Re: FVWM: Website

2016-07-10 Thread Alphons van Werven
Dan Espen wrote:

> I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant
> to look at.  I wonder what would make a better background,
> a gradient or an image.

Not that the white bothers me at all, but if it's supposed to mimic a root
window, then how about a dark granite texture?

AvW

-- 
A.J. "Fonz" van Werven 
mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: FVWM: Website

2016-07-10 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 schrieb Dan Espen:
> Thomas Adam  writes:
> 
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> >> Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice,
> >> but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the
> >> actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big
> >> improvement, but so would a darker solid color.
> >
> > That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your issue,
> > please?
> 
> he's complaining that the web site looks like the user
> has set the root window to white.
> 
> I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant
> to look at.  I wonder what would make a better background,
> a gradient or an image.
> 

I'd suggest to make it plain black, but anything darker than #003c3c will do.

Nik


-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA.



Re: FVWM: Website

2016-07-09 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Dan Espen  wrote:

> Thomas Adam  writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> >> Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is
> nice,
> >> but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the
> >> actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big
> >> improvement, but so would a darker solid color.
> >
> > That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your
> issue,
> > please?
>
> he's complaining that the web site looks like the user
> has set the root window to white.
>
> I didn't notice before, but I agree, it's not pleasant
> to look at.  I wonder what would make a better background,
> a gradient or an image.
>
>
​Easy enough to change,

you can also hit the maximize button and get rid of the border all together.

jaimos​


Re: FVWM: Website

2016-07-09 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice,
> but the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the
> actual text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big
> improvement, but so would a darker solid color.

That's rather too vague; can you be a little more specific about your issue,
please?

> I won't be replying to queries; I'm unsubscribing now as I haven't used FVWM
> for a long time. Despite trying for years, I can't really get on with the
> configuration language. I'm much happier with systems with few features
> built-in, but scriptable in ways that make it easy for me to add more. I get
> less confused that way. :)

Well, FVWM is extensible just not likely in a way that's obvious to you, but
at this point it's not only irrelevant, it's not worth the effort trying to
convince you of it either.  ;)

-- Thomas Adam



FVWM: Website

2016-07-09 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
Just a quick note regarding the current website: The basic design is nice, but 
the white border gives me a headache when trying to read any of the actual 
text. Some desktop image (scaled or tiled) would likely be a big improvement, 
but so would a darker solid color.

I won't be replying to queries; I'm unsubscribing now as I haven't used FVWM 
for a long time. Despite trying for years, I can't really get on with the 
configuration language. I'm much happier with systems with few features 
built-in, but scriptable in ways that make it easy for me to add more. I get 
less confused that way. :)

-- 
I'm too old to use vi.