Re: [Full-disclosure] [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface

2007-07-22 Thread pdp (architect)
just to add,

Google WebSearch is just one of the many services that offer feed
export. Pretty much everything else has that option too and can be
accessed through basic auth. I know that this is an obstacle. However,
keep in mind that the purpose of this post is not to show how to own
people but elaborate on what can be done after that. I mean, if the
attacker has access to your account, they may as well turn the
WebHistory ON if it s OFF. All attackers want from you is to get your
secrets. Consider it like the situation where you have a
physical/remote access to a machine and now you want to install a
rootkit or keylogger.

On 7/22/07, Greenarrow 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, for one, for security purposes why would anyone log into Google for
 search purposes. Second, most people I know who use any type of security
 usually use a proxy if they are doing unknown type searches or surfing the
 web.  This would place a kink in the ease of getting the info you stated in
 your email.

 While yes if anyone wanted to get your info that bad it would not matter
 what method one uses but I see the way you show as being the way a common
 Window home user would seek search data and I sure hope that corporate does
 not go this route.

 Regards,
 George
 Greenarrow1
 InNetInvestigations-Forensic


 - Original Message -
 From: pdp (architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk; OWASP Leaders
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WASC Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 2:04 AM
 Subject: [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface


  http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/snoop-onto-them-as-they-snoop-onto-us
 
  This is not that of a news since the service is available since
  January this year, however I cannot see that many people discussing
  it. Anyway, Google allows consummation of SearchHistory profiles as
  simple RSS/ATOM feeds. IMHO, this will impact the security and privacy
  of the users (us) quite significantly.
 
  [...]
 
  The search history feed can be access from the following url:
  http://www.google.com/history/?output=rss. The interesting thing is
  that if your are not authenticated, the Google service will ask you to
  do so but though HTTP Basic Authentication. Now we all know how weak
  Basic Authentication is. By default, basic auth does not have any
  account lockout capabilities. Yes, this feature can be introduced and
  I haven't really tested it out on the Google's SearchHistory feed
  interface.
  Apart from that, the real danger is that if someone has your account
  details, they could potentially become your invisible stalker. Snoop
  onto Them as they Snoop onto us. In the digital age, compromising
  someones email just for the sake of it does not make sense. What is
  more interesting, is to learn as much as possible from the victim and
  use this knowledge for your own benefit. This is what attackers will
  be after.
 
  Relevant searches, places that you have been, stats, trends, secrets.
  If you have the Google Toolbar then you are even more screwed, since
  every step that you make will be recorded. Given the fact that
  everything is accessed via RSS, this information be easily analyzed,
  aggregated and even exported to the NET for everyone to see. As we all
  know Basic Auth credentials are part of the URL scheme, almost every
  RSS/ATOM aggregator supports them:
  http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/history/?output=rss. What is
  even worse is that we can also perform queries on the history like
  this: https://www.google.com/searchhistory/find?q=[query]output=rss.
 
  Keep in mind that the SearchHistory is recording your moves no matter
  whether you want it or not. Your actions will be recorded for as long
  as you perform queries while being logged into Google or you have the
  Google Browser Toolbar installed.
 
  I am not saying that GOOGLE is bad. All I am saying is that someone
  can use this interface to harm others. It makes the process so much
  easier.
 
  --
  pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
  http://www.gnucitizen.org
 
  
  Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec
 
  Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
  http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/
 
  Subscribe via RSS:
  http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]
 
 



-- 
pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
http://www.gnucitizen.org

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface

2007-07-21 Thread Greenarrow 1
Well, for one, for security purposes why would anyone log into Google for 
search purposes. Second, most people I know who use any type of security 
usually use a proxy if they are doing unknown type searches or surfing the 
web.  This would place a kink in the ease of getting the info you stated in 
your email.

While yes if anyone wanted to get your info that bad it would not matter 
what method one uses but I see the way you show as being the way a common 
Window home user would seek search data and I sure hope that corporate does 
not go this route.

Regards,
George
Greenarrow1
InNetInvestigations-Forensic


- Original Message - 
From: pdp (architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk; OWASP Leaders 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; WASC Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 2:04 AM
Subject: [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface


 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/snoop-onto-them-as-they-snoop-onto-us

 This is not that of a news since the service is available since
 January this year, however I cannot see that many people discussing
 it. Anyway, Google allows consummation of SearchHistory profiles as
 simple RSS/ATOM feeds. IMHO, this will impact the security and privacy
 of the users (us) quite significantly.

 [...]

 The search history feed can be access from the following url:
 http://www.google.com/history/?output=rss. The interesting thing is
 that if your are not authenticated, the Google service will ask you to
 do so but though HTTP Basic Authentication. Now we all know how weak
 Basic Authentication is. By default, basic auth does not have any
 account lockout capabilities. Yes, this feature can be introduced and
 I haven't really tested it out on the Google's SearchHistory feed
 interface.
 Apart from that, the real danger is that if someone has your account
 details, they could potentially become your invisible stalker. Snoop
 onto Them as they Snoop onto us. In the digital age, compromising
 someones email just for the sake of it does not make sense. What is
 more interesting, is to learn as much as possible from the victim and
 use this knowledge for your own benefit. This is what attackers will
 be after.

 Relevant searches, places that you have been, stats, trends, secrets.
 If you have the Google Toolbar then you are even more screwed, since
 every step that you make will be recorded. Given the fact that
 everything is accessed via RSS, this information be easily analyzed,
 aggregated and even exported to the NET for everyone to see. As we all
 know Basic Auth credentials are part of the URL scheme, almost every
 RSS/ATOM aggregator supports them:
 http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/history/?output=rss. What is
 even worse is that we can also perform queries on the history like
 this: https://www.google.com/searchhistory/find?q=[query]output=rss.

 Keep in mind that the SearchHistory is recording your moves no matter
 whether you want it or not. Your actions will be recorded for as long
 as you perform queries while being logged into Google or you have the
 Google Browser Toolbar installed.

 I am not saying that GOOGLE is bad. All I am saying is that someone
 can use this interface to harm others. It makes the process so much
 easier.

 -- 
 pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
 http://www.gnucitizen.org

 
 Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec

 Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
 http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/

 Subscribe via RSS:
 http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]

 

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Re: [Full-disclosure] [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface

2007-07-21 Thread pdp (architect)
comments inlined

On 7/22/07, Greenarrow 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, for one, for security purposes why would anyone log into Google for
 search purposes. Second, most people I know who use any type of security

people login to check their email, chat and play with the toys on
their iGoogle. for most of the time, they are logged into Google.

 usually use a proxy if they are doing unknown type searches or surfing the
 web.  This would place a kink in the ease of getting the info you stated in
 your email.


:) keep in mind that most users are not tech/sec savvy


 While yes if anyone wanted to get your info that bad it would not matter
 what method one uses but I see the way you show as being the way a common
 Window home user would seek search data and I sure hope that corporate does
 not go this route.


the point that I am try to make is that the attacker doesn't need to
have access to your computer anymore. The data is available online
24/7. It is a lot easier to access Google Feed then some computer
behind some obscured and poorly configured NATed network.


 Regards,
 George
 Greenarrow1
 InNetInvestigations-Forensic


Thanks George,

cheers :)


 - Original Message -
 From: pdp (architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk; OWASP Leaders
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WASC Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 2:04 AM
 Subject: [WEB SECURITY] digital stalking, Google SearchHistory RSS Interface


  http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/snoop-onto-them-as-they-snoop-onto-us
 
  This is not that of a news since the service is available since
  January this year, however I cannot see that many people discussing
  it. Anyway, Google allows consummation of SearchHistory profiles as
  simple RSS/ATOM feeds. IMHO, this will impact the security and privacy
  of the users (us) quite significantly.
 
  [...]
 
  The search history feed can be access from the following url:
  http://www.google.com/history/?output=rss. The interesting thing is
  that if your are not authenticated, the Google service will ask you to
  do so but though HTTP Basic Authentication. Now we all know how weak
  Basic Authentication is. By default, basic auth does not have any
  account lockout capabilities. Yes, this feature can be introduced and
  I haven't really tested it out on the Google's SearchHistory feed
  interface.
  Apart from that, the real danger is that if someone has your account
  details, they could potentially become your invisible stalker. Snoop
  onto Them as they Snoop onto us. In the digital age, compromising
  someones email just for the sake of it does not make sense. What is
  more interesting, is to learn as much as possible from the victim and
  use this knowledge for your own benefit. This is what attackers will
  be after.
 
  Relevant searches, places that you have been, stats, trends, secrets.
  If you have the Google Toolbar then you are even more screwed, since
  every step that you make will be recorded. Given the fact that
  everything is accessed via RSS, this information be easily analyzed,
  aggregated and even exported to the NET for everyone to see. As we all
  know Basic Auth credentials are part of the URL scheme, almost every
  RSS/ATOM aggregator supports them:
  http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/history/?output=rss. What is
  even worse is that we can also perform queries on the history like
  this: https://www.google.com/searchhistory/find?q=[query]output=rss.
 
  Keep in mind that the SearchHistory is recording your moves no matter
  whether you want it or not. Your actions will be recorded for as long
  as you perform queries while being logged into Google or you have the
  Google Browser Toolbar installed.
 
  I am not saying that GOOGLE is bad. All I am saying is that someone
  can use this interface to harm others. It makes the process so much
  easier.
 
  --
  pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
  http://www.gnucitizen.org
 
  
  Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec
 
  Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
  http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/
 
  Subscribe via RSS:
  http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]
 
 



-- 
pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
http://www.gnucitizen.org

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/