I thought anyone can be classified as social
darwinists, if they think some sort of
"survival of the fittest" applies to
human society, or if they in fact
describe human society as not
distinguishable from that of "herd animals".
You gave the impression of accepting
opinions like these.

Eva



...
With respect to the title of this thread: "social Darwinism again".

In order to even understand the subject matter, one would have to be able to
differentiate between "social Darwinism" (politics) and "biological
Darwinism" (science).

Nowadays, there is a great deal of popular literature available on the
subject.

Jay   

Reply via email to