Re: [Full-disclosure] Removing seless email addresses (on FD list)

2012-12-12 Thread Alan J. Wylie
Christian Sciberras uuf6...@gmail.com writes:

 Can't we somehow limit this? I recall in other newsgroups software,
 several bounced(reply) emails to a periodic (monthly? bimonthly?) ping
 would automatically retire the email in question (perhaps after a
 warning or something such).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path

-- 
Alan J. Wylie  http://www.wylie.me.uk/

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Removing seless email addresses (on FD list)

2012-12-12 Thread John Cartwright
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:58:58PM +0100, Christian Sciberras wrote:
 It is quite annoying to have a volley of bounce mail form
 non-existent/(re)moved mailboxes.
 
 Can't we somehow limit this? I recall in other newsgroups software, several
 bounced(reply) emails to a periodic (monthly? bimonthly?) ping would
 automatically retire the email in question (perhaps after a warning or
 something such).

We do. You are seeing the 1% that have odd bounce setups that defeat the
automated bounce processing.  The fact that the bounce comes to you and not
the list will also give you a hint as to why it is hard to catch these :)

When time permits I also examine bounces I receive from sending messages
like this, the List Charter, etc.  This is not a fun task.

As a general point, please do not post administrivia to the list unless
absolutely necessary - email me directly in the first instance, thanks.

Cheers
- John

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Removing seless email addresses (on FD list)

2012-12-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Christian Sciberras uuf6...@gmail.com wrote:
 John (Cartwright),


 It is quite annoying to have a volley of bounce mail form
 non-existent/(re)moved mailboxes.

 Can't we somehow limit this? I recall in other newsgroups software, several
 bounced(reply) emails to a periodic (monthly? bimonthly?) ping would
 automatically retire the email in question (perhaps after a warning or
 something such).
+1

Ditto for BugTraq.

Jeff

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/