Re: ZPG & Y6B

1999-06-08 Thread John McLaughlin

I guess ZPG doesn't really mean ZPG.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Steve Kurtz wrote:

> Re-post from KZPG (excerpt) by Ed Glaze  
> 
>  "We don't see Y6B as a problem, but rather a milestone," said
> Zero Population Growth Director of Communications Tim Cline. The mission
> of
> Y6B is to educate women, provide women with economic opportunities and
> provide women with more reproductive health care.
> 
> 
> Ed says:
> 
> Again ZPG seems to avoid taking a stance on stopping or
> reducing overpopulation. A milestone is thought of by most
> people as an achievement and ZPG states that a population
> of 6 billion is not a problem. Whose side are these guys on?
> 
> If one of the leading population organizations implies that
> continued growth is not a problem is it any wonder that our
> government, media, and couples everywhere are unconcerned
> about overpopulation?
> 
> ZPG, by failing to take a stance on overpopulation, is undoing
> or at least limiting the impact all its population education
> programs may be having. Numbers are important and yet it
> is not hard to imagine that in about a dozen years ZPG will
> acknowledge yet another milestone -- Y7B.
> 



Re: Meadows on Smart Growth and Sprawl

1999-03-27 Thread John McLaughlin

Thank you, Rudy -- this supplements Steve's earlier posting very well, if
it's called upon.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Rudy Rogalsky wrote:

> Meadow's source for the 12 Big Myth's of Growth is Eben Fodor's 1999 big
> little book called Better not Bigger:How to Take Control of  Urban Growth
> and Improve Your Community. The whole book is excellent. Other chapter
> titles include
> Meet the Urban Growth Machine
> The Truth About Jobs, Housing and Growth
> Discovering the Real Costs of Growth in Your Community
> Putting the Brakes on Growth--What Works
> Also, Fodor has appended a bibliography Urban Growth Management sources
> and an extensive listing of mainly U.S. organizations concerned with land
> use.
> A gold mine of examples to back up your discussions with the growth-mania
> types.
> Rudy Rogalsky
> 
> 
> 



Re: Meadows on Smart Growth and Sprawl

1999-03-27 Thread John McLaughlin

I'm keeping it on file, thanks. There's a right nasty lot around here.
Plus pro-gambling casino operators, to whom many of the same arguments 
apply.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [IKD] Information overload and Indigenous Knowledge

1999-03-24 Thread John McLaughlin

The way to fight information overload is to provide more information to
overload the system?

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: "Earth's system as a whole"-US Public Broadcasting TV series

1999-03-11 Thread John McLaughlin

Problem is it's on opposite "NYPD."

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Worldwatch optimism??

1999-02-26 Thread John McLaughlin

On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Steve Kurtz wrote:

> This sound nice, but no mention is made of the NET ADDITION of over 7
> million humans per MONTH to earth's population. Attitides and awareness
> must include the responsibilities  and effects of procreation if the below
> perceptions are to become meaningfully realized. 

No mention is made of this element in eco-thinking, agreed; but it's hard
to avoid the conclusion that it must be entering into system-planning for 
this near-revolution in global thinking by various interested parties; how
could it be otherwise? 

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: G. Hardin new book

1999-02-08 Thread John McLaughlin

On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Ray E. Harrell wrote:

> Somewhere I read that the market must expand for it to work as a system.

And thus become, ultimately, unworkable as a system...?

> Could some of the economists fill me in on that one?

I must say I'm not an economist, altho I sometimes play one when I'm
pulling the ballot-lever.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: G. Hardin new book

1999-02-06 Thread John McLaughlin

Casts a cold eye on capitalist expansionism, doesn't it?

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]