[Full-disclosure] new backframe release

2006-12-24 Thread pdp (architect)
just for Christmas, there is a new backframe release:
http://www.gnucitizen.org/backframe/
http://www.gnucitizen.org/projects/backframe/

-- 
pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
http://www.gnucitizen.org

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] comparing information security to other industries

2006-12-24 Thread Michael Zimmermann
Am Dienstag, den 19.12.2006, 12:16 -0800 schrieb KT:
 How do we compare to other industries like construction, engineering,
 finance? What I am trying to figure out is how mature we are and how
 long will it take for to get stable?


Mature? Are you kidding? Computer security ist still mainly only
changing pampers after each incident.

That's because the common systems (software/hardware/social) are not
built for security but for money or fame.


All other industries you have mentioned are having established
procedures, rules and laws how to build their products and verify
the quality. Computer industry hasn't.

Just imagine a construction company who sells their houses only 
to people who sign a legally binding contract, that they accept
the house as it it, without any guaranty that it is possible to
live in it. If the house breaks down over you and your family
you are elegible to get the money back - and no more. If burglars
celebrate parties in the house while you are at the office,
because it is well known that the backdoor-keys are identical
in all houses of that construction company and key-duplicates 
can be found wherever you find two homeless people doing a chat,
you are told to buy a separate product called SecuyKeys
(which costs at least 20% of the original price for the house).

You are not allowed to take the wallpapers from the wall and 
look behind to see how the house is constructed and get sued 
when you publish these so called vulnerabilities (which are 
in effect only the results of incomplete, greedy and careless
construction-work)


Just because companies are making money with computer 
security doesn't make it into an industry.

Why not answer two questions for yourself: 

a)
are the computer systems at large nowadays more secure than 
- say - ten years ago?
b)
how much more money is spent for computer security since then?


The answers point directly to the net effect of what you call
an industry.


And we - the IT-people - are responseable.


Greetings
Michael


___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] comparing information security to other industries

2006-12-24 Thread Brian Eaton
On 12/24/06, Michael Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 are the computer systems at large nowadays more secure than
 - say - ten years ago?

Some systems are.  But not because the software has gotten any better.
 Organizations have gotten better at defense-in-depth.

Consider patch management systems.  A decade ago, most companies
barely had one at all.  Today, companies are evaluating, verifying,
and pushing out patches within days of their release.  More networks
are isolated behind firewalls, and lots of workstations are using
host-based firewalls.  Even the low-end consumers have gotten better
at this: lots more people are using SOHO routers with firewalls
instead of a cable modem with a wide open internet connection.

The attackers have gotten better as well.  But even when the attackers
successfully exploit a new vulnerability, organizations are better
prepared to deal with the consequences.

You might see another codered type vulnerability in IIS, but there is
no way it would do as much damage as the original worm.

Regards,
Brian

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


[Full-disclosure] TimberWolf 1.2.2 vulnerable to XSS

2006-12-24 Thread corrado.liotta

-=[ADVISORY---]=-
  
TimberWolf 1.2.2 
   
   Author: CorryL[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
-=[]=-


-=[+] Application:TimberWolf
-=[+] Version:1.2.2
-=[+] Vendor's URL:   http://cms.gamezrule.org/index.php
-=[+] Platform:   Windows\Linux\Unix
-=[+] Bug type:   Cross-Site Script
-=[+] Exploitation:   Remote
-=[-]
-=[+] Author:   CorryL  ~ corryl80[at]gmail[dot]com ~
-=[+] Reference:   www.x0n3-h4ck.org
-=[+] Virtual Office:  http://www.kasamba.com/CorryL
-=[+] Irc Chan: irc.darksin.net #x0n3-h4ck
-=[+] Special Thanks: Merry Christmas for All, Thanks for all  #x0n3-h4ck 
member, 
  un saluto a tutti gli avolesi nel mondo.

..::[ Descriprion ]::..

TimberWolf is Powered by PHP and runs off an MySQL database.
It has quite a few distinctive features amongst others.

It is 100% Freeware.
It is 100% easy to skin, and use.
It is 100% of everything you need.

The Admin Control Panel is Very simple, whereas the site itself looks the 
opposite.


..::[ Bug ]::..

this software is vulnerable to a type of called bug
cross-site script, a remote attaker is able to exploit
this vulnerability to draw information 



..::[ Proof Of Concept ]::..

http://remote 
site/shownews.php?nid='ScRiPt%20%0a%0dalert(1261667191)%3B/ScRiPt


..::[ Workaround ]::..




..::[ Disclousure Timeline ]::..

[19/12/2006] - Vendor notification
[24/12/2006] - Public disclousure

**
Registrati ad Alice Basic e scarica Alice Messenger, 
il nuovo instant messenger che ti fa chattare GRATIS con i tuoi amici!
Per maggiori informazioni vai su: 
http://adsl.alice.it/servizi/alicebasic.html?pmk=psmail_foot01
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

[Full-disclosure] Distributed Rainbow Table Project

2006-12-24 Thread opticfiber
Since November the folks at theminouche.net  hashbreaker.com have been 
working on a distributed rainbowtable project using BOINC. The project 
finished it's testing phase and went public as of yesterday.

See http://www.topsight.net/ for more info on the project


___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


[Full-disclosure] DNS-Pinning demo

2006-12-24 Thread Kanatoko

DNS-Pinning demo.
http://www.jumperz.net/index.php?i=2a=1b=7

Thanks to Martin Johns for the great article:
http://shampoo.antville.org/stories/1451301/

-- 
Kanatoko[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source WebAppFirewall
http://guardian.jumperz.net/

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


[Full-disclosure] Merry Christmas Youtube! (XSS vuln)

2006-12-24 Thread Paul
The following URL will cause javascript to execute in the context of youtube

http://www.youtube.com/p.swf?video_id=eVFF98kNg8Qeurl=t=iurl=javascript:alert('Javascript%20executed!\r\n\r\nLocation:
'%2bwindow.location%2b'\r\n\r\nCookie: '%2bdocument.cookie)

Cheers

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


[Full-disclosure] [YST] Full Disclosure - Paul Robinette / Renetto

2006-12-24 Thread Dexa Rouskies
***
_ 
_| | 
 _   _  ___  _   _ _| |_ _   _| |__  _ gonna kick ur ass to 
| | | |/ _ \| | | (_   _) | | |  _ \| ___ | the CURB
| |_| | |_| | |_| | | |_| |_| | |_) ) |
 \__  |\___/|/   \__)/|/|_)2006.
(/
_   __
___ _| |_   _ _ _| |__| |_ _ _  
 /___|_   _)/ ___) ___ | ___ (_   _)  (_   _) ___ ( |\
|___ | | |_| |   | | | | |_ | |_| / ___ | | | |
(___/   \__)_|   |_)_)  \__) \__)_)_|_|_|_|
***
FULL DISCLOSURE: Paul Robinette, Youtube evangelist, greedy jew, pedo

This document is the result of extensive research by the Youtube Street
Team.  The Youtube Street Team is privately funded in large part by
people such Lindsay Doty (Bravesgirl5), Andrea Davis (Violetkitty411),
Michael A. Michniewicz (Argent009), Dexarouskies, and ofcourse
Fattoothlessoveralls.

We are tired of this scum thinking he owns youtube.  The street team will
not stand for this.

HIS YOUTUBE PAGE: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=renetto
Paul Robinette, also known as Paul Robinett without the e, is trying to
build a corporate empire around his youtube name.  The only way we can
help this is by letting people know the truth, the street team will not
stand for this.  He spends his time posting pictures of his underage
daughter to attract the attention of fellow pedophiles.

1.) Home
2.) Business

*
1.) Home
*
Robinette, Andrea  Paul
116 W Columbus St
Canal Winchester, OH 43110
614-920-9535

Paul resides in Columbus, Ohio, with his wife Andrea and their four
children, Chase, Gracie, Daisy, and Noah.

He doesn't really seem to give a damn whether or not his children are
placed in the public eye.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fWflNc6k08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ICJCx0BaV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=du-y8XBSdsM 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clin5j0_z_0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFv1Ig2XmkM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_oTweYTKDI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0t5XQhv4As
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4U70n1C8d8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X85YqHw43ZM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73OewoBNvYU (rape neone?)

You can help by teaching him that the internet isn't a place for kids,
and pedophilia is no laughing matter.

*
2.) Business
*
He claims to have created this: http://www.paulrobinett.com/invention.php
aka www.renetto.com which links to = http://www.canopychair.com/.

a.) His business location ===
Paul Robinette owns candle store, ofcourse in an act of blatant
narcissism and grandiose, marketing his face.  It is located in the
shortnorth arts district (www.shortnorth.org) find more at
http://www.shortnorth.org/detail.asp?m=292

Paul Robinett
7 Buttles Avenue
Columbus, OH 43215
614-221-7005

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=7+Buttles+Ave+Columbus,+OH+43215-1450sll=37.0625,-95.677068sspn=35.768112,71.103516ie=UTF8z=18ll=39.976808,-83.003447spn=0.002113,0.006099t=hom=1

b.) For folding chair 
renetto llc
steve tinto ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1.8887363886
Fax: +1.4802792318
8558 black star circle
columbia, MD 21045 US

Business partner

c.) T-shirts 
Administrative Contact:
Fox, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1262 Bryden Rd.
columbus, Ohio 43205
United States
(614) 746-0333 Fax --

Business Partner

d.) Other projects ===
Kelsyus portable hammock (patent 6,966,084) under: Kelsyus, LLC 
(Virginia Beach, VA)  filed April 16, 2003

*
That is all.
*

-- 
___
Search for products and services at:
http://search.mail.com

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] comparing information security to other industries

2006-12-24 Thread Michael Zimmermann
Hi Brian,

you answer from the viewpoint of somebody engaged in 
modern 'computer security'. But with the phrase 
at large I was meaning a more global view:

Two thirds of the PCs are estimated to contain
malware. We are so used to receive all kinds of
virusses, worms and trojans, that we NEED antivirus 
scanners and firewalls. Those defences are like
medicine, which you MUSt take - and the more medicine
you have to take, the more ill you are.

In the early 1980ies it was _unthinkable_ that a 
program would run on your systems, which you 
wouldn't know it existed and had installed for 
yourself. Nowadays it's the rare exception, when
a user knows what is running on his PC (and a
professional system admin, who knows every program
executing on his machine is also a rare thing, 
I think).

Complexity has grown, but our basic security
structures in hardware and software have have not.
Unix/Linux security is based on the classic Unix 
design (was it 1974 when it was published?), DOS
security is an unborn child while Windows security 
is not better than than of Linux. 

Why?

The Intel hardware for PCs was chosen on the basis 
of marketing thinking and not because it was 
technically better than it's alternative - nothing 
to say about security concerns. An executable stack
with decreasing addresses, unprotected memory and 
totally missing permission-scheme in the IBM PC and, 
and, and...

Marketing/money decision ruled the IT-Industry
since the first IBM PC was sold. Yet there have
existed better system- and hardware-designs
even before the IBM PC. Just to name two:
Motorola processors or the Multics OS.

Brian, IMO your argumentation is not a solution
to improve over-all security but is symptomatic 
for the lack of it.

A lot of patch-work and no broadly accepted
security concept. Only during the last years
that situation is changing slowly - but not
yet in the Windows realm. But a functioning 
PC security is needed IMO, at least I don't
want to live with a net, where hundred-
thousands of zombies can bring my server
down any moment or flood my MTA daily with
thousands of crap-email. These daily fights
may create a sort of dynamice equilibrium,
but are not what I call security or stability.


Greetings
Michael

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


[Full-disclosure] Happy Holidays

2006-12-24 Thread evilrabbi

Merry Christmas FD!
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/