief in conspiracy
   8. the myopic underdog
   9. life is warfare
  10. contempt for underlings
  11. herophilia or glorification of martyrdom
  12. conflation of the biological with the social
  13. abstracted (ideal, not real) body politic
  14. newspeak

And I don't really see a good place to put etiquette.  I suppose various
colors of it could fall under (1), (4), (5), and (14)... and, perhaps
(2) and (8) on a stretch.  But, mostly, etiquette is just an attempt to
govern based on a minimal, civilized, set of soft rules.  Everything
anti-fascist can still take place within the bounds of etiquette.

But the thing I was trying to point out was that any standard of
behavior over and above what is possible is easily punctured when the
underlying components are simple and easily composed.  A great example
is a unix shell.  An interesting example is, say, RESTful web
development.  A self-referencing example is the recent discussion of
kitchen-sink ABM frameworks.  A HowTo on how to use a wiki is a lot
like one on how to build an ABM.

But a HowTo on how to build a page graph in a wiki is much more
tenable, even though it's still multivalent.  The more specific and
concrete you get, the more likely you'll be successful.  (... unless
your goal is to use large catch-all buzzwords to get people excited
without giving them any real tools they can take home with them, in
which case you want to be as general and abstract as possible.)

A more reflective point about puncturing standards of behavior (e.g.
Ikea's recent font change) is that when a subset of the participants
_expect_ an easily punctured standard, innovative participants will
inevitably be considered rude or as not being team players.  I think
this is why the internet intensifies people's feelings that others are
rude or obnoxious because the internet consists of simple, easily
composed things that no matter what organization one chooses for her
construct, it will violate some other person's standard.  That also
leads to a much larger number of should statements... One should
never use orange text on a blue background! [grin]

-- 
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://agent-based-modeling.com



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-04 Thread glen e. p. ropella
Thus spake Owen Densmore circa 09/03/2009 03:35 PM:
 I remember *several* folks at the complex begging for chats on how to
 use the web so to speak.  We never got around to it, but boy would it
 be useful.  Don had a few barn raising sessions: come with your laptop
 and we'll show you how to use the wiki or how to use forums.  Maybe we
 ought to go back to that?

The trouble with this sort of thing is that (I posit) that the internet
has been successful because of the low-overhead (read I can use it
however I want because it's simple and composable) protocols.  Adding
layers of abstraction like etiquette and how to (properly) use it are
quickly rendered obsolete.

A better set of howtos would target _very_ specific and concrete
actions... like, how to find out who added that clearly biased clause to
the Wikipedia entry on Haskell. [grin]  Or, how to cross-correlate
forums to find out whether a blogger is using another identity to
comment on his own blog entries.

-- 
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://agent-based-modeling.com



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


[FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-03 Thread Jochen Fromm
Here is a list of 40 good Psychology blogs, 
which Psychology blogs do you read regularly?

http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/07/40-superb-psychology-blogs.php

-J.


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-03 Thread Nicholas Thompson
I am the only person  in the world who doesnt read blogs?  

But I have to say this site looks interesting.  May 

Nick 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




 [Original Message]
 From: Jochen Fromm jfr...@t-online.de
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Friam@redfish.com
 Date: 9/3/2009 7:17:24 PM
 Subject: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

 Here is a list of 40 good Psychology blogs, 
 which Psychology blogs do you read regularly?
 http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/07/40-superb-psychology-blogs.php

 -J.

 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-03 Thread Douglas Roberts
That you didn't read blogs would surprise me, as interested as you are in
*other* people's opinions...

;-}

--Doug

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Nicholas Thompson 
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:

 I am the only person  in the world who doesnt read blogs?




  [Original Message]
  From: Jochen Fromm jfr...@t-online.de
  To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
 Friam@redfish.com
  Date: 9/3/2009 7:17:24 PM
  Subject: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs
 
  Here is a list of 40 good Psychology blogs,
  which Psychology blogs do you read regularly?
  http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/07/40-superb-psychology-blogs.php
 
  -J.
 
  
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




-- 
Doug Roberts
drobe...@rti.org
d...@parrot-farm.net
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] Psychology Blogs

2009-09-03 Thread Roger Critchlow
I just put it all into Google Reader and star the stuff I might want
to go back to read later.  If I get too far behind, I just mark it all
read and go on.

-- rec --

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Owen Densmoreo...@backspaces.net wrote:
 On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:

 That you didn't read blogs would surprise me, as interested as you are in
 *other* people's opinions...


 To be fair, following blogs can be difficult.  So many interesting ones, so
 little time.

 Tom Johnson does a great job at it .. Tom: do you use some sort of
 aggregator? Or just rss feeds?

 The browser I use makes it fairly easy to follow blogs via rss feeds.  But I
 ran into trouble when I followed several really busy blogs via rss -- I'd
 end up with 100 entries within a day or so.

 So I break blog usage into three modes:
 - RSS feeds for 20-30 blogs that publish daily or less.
 - Direct links to the busy blogs that I care about.
 - And best of all FRIAM and other great groups who point things out to me!

    -- Owen

 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org