[Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-24 Thread klondike
El 24/04/12 14:41, Григорий Братислава escribió:
> Is good evening.
Is good afternoon.
>  I is would like to warn you about is vulnerability in
> Backtrack is all version.
I is want to advise you on one failure in Gentoo Hardened at all types
> Backtrack Linux is penetration tester is system. Is come complete with
> tool for to make hacking for penetration tester.
Gentoo Hardened is advanced security is system. Is come complete with
hardened nucleum for to make at system is securer
> In is booting Backtrack, vulnerability exist in booting for when start
> if attacker is edit grub, attacker can bypass restricted user and is
> boot into admin account. E.g.:
In is making Gentoo Hardened, failure exist in sysadmin at when usage if
attacker is rubber hose, attacker can override authentication and is
make admin account. Making simple program. E.g.:
1. Apply rubber hose for sysadmin
2. Ask at password and try it.
3. If error make 1.

> I is will make this into video for bypassing security in Backtrack for
> to post on InfoSecInstitute
I is will be this for video by bypassing security at Gentoo Hardened or
to post by Youtube. I is named "Reservoir Dogs".

PD: Bad English written on purpose, please forgive me for any correct
grammar I may have used :P
PD2: Григорий seeing your historial I think the mail was a joke but
anyway, just in the improbable case it may not be:
  1. Bad administration issues are not global to a distro issues.
  2. Make sure a vulnerability is not a not so secure by design feature.
  3. Really if you ever want to write a paper or something make sure you
get it readen by at least two or three english speaking partners for
your own sake.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-24 Thread Milan Berger
> PD: Bad English written on purpose, please forgive me for any correct
> grammar I may have used :P
> PD2: Григорий seeing your historial I think the mail was a joke but

if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...


-- 
Kind Regards

Milan Berger
Project-Mindstorm Technical Engineer

---
project-mindstorm.net
Fruehlingstrasse 4 
90537 Feucht
Germany

Mob.: +49 176 22 98 76 02

https://www.ghcif.de
http://www.nopaste.info (for sale)
https://www.digital-bit.ch
http://www.project-mindstorm.net


twitter: http://twitter.com/twit4c

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-24 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...

I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...


pgpBMDMGRP44M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-24 Thread Thor (Hammer of God)
Which always turns out to be the best...

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Sent: 4/24/2012 9:16 AM
To: Milan Berger
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...

I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> > if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
> 
> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...



this one appears to be true:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
(check the date)

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>
>
> this one appears to be true:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
> (check the date)
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Nope, im still here :p

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>
>
> this one appears to be true:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
> (check the date)
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that, 
nobody really knew why though.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
> except it was rather obvious why.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
 On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
 I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>>>
>>> this one appears to be true:
>>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
>>> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
>>> (check the date)
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
>> nobody really knew why though.
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
In hindsight yes.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Benji
No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
than thinking.


On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
> On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
>>
>> except it was rather obvious why.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>
>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
>
> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...


 this one appears to be true:
 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
 Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
 (check the date)

 ___
 Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
 Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
 Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
>>> nobody really knew why though.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> In hindsight yes.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 4:54 AM, Benji wrote:
> No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
> the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
> not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
> than thinking.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
>>> except it was rather obvious why.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelaiwrote:
 On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>
> this one appears to be true:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
> (check the date)
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
 And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
 nobody really knew why though.

 ___
 Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
 Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
 Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> In hindsight yes.
There are any number of reasons why someone, even sabu could have 
stopped tweeting then started back up again. It just turned out that 
this was the case this time.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Benji
And choosing to believe any of the other reasons when you think you're
an '1337 hacker' and are involved in that world, is a personality
problem, end of.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
> On 4/25/12 4:54 AM, Benji wrote:
>>
>> No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
>> the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
>> not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
>> than thinking.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:

 except it was rather obvious why.

 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai
  wrote:
>
> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:

 if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a
 joke...
>>>
>>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>>
>>
>> this one appears to be true:
>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
>> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
>> (check the date)
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
> nobody really knew why though.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>> In hindsight yes.
>
> There are any number of reasons why someone, even sabu could have stopped
> tweeting then started back up again. It just turned out that this was the
> case this time.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 4:59 AM, Benji wrote:
> And choosing to believe any of the other reasons when you think you're
> an '1337 hacker' and are involved in that world, is a personality
> problem, end of.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 4:54 AM, Benji wrote:
>>> No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
>>> the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
>>> not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
>>> than thinking.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelaiwrote:
 On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
> except it was rather obvious why.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai
>   wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
>>> wrote:
 On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a
> joke...
 I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>>>
>>> this one appears to be true:
>>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
>>> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
>>> (check the date)
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
>> nobody really knew why though.
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
 In hindsight yes.
>> There are any number of reasons why someone, even sabu could have stopped
>> tweeting then started back up again. It just turned out that this was the
>> case this time.
I prefer not making assumptions about things i dont have any information 
on.  Sorry you consider that a personality problem :p

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Benji
You should be paranoid if someone could construe what you're doing as illegal.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
> On 4/25/12 4:59 AM, Benji wrote:
>>
>> And choosing to believe any of the other reasons when you think you're
>> an '1337 hacker' and are involved in that world, is a personality
>> problem, end of.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/25/12 4:54 AM, Benji wrote:

 No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
 the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
 not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
 than thinking.


 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelai
  wrote:
>
> On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
>>
>> except it was rather obvious why.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>
>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a
>> joke...
>
> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...


 this one appears to be true:
 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
 Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
 (check the date)

 ___
 Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
 Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
 Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about
>>> that,
>>> nobody really knew why though.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> In hindsight yes.
>>>
>>> There are any number of reasons why someone, even sabu could have stopped
>>> tweeting then started back up again. It just turned out that this was the
>>> case this time.
>
> I prefer not making assumptions about things i dont have any information on.
>  Sorry you consider that a personality problem :p

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Laurelai
On 4/25/12 5:08 AM, Benji wrote:
> You should be paranoid if someone could construe what you're doing as illegal.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 4:59 AM, Benji wrote:
>>> And choosing to believe any of the other reasons when you think you're
>>> an '1337 hacker' and are involved in that world, is a personality
>>> problem, end of.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Laurelaiwrote:
 On 4/25/12 4:54 AM, Benji wrote:
> No, with open eyes sight. If you chose not to believe the obvious at
> the time, that is your own mistake and proof that you (general you,
> not you specifically) were more interested in being part of the crowd
> than thinking.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Laurelai
>   wrote:
>> On 4/25/12 4:48 AM, Benji wrote:
>>> except it was rather obvious why.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai
>>>   wrote:
 On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
>>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a
>>> joke...
>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>
> this one appears to be true:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
> (check the date)
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
 And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about
 that,
 nobody really knew why though.

 ___
 Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
 Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
 Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> In hindsight yes.
 There are any number of reasons why someone, even sabu could have stopped
 tweeting then started back up again. It just turned out that this was the
 case this time.
>> I prefer not making assumptions about things i dont have any information on.
>>   Sorry you consider that a personality problem :p
Well its a good thing I dont do illegal shit, probably why im not 
paranoid all the time.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Benji
except it was rather obvious why.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Laurelai  wrote:
> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
 if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
>>> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
>>
>>
>> this one appears to be true:
>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
>> Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
>> (check the date)
>>
>> ___
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> And thats when sabu was MIA from twitter and everyone knew about that,
> nobody really knew why though.
>
> ___
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in Gentoo hardened

2012-04-25 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:26:57AM -0500, Laurelai wrote:
> On 4/25/12 3:56 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15:26PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:36:55 +0200, Milan Berger said:
> >>> if you read his "advisories" and "0-days" you know: It's not a joke...
> >> I always thought it was misunderstood performance art...
> >
> >
> > this one appears to be true:
> > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jul/312
> > Full disclosure is arrest of Sabu
> > (check the date)
> >
> Nope, im still here :p
>

ok, sorry.

i mean the Sabu part of the email.

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/