Wouldn.t the they just go after the "owner" of the public hotspot? The same
way they go after ISP's when they try to tell them it was those "pre-paid"
accounts?
I still find it sickening that my ISP is meant to censor my online activity.
Although in the above case it would have been breaking the law to
download "warez".
The standard what's next argument still applies... If they censor one thing
it's a small step to the next one and so on...
Jack.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:08:49AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone examined the idea of using a public hotspot on a local
> network to shield BSA, RIAA, MPAA lawsuits? Since the tracking
> stops at the public facing IP, who is to say it wasn't some
> freeloader downloading the warez?
>
> Just looking for some feedback on this one...
>
>
>
> Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
> secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
>
> Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
> http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434
>
> Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program:
> http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
