Re: FVWM: fvwm.org domain renewal

2013-07-26 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam  writes:

>On 26 Jul 2013 16:17, "Dan Espen"  wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Adam  writes:
>>
>> > Hi Jason,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:26:22AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III
>wrote:
>> >> Periodically folks have asked if they can donate to fvwm in some
>way. ‚ I
>> >> can't personally accept any donations and I would be shocked if
>anyone
>> >> else involved with the project were in it for the money.
>‚ However, there
>> >> is one fixed cost which I have generally borne myself but which
>anyone
>> >> else is welcome to take care of: the domain registration. ‚ (You
>do not
>> >> generally need to own a domain to renew it; they'll take money
>from
>> >> anyone.)
>> >
>> > Thanks for doing this; I've gone ahead and renewed this for the
>next three
>> > years. ‚ fvwm.org will therefore expire on 2014-12-29.
>>
>> I just did another 3 years.
>
>Had it expired already? Or can you renew at any time?

I think you can renew at any time.
Your mail above said it was going to expire next year December.
Actually I tried 3 years ago to extend to 6 but my credit card
company didn't let the charge through.  I called them this time.

-- 
Dan Espen




Re: FVWM: fvwm.org domain renewal

2013-07-26 Thread Thomas Adam
On 26 Jul 2013 16:17, "Dan Espen"  wrote:
>
> Thomas Adam  writes:
>
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:26:22AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> Periodically folks have asked if they can donate to fvwm in some way.
 I
> >> can't personally accept any donations and I would be shocked if anyone
> >> else involved with the project were in it for the money.  However,
there
> >> is one fixed cost which I have generally borne myself but which anyone
> >> else is welcome to take care of: the domain registration.  (You do not
> >> generally need to own a domain to renew it; they'll take money from
> >> anyone.)
> >
> > Thanks for doing this; I've gone ahead and renewed this for the next
three
> > years.  fvwm.org will therefore expire on 2014-12-29.
>
> I just did another 3 years.

Had it expired already? Or can you renew at any time?

Thomas Adam


Re: FVWM: fvwm.org domain renewal

2013-07-26 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam  writes:

> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:26:22AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> Periodically folks have asked if they can donate to fvwm in some way.  I
>> can't personally accept any donations and I would be shocked if anyone
>> else involved with the project were in it for the money.  However, there
>> is one fixed cost which I have generally borne myself but which anyone
>> else is welcome to take care of: the domain registration.  (You do not
>> generally need to own a domain to renew it; they'll take money from
>> anyone.)
>
> Thanks for doing this; I've gone ahead and renewed this for the next three
> years.  fvwm.org will therefore expire on 2014-12-29.

I just did another 3 years.

-- 
Dan Espen



Re: FVWM: xterm with FvwmIconBox on Fedora

2013-07-26 Thread lee
Thomas Adam  writes:

> On 18 July 2013 12:31, lee  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when starting FvwmIconBox with fvwm and then starting xterm, output to the
>> xterm window does not work, i. e. the window is blank until resized or
>> when the workspace is switched.
>
> It's such a shame that you chose to use FvwmIconBox.  It's one of
> those modules which is dead and hasn't been touched by anyone in more
> years than I can recall.  Don't use it.  This is why we have
> FvwmIconMan as its replacement.

I didn't know that it has been replaced with FvwmIconMan.  Is
FvwmIconBox now deprecated and only available for compatibility?  There
wouldn't be anything to keep me from switching, I guess.

>> When (re-)starting fvwm without the FvwmIconBox module, xterm works
>> fine.  Please see [1] for a more detailed reference.
>
> You haven't told us what your FVWM version is---what is it?

It's 2.6.5 as is currently in Fedora 19:


,
| [~] rpm -qi fvwm
| Name: fvwm
| Version : 2.6.5
| Release : 4.fc19
| Architecture: x86_64
| Install Date: Sat 13 Jul 2013 13:20:15 CEST
| Group   : User Interface/X
| Size: 7255461
| License : GPLv2+
| Signature   : RSA/SHA256, Fri 15 Mar 2013 15:27:27 CET, Key ID 
07477e65fb4b18e6
| Source RPM  : fvwm-2.6.5-4.fc19.src.rpm
| Build Date  : Thu 14 Feb 2013 19:50:52 CET
| Build Host  : buildvm-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org
| Relocations : (not relocatable)
| Packager: Fedora Project
| Vendor  : Fedora Project
| URL : http://www.fvwm.org/
| Summary : Highly configurable multiple virtual desktop window manager
| Description :
| Fvwm is a window manager for X11. It is designed to
| minimize memory consumption, provide a 3D look to window frames,
| and implement a virtual desktop.
| [~] 
`


>  Note that
> I doubt this is FVWM's fault, since I can't reproduce your problem at
> all.  Also:
>
> X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
>   Resource id in failed request:  0x0
>
> Says that XTerm fucked up to me.  I'll entertain this for one minute.

It is very well possible that the problem is with xterm --- or somewhere
else entirely.

> If you can get the window to be blank, can you please attach the
> output from "xprop", and then whilst it's still blank, run in another
> window "xprop -spy" and unblank the window?  Then put the log from
> that together with the other one and send it to me.

Sure, I'll send them to you.  Thank you for looking into this.


-- 
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "C-c C-c can do nothing useful at
this location")