RE: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-22 Thread ALD, Aditya, Aditya Lalit Deshmukh
How do u know that you are looking for the irc traffic ? Somewhere you must
have see connections going out to some host or some connection attempts. You
could always try sniffing using that ip address on all ports if you have set
up everthing else correctly... 

How ever if something is not setup correctly then you would have trouble
shoot this. Maybe posting some more info will help us all diagnose this for
you and help u out - maybe offlist ? 

-aditya

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RandallM
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 05:04 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something 
wrong. Used the
6668-6669 ports. Any help? 
 
thank you
Randall M
 

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html





Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-22 Thread Harry Hoffman
Use ngrep to look for signs of irc (i.e. PRIVMSG) instead of just 
looking for the ports irc (ususally, but not always) runs on.

something like: ngrep -qitd eth0 'privmsg' will probably get you much 
better results.

HTH,
Harry
ALD, Aditya, Aditya Lalit Deshmukh wrote:
How do u know that you are looking for the irc traffic ? Somewhere you must
have see connections going out to some host or some connection attempts. You
could always try sniffing using that ip address on all ports if you have set
up everthing else correctly... 

How ever if something is not setup correctly then you would have trouble
shoot this. Maybe posting some more info will help us all diagnose this for
you and help u out - maybe offlist ? 

-aditya

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RandallM
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 05:04 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something 
wrong. Used the
6668-6669 ports. Any help? 

thank you
Randall M
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


[Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-21 Thread RandallM
I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something wrong. Used the
6668-6669 ports. Any help? 
 
thank you
Randall M
 

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-21 Thread Athanasius
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:34:00PM -0600, RandallM wrote:
 I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
 communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
 Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something wrong. Used the
 6668-6669 ports. Any help? 

  Well, default port for IRC is 6667, but many servers offer other
ports as well.  If you know the networks involved then check their
webpages for the list of servers/ports you'll want to monitor.

-Ath
-- 
- Athanasius = Athanasius(at)miggy.org / http://www.miggy.org/
  Finger athan(at)fysh.org for PGP key
   And it's me who is my enemy. Me who beats me up.
Me who makes the monsters. Me who strips my confidence. Paula Cole - ME


pgpTk0PiM4jKI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-21 Thread Kevin
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:34:00 -0600, RandallM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
 communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
 Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something wrong. Used the
 6668-6669 ports. Any help?

Not only can an IRC server be on any port (as mentioned by Oliver
Leitner), but clients can also tunnel the connection through proxies,
or even fully encrypt chat sessions inside SSL, within an SSH tunnel,
or in a binary packet protocol such as SILC.

Assuming the communication is in the clear, you could use Snort to
detect IRC communication, regardless of port.  More on this topic can
be found here:
http://www.giac.org/practical/GSEC/Chris_Hanna_GSEC.pdf

Kevin

(P.S. I don't know who Chris Hanna is, but the paper seems sound.)
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-21 Thread Jon Hart
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:34:00PM -0600, RandallM wrote:
 I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
 communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
 Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something wrong. Used the
 6668-6669 ports. Any help? 

In addition to the ports you and others mentioned, don't forget 194, 994
and 6665-6668/TCP.  994 is typically IRC over SSL so all you'll likely
be able to detect with a sniffer is the existence of 994/TCP traffic,
not that its actually SSL.

My suggestion?  Looking for 194, 994 and 6665-6668/TCP will only help
you locate legitimate IRC servers running on standard ports.  But the
really interesting traffic will be on other ports.  So use ngrep:

ngrep -i NICK|PRIVMSG tcp

(or something similar)

Snort has a set of signatures that could easily be modified to work on
arbitrary ports to detect IRC -- check out SID 542, 1463 and 1729.

-jon
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Scan for IRC

2005-01-21 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Friday, January 21, 2005 5:34 PM -0600 RandallM [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

I am so sorry for interrupting the list. I'm trying to pick up IRC
communications on the network. I've made some filters for Ethereal and
Observer but can't seem to pick it up. I'm doing something wrong. Used the
6668-6669 ports. Any help?
You'll have a lot more success using something like snort or tcpdump to 
catch them.  For example, you could easily write a couple of rules that 
would catch any IRC communications, regardless of the port used.

alert tcp $HOME_NET any - any any (msg:IRC communications; content: 
JOIN; sid: 100; rev:1;)
alert tcp $HOME_NET any - any any (msg:IRC communications; content: 
PRIVMSG; sid: 101; rev:1;)

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html