i don't defend securityfocus either , it was just a example of moderated
security related group. i think if you have to say something related to
security it is good to post it on several newsgroups. when i post
something valuable i post to FD and securityfocus. i don't care about
their management staff or political orientations.
Randal T. Rioux wrote:
Javor Ninov wrote:
do you realize that your so-called popularity is based on the fact that
FD is not moderated ? strange .. i don't see you on securityfocus.com
n3td3v wrote:
No THINK required, IS BIG, FACT.
Not to defend the mighty 'd3v, but securityfocus.com, aka Symantec, is
trash. They delete any posting to any of their owned lists that say even
the slightest bad thing about any of their weak products.
Despite the trolls, FD is the last great pasture of free security
discussion. The securityfocus lists are for clueless management types
looking to pick up buzzwords for their next big useless presentation to
the CEOs.
Randy
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
