Re: FVWM: Website
Dan Espen wrote: > I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant > to look at. I wonder what would make a better background, > a gradient or an image. Not that the white bothers me at all, but if it's supposed to mimic a root window, then how about a dark granite texture? AvW -- A.J. "Fonz" van Wervenmailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: FVWM: Website
Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 schrieb Dan Espen: > Thomas Adamwrites: > > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > >> Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice, > >> but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the > >> actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big > >> improvement, but so would a darker solid color. > > > > That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your issue, > > please? > > he's complaining that the web site looks like the user > has set the root window to white. > > I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant > to look at. I wonder what would make a better background, > a gradient or an image. > I'd suggest to make it plain black, but anything darker than #003c3c will do. Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.
Re: FVWM: Website
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Dan Espenwrote: > Thomas Adam writes: > > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > >> Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is > nice, > >> but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the > >> actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big > >> improvement, but so would a darker solid color. > > > > That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your > issue, > > please? > > he's complaining that the web site looks like the user > has set the root window to white. > > I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant > to look at. I wonder what would make a better background, > a gradient or an image. > > Easy enough to change, you can also hit the maximize button and get rid of the border all together. jaimos
Re: FVWM: Website
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice, > but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the > actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big > improvement, but so would a darker solid color. That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your issue, please? > I won't be replying to queries; I'm unsubscribing now as I haven't used FVWM > for a long time. Despite trying for years, I can't really get on with the > configuration language. I'm much happier with systems with few features > built-in, but scriptable in ways that make it easy for me to add more. I get > less confused that way. :) Well, FVWM is extensible just not likely in a way that's obvious to you, but at this point it's not only irrelevant, it's not worth the effort trying to convince you of it either. ;) -- Thomas Adam
FVWM: Website
Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice, but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big improvement, but so would a darker solid color. I won't be replying to queries; I'm unsubscribing now as I haven't used FVWM for a long time. Despite trying for years, I can't really get on with the configuration language. I'm much happier with systems with few features built-in, but scriptable in ways that make it easy for me to add more. I get less confused that way. :) -- I'm too old to use vi.